Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Science and Engineering

Effects of Water-Fertilizer Synergy Management on Sustainable Rice Production: Growth, Yield, and Environmental Impacts

Haoxuan Ding

12
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

To address the dual challenges of water scarcity and non-point source pollution in global rice cultivation, this study systematically evaluated the interactive effects of irrigation regimes (continuous flooding, intermittent irrigation, shallow-wet irrigation) and fertilization strategies (conventional fertilization, reduced slow-release fertilizer application). Results showed that the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%), promoted deep root development (root length density increased by 26.7%), and increased grain dry matter allocation by 6.8%. The yield reached 8.52 t/ha, showing no significant difference from conventional practices, while water use efficiency improved by 32% (1.24 kg/m³) and partial nitrogen productivity increased by 28.3%. Environmentally, this treatment reduced methane emissions by 39.5% (225 kg/ha), lowered peak total nitrogen concentration in surface water by 34.2%, and decreased nitrate leaching risks. The study reveals that optimized water-fertilizer management stabilizes yield and enhances efficiency by controlling tiller redundancy and synchronizing nutrient release with root expansion. We recommend adopting an irrigation regime of "water control during tillering + shallow flooding at booting + alternating wet-dry conditions during grain filling," combined with a 40–50% reduction in slow-release nitrogen base fertilizer, to support green rice production. Future research should focus on long-term impacts of water-fertilizer management on soil microbial communities and carbon sequestration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers of rice.

Treatment
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizere1
Outcome
non-productive tillerse1
Direction
suppressede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Productive tiller rate of rice increased to 74.1% under intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer.

Treatment
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizere1
Outcome
productive tiller ratee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
74.1%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length density of rice increased by 26.7% under intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer.

Organ / stage
deep roote2
Treatment
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizere1
Outcome
root length densitye2
Direction
increasede2
Value
26.7%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 · show in text ↑
e2

“promoted deep root development (root length density increased by 26.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain dry matter allocation of rice increased by 6.8% under intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer.

Treatment
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizere1
Outcome
grain dry matter allocatione3
Direction
increasede3
Value
6.8%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 · show in text ↑
e3

“increased grain dry matter allocation by 6.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield under intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer reached 8.52 t/ha, with no significant difference from conventional practices.

Treatment
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizere1
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
no significant differencee4
Value
8.52 t/hae4
Comparator
conventional practicese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 · show in text ↑
e4

“The yield reached 8.52 t/ha, showing no significant difference from conventional practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency of rice improved by 32% under intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer.

Treatment
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizere1
Outcome
water use efficiencye5
Direction
improvede5
Value
32%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 · show in text ↑
e5

“water use efficiency improved by 32% (1.24 kg/m³) and partial nitrogen productivity increased by 28.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial nitrogen productivity of rice increased by 28.3% under intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer.

Treatment
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizere1
Outcome
partial nitrogen productivitye5
Direction
increasede5
Value
28.3%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 · show in text ↑
e5

“water use efficiency improved by 32% (1.24 kg/m³) and partial nitrogen productivity increased by 28.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer reduced methane emissions from rice by 39.5%.

Treatment
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizere1
Outcome
methane emissionse6
Direction
reducede6
Value
39.5%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 · show in text ↑
e6

“reduced methane emissions by 39.5% (225 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer lowered the peak total nitrogen concentration in rice surface water by 34.2%.

Treatment
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizere1
Outcome
peak total nitrogen concentration in surface watere7
Direction
lowerede7
Value
34.2%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 · show in text ↑
e7

“lowered peak total nitrogen concentration in surface water by 34.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer decreased nitrate leaching risks in rice fields.

Treatment
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizere1
Outcome
nitrate leaching riskse2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased nitrate leaching risks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1069 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized water-fertilizer management is asserted to stabilize rice yield by controlling tiller redundancy and synchronizing nutrient release with root expansion.

Outcome
stabilizes yielde1
Qualifier
controlling tiller redundancy and synchronizing nutrient release with root expansione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“stabilizes yield and enhances efficiency by controlling tiller redundancy and synchronizing nutrient release with root expansion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1260 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adopt a water-control-during-tillering, shallow-flooding-at-booting and alternating wet-dry irrigation regime, combined with a 40–50% reduction in slow-release nitrogen base fertilizer, for green rice production.

Outcome
adopting an irrigation regimee1
Value
40–50%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“global rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“We recommend adopting an irrigation regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1304 · show in text ↑
e2

“combined with a 40–50% reduction in slow-release nitrogen base fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1499 · show in text ↑

fertilization · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

108 papers: 73 positive, 35 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 57 positive, 5 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

irrigation · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 109 positive, 18 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 119 positive, 25 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.