Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Boron nutrition with NPs and H 3 BO 3 to change its fractionation in soil and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) productivity under alkaline calcareous conditions

Faisal Hayat; Muhammad Ashraf; Ahsan Aziz; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Injudicious boron (B) supply to correct its deficiency may lead to toxicity and a decline in crop growth and yield. This study was conducted for two consecutive seasons during 2022 and 2023 with the objective to optimize B supply for better grain yield and quality of wheat. Experimental plan comprised three B levels by soil application (control, 2 and 4 kg ha−1), two foliar spray levels (0.2 and 0.4% B solution), and combination of soil plus foliar application making total nine treatments. B was applied as nanoparticles (B-NPs) and boric acid (H3BO3). B nutrition at 2 kg ha−1 B-NPs while 4 kg ha−1 H3BO3 caused highest improvement in growth, yield, physiological, biochemical, and grain quality characteristics. Grain yield was maximally improved by 24.40 and 22.67% with 2 kg ha−1 B-NPs while, 20.18 and 19.0% with 4 kg ha−1 H3BO3 during 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared to the control. B application at higher level, particularly in soil plus foliar pattern caused toxicity as evidenced by an increase of 114.2 and 123.6% in H2O2 while, 89.47 and 93.22% in malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration with 4 kg ha−1+0.4% solution of B-NPs during 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared to control. Soil B was fractionated into six functionally active fractions. Of the total soil B, plant available B ranged from 0.59 to 2.48% with B-NPs while, 0.55–1.89% with H3BO3. In conclusion, B application at 2 kg ha−1 B-NPs while, 4 kg ha−1 H3BO3 could be recommended for optimum wheat productivity under alkaline calcareous conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B-NPs at 2 kg ha−1 gave the greatest growth, yield, physiological, biochemical and grain-quality improvement.

Treatment
2 kg ha−1 B-NPse0
Outcome
growth, yield, physiological, biochemical, and grain quality characteristicse0
Direction
highest improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B nutrition at 2 kg ha−1 B-NPs while 4 kg ha−1 H3BO3 caused highest improvement in growth, yield, physiological, biochemical, and grain quality characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H3BO3 at 4 kg ha−1 gave the greatest growth, yield, physiological, biochemical and grain-quality improvement.

Treatment
4 kg ha−1 H3BO3e0
Outcome
growth, yield, physiological, biochemical, and grain quality characteristicse0
Direction
highest improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B nutrition at 2 kg ha−1 B-NPs while 4 kg ha−1 H3BO3 caused highest improvement in growth, yield, physiological, biochemical, and grain quality characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B-NPs at 2 kg ha−1 improved grain yield by 24.40 and 22.67% in 2022 and 2023.

Treatment
2 kg ha−1 B-NPse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
24.40 and 22.67%e0
Qualifier
during 2022 and 2023e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was maximally improved by 24.40 and 22.67% with 2 kg ha−1 B-NPs while, 20.18 and 19.0% with 4 kg ha−1 H3BO3 during 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H3BO3 at 4 kg ha−1 improved grain yield by 20.18 and 19.0% in 2022 and 2023.

Treatment
4 kg ha−1 H3BO3e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
20.18 and 19.0%e0
Qualifier
during 2022 and 2023e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was maximally improved by 24.40 and 22.67% with 2 kg ha−1 B-NPs while, 20.18 and 19.0% with 4 kg ha−1 H3BO3 during 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar B-NPs at the high dose increased H2O2 by 114.2 and 123.6% across two seasons.

Treatment
4 kg ha−1+0.4% solution of B-NPse0
Outcome
H2O2e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
114.2 and 123.6%e0
Qualifier
during 2022 and 2023e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase of 114.2 and 123.6% in H2O2 while, 89.47 and 93.22% in malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration with 4 kg ha−1+0.4% solution of B-NPs during 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar B-NPs at the high dose increased MDA by 89.47 and 93.22% across two seasons.

Treatment
4 kg ha−1+0.4% solution of B-NPse0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
89.47 and 93.22%e0
Qualifier
during 2022 and 2023e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase of 114.2 and 123.6% in H2O2 while, 89.47 and 93.22% in malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration with 4 kg ha−1+0.4% solution of B-NPs during 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant-available soil B ranged from 0.59 to 2.48% under B-NPs.

Treatment
B-NPse0
Outcome
plant available Be0
Direction
ranged frome0
Value
0.59 to 2.48%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the total soil B, plant available B ranged from 0.59 to 2.48% with B-NPs while, 0.55–1.89% with H3BO3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant-available soil B ranged from 0.55–1.89% under H3BO3.

Treatment
H3BO3e0
Outcome
plant available Be0
Direction
ranged frome0
Value
0.55–1.89%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the total soil B, plant available B ranged from 0.59 to 2.48% with B-NPs while, 0.55–1.89% with H3BO3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 2 kg ha−1 B-NPs for optimum wheat productivity under alkaline calcareous conditions.

Outcome
2 kg ha−1 B-NPse0
Qualifier
under alkaline calcareous conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B application at 2 kg ha−1 B-NPs while, 4 kg ha−1 H3BO3 could be recommended for optimum wheat productivity under alkaline calcareous conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1532 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 4 kg ha−1 H3BO3 for optimum wheat productivity under alkaline calcareous conditions.

Outcome
4 kg ha−1 H3BO3e0
Qualifier
under alkaline calcareous conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B application at 2 kg ha−1 B-NPs while, 4 kg ha−1 H3BO3 could be recommended for optimum wheat productivity under alkaline calcareous conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1532 · show in text ↑

boric acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 35 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.