Abstract

The remediation of lead (Pb)-contaminated soils through eco-friendly strategies is critical for sustainable agriculture. This study investigated the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in enhancing maize tolerance to Pb stress and modulating rhizosphere microbial communities. A pot experiment was conducted with maize (Baiyu833) under four Pb concentrations (0, 900, 1800, 2700 mg·kg−1) and three AMF treatments: non-inoculation (Non), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), or Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri). The results demonstrated that AMF inoculation significantly increased plant biomass, boosted antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD), and reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, mitigating Pb-induced oxidative stress. AMF restricted Pb translocation to aerial parts, with root Pb accumulation reaching 2110.76 mg·kg−1 (Fm) and 2090.56 mg·kg−1 (Ri) under Pb2700, enhancing phytostabilization. High-throughput sequencing revealed that AMF inoculation enriched α-diversity indices and restructured bacterial communities, favoring beneficial taxa like Promicromonospora, which are linked to heavy metal resistance and plant growth promotion. Principal coordinate analysis highlighted distinct clustering of microbial communities driven by AMF, emphasizing their role in alleviating Pb toxicity. These findings underscore that AMF enhance maize resilience to Pb by regulating antioxidant defense, immobilizing Pb in roots, and recruiting stress-tolerant rhizosphere microbiomes. This study provides insights into AMF-assisted phytoremediation as a sustainable strategy for Pb-contaminated soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation significantly increased maize plant biomass.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
plant biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
non-inoculation (Non)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“A pot experiment was conducted with maize (Baiyu833) under four Pb concentrations (0, 900, 1800, 2700 mg·kg−1) and three AMF treatments: non-inoculation (Non), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), or Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation significantly increased plant biomass, boosted antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD), and reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, mitigating Pb-induced oxidative stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation boosted maize antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD)e1
Direction
boostede1
Comparator
non-inoculation (Non)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“A pot experiment was conducted with maize (Baiyu833) under four Pb concentrations (0, 900, 1800, 2700 mg·kg−1) and three AMF treatments: non-inoculation (Non), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), or Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation significantly increased plant biomass, boosted antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD), and reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, mitigating Pb-induced oxidative stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in maize under Pb stress.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) levelse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
Pb-induced oxidative stresse1
Comparator
non-inoculation (Non)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“A pot experiment was conducted with maize (Baiyu833) under four Pb concentrations (0, 900, 1800, 2700 mg·kg−1) and three AMF treatments: non-inoculation (Non), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), or Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation significantly increased plant biomass, boosted antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD), and reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, mitigating Pb-induced oxidative stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–721 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root Pb accumulation in maize under Pb2700 reached 2110.76 mg·kg−1 with Funneliformis mosseae.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
roote2
Treatment
Pb2700e2
Interactor
Funneliformis mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
root Pb accumulatione2
Value
2110.76 mg·kg−1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“A pot experiment was conducted with maize (Baiyu833) under four Pb concentrations (0, 900, 1800, 2700 mg·kg−1) and three AMF treatments: non-inoculation (Non), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), or Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–504 · show in text ↑
e2

“with root Pb accumulation reaching 2110.76 mg·kg−1 (Fm) and 2090.56 mg·kg−1 (Ri) under Pb2700”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–865 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root Pb accumulation in maize under Pb2700 reached 2090.56 mg·kg−1 with Rhizophagus intraradices.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
roote2
Treatment
Pb2700e2
Interactor
Rhizophagus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
root Pb accumulatione2
Value
2090.56 mg·kg−1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“A pot experiment was conducted with maize (Baiyu833) under four Pb concentrations (0, 900, 1800, 2700 mg·kg−1) and three AMF treatments: non-inoculation (Non), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), or Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–504 · show in text ↑
e2

“with root Pb accumulation reaching 2110.76 mg·kg−1 (Fm) and 2090.56 mg·kg−1 (Ri) under Pb2700”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF restricted Pb translocation from roots to aerial parts of maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AMFe3
Interactor
AMFe3symbiont
Outcome
Pb translocation to aerial partse3
Direction
restrictede3
Comparator
non-inoculation (Non)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“A pot experiment was conducted with maize (Baiyu833) under four Pb concentrations (0, 900, 1800, 2700 mg·kg−1) and three AMF treatments: non-inoculation (Non), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), or Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–504 · show in text ↑
e3

“AMF restricted Pb translocation to aerial parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation enriched alpha-diversity indices of maize rhizosphere bacteria.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione4
Outcome
α-diversity indicese4
Direction
enrichede4
Comparator
non-inoculation (Non)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“A pot experiment was conducted with maize (Baiyu833) under four Pb concentrations (0, 900, 1800, 2700 mg·kg−1) and three AMF treatments: non-inoculation (Non), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), or Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–504 · show in text ↑
e4

“AMF inoculation enriched α-diversity indices and restructured bacterial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation restructured rhizosphere bacterial communities of maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione4
Outcome
bacterial communitiese4
Direction
restructurede4
Comparator
non-inoculation (Non)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“A pot experiment was conducted with maize (Baiyu833) under four Pb concentrations (0, 900, 1800, 2700 mg·kg−1) and three AMF treatments: non-inoculation (Non), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), or Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–504 · show in text ↑
e4

“AMF inoculation enriched α-diversity indices and restructured bacterial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation favoured beneficial bacterial taxa such as Promicromonospora in maize rhizosphere.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione4
Outcome
beneficial taxa like Promicromonosporae5
Direction
favoringe5
Comparator
non-inoculation (Non)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“A pot experiment was conducted with maize (Baiyu833) under four Pb concentrations (0, 900, 1800, 2700 mg·kg−1) and three AMF treatments: non-inoculation (Non), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), or Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–504 · show in text ↑
e4

“AMF inoculation enriched α-diversity indices and restructured bacterial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1021 · show in text ↑
e5

“favoring beneficial taxa like Promicromonospora, which are linked to heavy metal resistance and plant growth promotion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1141 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF drove distinct clustering of maize rhizosphere microbial communities.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AMFe6
Outcome
clustering of microbial communitiese6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e6

“Principal coordinate analysis highlighted distinct clustering of microbial communities driven by AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1243 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF enhance maize resilience to Pb by regulating antioxidant defence, immobilizing Pb in roots and recruiting stress-tolerant rhizosphere microbiomes.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
AMFe7symbiont
Outcome
resilience to Pbe7
Qualifier
regulating antioxidant defense, immobilizing Pb in roots, and recruiting stress-tolerant rhizosphere microbiomese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Lead Toxicity in Maize by Restructuring Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhancing Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“These findings underscore that AMF enhance maize resilience to Pb by regulating antioxidant defense, immobilizing Pb in roots, and recruiting stress-tolerant rhizosphere microbiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1477 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mycorrhiza · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 57 positive, 8 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 116 positive, 6 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

118 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

188 papers: 169 positive, 19 negative or no effect

168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

184 papers more in this group

See all 188 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.