Abstract
Mango fruit is one of the most important cultivar in the konkan region. In postharvest handling, mango fruit can be affected by number of pathogens. Some of the phytopathogens that severely attack mango fruit are the fungal Colletotrichum, Lasiodiplodia and Aspergillus causing the fruit rot diseases of the mango fruit. The presence of these pathogens can generate postharvest losses between 5-30% of mango production. In some places the fungicides such as Carbendezim are commercially used to control the fruit rot diseases such as Anthracnose, Stem end rot and Aspergillus rot. To reduce and eradicate use of fungicides in post-harvest, methods that are not harmful to the consumer have been tried in the experiments. Different post-harvest treatments have been applied to mango fruit, including chlorinated water, Chitosan along with Acetic Acid, Salicylic acid Blue light exposure High power LED 450 nm and Hot air and hot water treatment at 52 °C. The result with the application of these methods has been efficient but all the treatments (except HWT at 52 °C.) shown drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruits. There is no higher weight loss or phytotoxic effect of Hot water treatment at 52 °C on mango fruit.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Colletotrichum causes mango fruit rot.
- Taxon
- mango fruit
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae0 - Interactor
- Colletotrichum
Colletotrichume0pathogen - Outcome
- fruit rot diseasese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the fungal Colletotrichum, Lasiodiplodia and Aspergillus causing the fruit rot diseases of the mango fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Lasiodiplodia causes mango fruit rot.
- Taxon
- mango fruitMangifera indicae0
- Interactor
- LasiodiplodiaLasiodiplodiae0pathogen
- Outcome
- fruit rot diseasese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the fungal Colletotrichum, Lasiodiplodia and Aspergillus causing the fruit rot diseases of the mango fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Aspergillus causes mango fruit rot.
- Taxon
- mango fruitMangifera indicae0
- Interactor
- Aspergillus
Aspergilluse0pathogen - Outcome
- fruit rot diseasese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the fungal Colletotrichum, Lasiodiplodia and Aspergillus causing the fruit rot diseases of the mango fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
These pathogens can cause postharvest losses of 5-30% of mango production.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Interactor
- ColletotrichumColletotrichume1pathogen
- Second interactor
- LasiodiplodiaLasiodiplodiae1pathogen
- Outcome
- postharvest lossese0
- Value
- 5-30%e0
- Qualifier
- Aspergilluse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The presence of these pathogens can generate postharvest losses between 5-30% of mango production.”
e1“Colletotrichum, Lasiodiplodia and Aspergillus causing the fruit rot diseases of the mango fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorinated water was efficient against postharvest mango fruit rot but caused drastic phytotoxicity.
- Taxon
- mango fruitMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- chlorinated watere0
- Outcome
- drastic phytotoxicitye0
- Direction
- drastice0
- Qualifier
- efficiente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different post-harvest treatments have been applied to mango fruit, including chlorinated water, Chitosan along with Acetic Acid, Salicylic acid Blue light exposure High power LED 450 nm and Hot air and hot water treatment at 52 °C. The result with the application of these methods has been efficient but all the treatments (except HWT at 52 °C.) shown drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruits.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan with acetic acid was efficient but caused drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruit.
- Taxon
- mango fruitMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- Chitosan along with Acetic Acide0
- Outcome
- drastic phytotoxicitye0
- Direction
- drastice0
- Qualifier
- efficiente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different post-harvest treatments have been applied to mango fruit, including chlorinated water, Chitosan along with Acetic Acid, Salicylic acid Blue light exposure High power LED 450 nm and Hot air and hot water treatment at 52 °C. The result with the application of these methods has been efficient but all the treatments (except HWT at 52 °C.) shown drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruits.”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid treatment was efficient but caused drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruit.
- Taxon
- mango fruitMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- Salicylic acide0
- Outcome
- drastic phytotoxicitye0
- Direction
- drastice0
- Qualifier
- efficiente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different post-harvest treatments have been applied to mango fruit, including chlorinated water, Chitosan along with Acetic Acid, Salicylic acid Blue light exposure High power LED 450 nm and Hot air and hot water treatment at 52 °C. The result with the application of these methods has been efficient but all the treatments (except HWT at 52 °C.) shown drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruits.”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue light exposure was efficient but caused drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruit.
- Taxon
- mango fruitMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- Blue light exposuree0
- Outcome
- drastic phytotoxicitye0
- Direction
- drastice0
- Qualifier
- efficiente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different post-harvest treatments have been applied to mango fruit, including chlorinated water, Chitosan along with Acetic Acid, Salicylic acid Blue light exposure High power LED 450 nm and Hot air and hot water treatment at 52 °C. The result with the application of these methods has been efficient but all the treatments (except HWT at 52 °C.) shown drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruits.”
Claim · model-written summary
High power LED at 450 nm was efficient but caused drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruit.
- Taxon
- mango fruitMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- High power LED 450 nme0
- Outcome
- drastic phytotoxicitye0
- Direction
- drastice0
- Qualifier
- efficiente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different post-harvest treatments have been applied to mango fruit, including chlorinated water, Chitosan along with Acetic Acid, Salicylic acid Blue light exposure High power LED 450 nm and Hot air and hot water treatment at 52 °C. The result with the application of these methods has been efficient but all the treatments (except HWT at 52 °C.) shown drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruits.”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot air treatment was efficient but caused drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruit.
- Taxon
- mango fruitMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- Hot aire0
- Outcome
- drastic phytotoxicitye0
- Direction
- drastice0
- Qualifier
- efficiente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different post-harvest treatments have been applied to mango fruit, including chlorinated water, Chitosan along with Acetic Acid, Salicylic acid Blue light exposure High power LED 450 nm and Hot air and hot water treatment at 52 °C. The result with the application of these methods has been efficient but all the treatments (except HWT at 52 °C.) shown drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruits.”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot water treatment at 52 °C was efficient without drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruit.
- Taxon
- mango fruitsMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- hot water treatment at 52 °Ce0
- Outcome
- drastic phytotoxicitye0
- Qualifier
- except HWT at 52 °C.e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“hot water treatment at 52 °C. The result with the application of these methods has been efficient but all the treatments (except HWT at 52 °C.) shown drastic phytotoxicity on mango fruits.”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot water treatment at 52 °C caused no higher weight loss in mango fruit.
- Taxon
- mango fruitMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- Hot water treatment at 52 °Ce0
- Outcome
- weight losse0
- Direction
- no highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There is no higher weight loss or phytotoxic effect of Hot water treatment at 52 °C on mango fruit.”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot water treatment at 52 °C had no phytotoxic effect on mango fruit.
- Taxon
- mango fruitMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- Hot water treatment at 52 °Ce0
- Outcome
- phytotoxic effecte0
- Direction
- noe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There is no higher weight loss or phytotoxic effect of Hot water treatment at 52 °C on mango fruit.”
The same questions in other papers
heat · crop injury · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →heat · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.