Paper · 2025 · Functional Plant Biology

Assessing the synergistic effects of biochar, hydrogel and biofertilizer on growth and physiological traits of wheat in saline environments

Dilfuza Jabborova; Zafarjon Jabbarov; Tokhtasin Abdrakhmanov; et al.

13
claims
32
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil salinity affects plant growth and crop yield. This warrants the urgent need for sustainable management. Our research aims to assess the impact of hydrogel, biochar and biofertilizer on wheat physiology, yield, soil nutrients and enzymes. The study was carried out at the dry bed of the Aral Sea. The experimental design included hydrogel, biochar, biofertilizer (Yer malxami includes Azotobacter chroococcum, Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus subtilis ) and control treatments. After 60days of sowing, plant growth metrics, physiological qualities, root morphological features, soil nutrients and enzyme activities were measured. The findings revealed significant improvement in growth of wheat following biofertilizer, hydrogel and biochar treatments. Applying biofertilizer resulted in a notable increase in the total root length by 69.9%, root volume by 123.7% and root diameter by 84.6%, and the highest chlorophyll a (Chl a ) by 13.3%, chlorophyll b by 13.7% (Chl b ) and total chlorophyll content by 13.1% compared to other treatments. Biofertilizer treatment significantly enhanced plant nitrogen (N) content by 16.0%, phosphorus (P) content by 94.7% and potassium (K) content by 51.8%, and increased the activities of soil enzymes such as catalase and invertase. The implementation of these soil amendments can be posited to mitigate the deleterious effects of saline conditions on wheat and can improve wheat growth under salinity stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer significantly improved wheat growth.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant improvement in growth of wheat following biofertilizer, hydrogel and biochar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat in saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel significantly improved wheat growth.

Treatment
hydrogele0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant improvement in growth of wheat following biofertilizer, hydrogel and biochar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly improved wheat growth.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant improvement in growth of wheat following biofertilizer, hydrogel and biochar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer increased total root length by 69.9% compared with other treatments.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
total root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
69.9%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0
Setting
dry bed of the Aral Seae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying biofertilizer resulted in a notable increase in the total root length by 69.9%, root volume by 123.7% and root diameter by 84.6%, and the highest chlorophyll a (Chl a ) by 13.3%, chlorophyll b by 13.7% (Chl b ) and total chlorophyll content by 13.1% compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry bed of the Aral Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat in saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer increased root volume by 123.7% compared with other treatments.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
root volumee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
123.7%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0
Setting
dry bed of the Aral Seae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying biofertilizer resulted in a notable increase in the total root length by 69.9%, root volume by 123.7% and root diameter by 84.6%, and the highest chlorophyll a (Chl a ) by 13.3%, chlorophyll b by 13.7% (Chl b ) and total chlorophyll content by 13.1% compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry bed of the Aral Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat in saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer increased root diameter by 84.6% compared with other treatments.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
root diametere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
84.6%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0
Setting
dry bed of the Aral Seae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying biofertilizer resulted in a notable increase in the total root length by 69.9%, root volume by 123.7% and root diameter by 84.6%, and the highest chlorophyll a (Chl a ) by 13.3%, chlorophyll b by 13.7% (Chl b ) and total chlorophyll content by 13.1% compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry bed of the Aral Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat in saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer produced the highest chlorophyll a, by 13.3% compared with other treatments.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13.3%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0
Setting
dry bed of the Aral Seae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying biofertilizer resulted in a notable increase in the total root length by 69.9%, root volume by 123.7% and root diameter by 84.6%, and the highest chlorophyll a (Chl a ) by 13.3%, chlorophyll b by 13.7% (Chl b ) and total chlorophyll content by 13.1% compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry bed of the Aral Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat in saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer produced the highest chlorophyll b, by 13.7% compared with other treatments.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13.7%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0
Setting
dry bed of the Aral Seae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying biofertilizer resulted in a notable increase in the total root length by 69.9%, root volume by 123.7% and root diameter by 84.6%, and the highest chlorophyll a (Chl a ) by 13.3%, chlorophyll b by 13.7% (Chl b ) and total chlorophyll content by 13.1% compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry bed of the Aral Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat in saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer produced the highest total chlorophyll content, by 13.1% compared with other treatments.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13.1%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0
Setting
dry bed of the Aral Seae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying biofertilizer resulted in a notable increase in the total root length by 69.9%, root volume by 123.7% and root diameter by 84.6%, and the highest chlorophyll a (Chl a ) by 13.3%, chlorophyll b by 13.7% (Chl b ) and total chlorophyll content by 13.1% compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry bed of the Aral Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat in saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer significantly increased plant nitrogen content by 16.0%.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
plant nitrogen (N) contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
16.0%e0
Setting
dry bed of the Aral Seae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer treatment significantly enhanced plant nitrogen (N) content by 16.0%, phosphorus (P) content by 94.7% and potassium (K) content by 51.8%, and increased the activities of soil enzymes such as catalase and invertase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1273 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry bed of the Aral Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat in saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer significantly increased plant phosphorus content by 94.7%.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
phosphorus (P) contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
94.7%e0
Setting
dry bed of the Aral Seae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer treatment significantly enhanced plant nitrogen (N) content by 16.0%, phosphorus (P) content by 94.7% and potassium (K) content by 51.8%, and increased the activities of soil enzymes such as catalase and invertase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1273 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry bed of the Aral Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat in saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer significantly increased plant potassium content by 51.8%.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
potassium (K) contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
51.8%e0
Setting
dry bed of the Aral Seae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer treatment significantly enhanced plant nitrogen (N) content by 16.0%, phosphorus (P) content by 94.7% and potassium (K) content by 51.8%, and increased the activities of soil enzymes such as catalase and invertase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1273 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry bed of the Aral Sea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat in saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer increased soil catalase and invertase activities.

Treatment
Biofertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
activities of soil enzymes such as catalase and invertasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer treatment significantly enhanced plant nitrogen (N) content by 16.0%, phosphorus (P) content by 94.7% and potassium (K) content by 51.8%, and increased the activities of soil enzymes such as catalase and invertase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1273 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 44 positive, 3 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 76 positive, 6 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

biochar · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

other · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 100 positive, 14 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.