Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Assessment of saline water irrigation on biomass and quality of alfalfa: A sustainable agriculture perspective

Boyuan Lou; Yanzhe Hu; Teng Li; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The lack of freshwater resources is a critical limiting factor for the crop production in the arid and semi-arid regions. Saline water irrigation presents a viable solution for addressing freshwater scarcity, particularly in North China Plain, by leveraging saline water resources to sustain crop production while minimizing soil salinity accumulation through seasonal rainfall leaching. This study assessed the effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality across five irrigation amounts (20–100 mm) in 2022–2023. Results showed that reasonable saline water irrigation significantly enhanced alfalfa biomass and quality. Biomass increased markedly in the first two harvests (H1, H2) due to the irrigation but not in the latter two (H3, H4). The maximum biomass achieved at 60 mm (5.0 dS/m, 15.99 t/ha) and 76 mm (7.6 dS/m, 14.71 t/ha), representing 40.3 % and 24.3 % increases over rainfed controls. Early-season harvests (H1-H2) exhibited 10–67 % biomass enhancements primarily through stem growth (35–80 % contribution). CP was significantly increased at the H1 with irrigation of 60 mm (5.0 dS/m), whereas elevated salinity (7.6 dS/m) increased ADF and NDF content. Saline water irrigation elevated soil EC, while summer rainfall effectively leached salts, maintaining 0–40 cm soil salinity below alfalfa tolerance thresholds. Structural equation modeling quantified critical interactions: irrigation amount directly enhanced biomass while elevating soil EC, and water salinity indirectly reduced yield via EC accumulation. The optimal irrigation amounts were determined to be 51.0–72.3 mm for 5.0dS/m saline water and 58.3–76.0 mm for 7.6dS/m water, which balanced 20–40 % yield gains with stable interannual soil EC. • Saline water irrigation enhanced the alfalfa biomass by 20–40 %. • Reasonable saline water irrigation scheduling balanced the salt content in the 0–40 cm soil profile. • The optimal saline water irrigation schedules is 51–76 mm with the 5.0–7.6 dS/m water salinity levels for alfalfa in the NCP.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline water irrigation increased alfalfa biomass in the first two harvests (H1, H2) at 5.0 and 7.6 dS/m.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Organ / stage
first two harvests (H1, H2)e1
Treatment
saline water irrigatione2
Outcome
Biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
rainfed controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Biomass increased markedly in the first two harvests (H1, H2) due to the irrigation but not in the latter two (H3, H4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–779 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
e3

“representing 40.3 % and 24.3 % increases over rainfed controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline water irrigation did not increase alfalfa biomass in the latter two harvests (H3, H4).

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Organ / stage
latter two (H3, H4)e1
Treatment
saline water irrigatione2
Outcome
Biomasse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Biomass increased markedly in the first two harvests (H1, H2) due to the irrigation but not in the latter two (H3, H4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–779 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum alfalfa biomass at 5.0 dS/m was 15.99 t/ha at 60 mm irrigation, a 40.3 % increase over rainfed controls.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
60 mme1
Outcome
maximum biomasse1
Direction
increasese1
Value
15.99 t/hae1
Comparator
rainfed controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum biomass achieved at 60 mm (5.0 dS/m, 15.99 t/ha) and 76 mm (7.6 dS/m, 14.71 t/ha), representing 40.3 % and 24.3 % increases over rainfed controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–938 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum alfalfa biomass at 7.6 dS/m was 14.71 t/ha at 76 mm irrigation, a 24.3 % increase over rainfed controls.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
76 mme1
Outcome
maximum biomasse1
Direction
increasese1
Value
14.71 t/hae1
Comparator
rainfed controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum biomass achieved at 60 mm (5.0 dS/m, 15.99 t/ha) and 76 mm (7.6 dS/m, 14.71 t/ha), representing 40.3 % and 24.3 % increases over rainfed controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–938 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-season harvests (H1-H2) showed 10–67 % biomass enhancement from saline water irrigation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Organ / stage
Early-season harvests (H1-H2)e1
Treatment
saline water irrigatione2
Outcome
biomass enhancementse1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
10–67 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Early-season harvests (H1-H2) exhibited 10–67 % biomass enhancements primarily through stem growth (35–80 % contribution)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1061 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem growth contributed 35–80 % of the early-season biomass enhancement in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Outcome
stem growthe1
Value
35–80 %e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Early-season harvests (H1-H2) exhibited 10–67 % biomass enhancements primarily through stem growth (35–80 % contribution)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1061 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein (CP) was significantly increased at the first harvest with 60 mm irrigation at 5.0 dS/m.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Organ / stage
H1e1
Treatment
irrigation of 60 mm (5.0 dS/m)e1
Outcome
CPe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“CP was significantly increased at the H1 with irrigation of 60 mm (5.0 dS/m), whereas elevated salinity (7.6 dS/m) increased ADF and NDF content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1207 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated salinity (7.6 dS/m) increased ADF and NDF content in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
elevated salinity (7.6 dS/m)e1
Outcome
ADF and NDF contente1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“CP was significantly increased at the H1 with irrigation of 60 mm (5.0 dS/m), whereas elevated salinity (7.6 dS/m) increased ADF and NDF content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1207 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline water irrigation elevated soil EC.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
Saline water irrigatione1
Outcome
soil ECe1
Direction
elevatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Saline water irrigation elevated soil EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1249 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer rainfall kept 0–40 cm soil salinity below alfalfa tolerance thresholds.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
0–40 cm soil salinitye1
Qualifier
below alfalfa tolerance thresholdse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“summer rainfall effectively leached salts, maintaining 0–40 cm soil salinity below alfalfa tolerance thresholds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1368 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation amount directly enhanced alfalfa biomass in structural equation modelling.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
irrigation amounte1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
enhancede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“irrigation amount directly enhanced biomass while elevating soil EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1500 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water salinity indirectly reduced alfalfa yield via soil EC accumulation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
water salinitye1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
via EC accumulatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“water salinity indirectly reduced yield via EC accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1565 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of saline water irrigation (5.0 and 7.6 dS/m) on alfalfa biomass and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal irrigation amount at 5.0 dS/m saline water is 51.0–72.3 mm for alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Outcome
optimal irrigation amountse1
Value
51.0–72.3 mme1
Qualifier
5.0dS/m saline watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The optimal irrigation amounts were determined to be 51.0–72.3 mm for 5.0dS/m saline water and 58.3–76.0 mm for 7.6dS/m water, which balanced 20–40 % yield gains with stable interannual soil EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1760 · show in text ↑
e2

“The optimal saline water irrigation schedules is 51–76 mm with the 5.0–7.6 dS/m water salinity levels for alfalfa in the NCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2058 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal irrigation amount at 7.6 dS/m water is 58.3–76.0 mm for alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Outcome
optimal irrigation amountse1
Value
58.3–76.0 mme1
Qualifier
7.6dS/m watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The optimal irrigation amounts were determined to be 51.0–72.3 mm for 5.0dS/m saline water and 58.3–76.0 mm for 7.6dS/m water, which balanced 20–40 % yield gains with stable interannual soil EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1760 · show in text ↑
e2

“The optimal saline water irrigation schedules is 51–76 mm with the 5.0–7.6 dS/m water salinity levels for alfalfa in the NCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline water irrigation enhanced alfalfa biomass by 20–40 %.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Saline water irrigatione1
Outcome
alfalfa biomasse1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
20–40 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Saline water irrigation enhanced the alfalfa biomass by 20–40 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1828 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 22 positive, 15 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

salinity · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 19 positive, 76 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.