Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Evaluation of the Comprehensive Effects of Biodegradable Mulch Films on the Soil Hydrothermal Flux, Root Architecture, and Yield of Drip-Irrigated Rice

Zhiwen Song; Guodong Wang; Quanyou Hao; et al.

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biodegradable mulch films not only provide similar field benefits to conventional mulch films but also degrade naturally, rendering them an effective alternative to traditional polyethylene mulch films for mitigating “white pollution”. However, recent studies have focused on the material selection and soil ecological impacts of biodegradable mulch films, while their effects on soil water temperature regulation and root architecture in drip-irrigated rice cultivation remain unclear. To address this research gap, in this study, various treatments including no mulch (NM), conventional plastic mulch (PM), and four types of biodegradable mulch films (BM-W1, BM-B1, BM-B2, and BM-B3) were established, and their effects on the soil hydrothermal flux, root architecture, biomass accumulation, and resource use efficiency of drip-irrigated rice were analyzed at different growth stages. The results indicated the following: (1) Compared with the NM treatment, film mulching increased the soil hydrothermal fluxes and water retention capacity, thereby promoting root growth and biomass accumulation, ultimately increasing the effective panicle number and grain yield. (2) Among the biodegradable film treatments, BM-B3 (with a degradation period of 105 days) maintained relatively higher soil temperature for a longer duration, which increased surface root distribution in the mid-to-late growth stages, further improving fine root growth and biomass accumulation, consequently enhancing both yield and water use efficiency. In contrast, BM-B1 and BM-B2 exhibited excessively rapid degradation rates, leading to significant fluctuations in soil moisture and temperature, thereby negatively affecting water supply and nutrient uptake and ultimately restricting root growth and development. (3) The entropy weight (EW) technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) model results revealed that although the PM treatment was more advantageous in terms of soil temperature, root dry weight, and soil moisture content, BM-B3 provided a slightly higher yield than the PM treatment did and offered the advantage of biodegradability, making it a preferred alternative to conventional mulch film. In summary, this study revealed the mechanism by which biodegradable mulch films enhanced biomass accumulation and yield formation in drip-irrigated rice production by optimizing soil hydrothermal dynamics and root architecture, thereby exploring their potential as replacements for conventional mulch films. These findings provide a theoretical basis for the efficient and sustainable production of drip-irrigated rice in arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching increased soil hydrothermal fluxes and water retention capacity of drip-irrigated rice relative to no mulch.

Treatment
film mulchinge1
Outcome
soil hydrothermal fluxes and water retention capacitye1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
NM treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the NM treatment, film mulching increased the soil hydrothermal fluxes and water retention capacity, thereby promoting root growth and biomass accumulation, ultimately increasing the effective panicle number and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching promoted root growth and biomass accumulation of drip-irrigated rice relative to no mulch.

Treatment
film mulchinge1
Outcome
root growth and biomass accumulatione1
Direction
promotinge1
Comparator
NM treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the NM treatment, film mulching increased the soil hydrothermal fluxes and water retention capacity, thereby promoting root growth and biomass accumulation, ultimately increasing the effective panicle number and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching increased the effective panicle number and grain yield of drip-irrigated rice relative to no mulch.

Treatment
film mulchinge1
Outcome
effective panicle number and grain yielde1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
NM treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the NM treatment, film mulching increased the soil hydrothermal fluxes and water retention capacity, thereby promoting root growth and biomass accumulation, ultimately increasing the effective panicle number and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-B3 maintained relatively higher soil temperature for a longer duration than the other biodegradable film treatments.

Treatment
BM-B3e2
Outcome
soil temperaturee2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
for a longer duratione2
Comparator
biodegradable film treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the biodegradable film treatments, BM-B3 (with a degradation period of 105 days) maintained relatively higher soil temperature for a longer duration, which increased surface root distribution in the mid-to-late growth stages, further improving fine root growth and biomass accumulation, consequently enhancing both yield and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-B3 increased surface root distribution of rice in the mid-to-late growth stages relative to the other biodegradable film treatments.

Organ / stage
mid-to-late growth stagese2
Treatment
BM-B3e2
Outcome
surface root distributione2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
biodegradable film treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the biodegradable film treatments, BM-B3 (with a degradation period of 105 days) maintained relatively higher soil temperature for a longer duration, which increased surface root distribution in the mid-to-late growth stages, further improving fine root growth and biomass accumulation, consequently enhancing both yield and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-B3 improved fine root growth and biomass accumulation of rice relative to the other biodegradable film treatments.

Organ / stage
fine roote2
Treatment
BM-B3e2
Outcome
fine root growth and biomass accumulatione2
Direction
improvinge2
Comparator
biodegradable film treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the biodegradable film treatments, BM-B3 (with a degradation period of 105 days) maintained relatively higher soil temperature for a longer duration, which increased surface root distribution in the mid-to-late growth stages, further improving fine root growth and biomass accumulation, consequently enhancing both yield and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-B3 enhanced yield and water use efficiency of rice relative to the other biodegradable film treatments.

Treatment
BM-B3e2
Outcome
yield and water use efficiencye2
Direction
enhancinge2
Comparator
biodegradable film treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the biodegradable film treatments, BM-B3 (with a degradation period of 105 days) maintained relatively higher soil temperature for a longer duration, which increased surface root distribution in the mid-to-late growth stages, further improving fine root growth and biomass accumulation, consequently enhancing both yield and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1522 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-B1 and BM-B2 degraded excessively rapidly.

Treatment
BM-B1 and BM-B2e3
Outcome
degradation ratese3
Qualifier
excessively rapide3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e3

“BM-B1 and BM-B2 exhibited excessively rapid degradation rates, leading to significant fluctuations in soil moisture and temperature, thereby negatively affecting water supply and nutrient uptake and ultimately restricting root growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-B1 and BM-B2 restricted root growth and development of rice relative to BM-B3.

Treatment
BM-B1 and BM-B2e3
Outcome
root growth and developmente3
Direction
restrictinge3
Comparator
BM-B3e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the biodegradable film treatments, BM-B3 (with a degradation period of 105 days) maintained relatively higher soil temperature for a longer duration, which increased surface root distribution in the mid-to-late growth stages, further improving fine root growth and biomass accumulation, consequently enhancing both yield and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1522 · show in text ↑
e3

“BM-B1 and BM-B2 exhibited excessively rapid degradation rates, leading to significant fluctuations in soil moisture and temperature, thereby negatively affecting water supply and nutrient uptake and ultimately restricting root growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1786 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-B1 and BM-B2 caused significant fluctuations in soil moisture and temperature.

Outcome
soil moisture and temperaturee3
Qualifier
significant fluctuationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e3

“BM-B1 and BM-B2 exhibited excessively rapid degradation rates, leading to significant fluctuations in soil moisture and temperature, thereby negatively affecting water supply and nutrient uptake and ultimately restricting root growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1786 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The PM treatment was more advantageous than the other treatments in soil temperature, root dry weight and soil moisture content.

Treatment
PM treatmente4
Outcome
soil temperature, root dry weight, and soil moisture contente4
Qualifier
more advantageouse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e4

“although the PM treatment was more advantageous in terms of soil temperature, root dry weight, and soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-B3 gave a slightly higher yield of rice than the PM treatment.

Treatment
BM-B3e5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
slightlye5
Comparator
PM treatmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e5

“BM-B3 provided a slightly higher yield than the PM treatment did”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2105 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

BM-B3 is a preferred alternative to conventional mulch film for rice because it is biodegradable.

Outcome
preferred alternative to conventional mulch filme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e6

“offered the advantage of biodegradability, making it a preferred alternative to conventional mulch film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2213 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biodegradable mulch films enhanced biomass accumulation and yield formation of drip-irrigated rice by optimizing soil hydrothermal dynamics and root architecture.

Treatment
biodegradable mulch filmse7
Outcome
biomass accumulation and yield formatione7
Qualifier
by optimizing soil hydrothermal dynamics and root architecturee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drip-Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–151 · show in text ↑
e7

“revealed the mechanism by which biodegradable mulch films enhanced biomass accumulation and yield formation in drip-irrigated rice production by optimizing soil hydrothermal dynamics and root architecture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2238–2442 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Mulching reduced rice yield by 43% in one of four comparisons with burning.

    Effect of residue management and fallow length on weeds and rice yield · 1998 · compared with farmers' traditional burning of crop and weed residues

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

mulching · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 34 positive, 12 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.