Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Drought tolerance of melon (Cucumis melo L.) genotypes using evapotranspiration and yield components in a semi-arid environment

Musa Seymen; Duran Yavuz; Ertan Sait Kurtar; et al.

20
claims
39
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Increasing drought all over the world, especially in semiarid regions, has made it difficult to access clean water resources for agriculture. In water-limited environments, farmers either use wastewater to irrigate their crops or apply severely restricted irrigation techniques with scarce clean water. In this study, 20 melon inbred line genotypes, 4 cultivars were evaluated for their seasonal evapotranspiration (ET) and yield components in a field test under full irrigation (I 100 ) and 50 % water stress (I 50 ) conditions for two years. Seasonal ET values calculated according to the soil-water budget method ranged from 373.3 to 594.3 mm in the 1st year and from 363.6 to 603.0 in the 2nd year. Seasonal ET underwent a significant decrease in the subjects receiving 50 % water stress, which led to serious losses of yield. Indeed, water stress, decreases in yield by 39 % and 42 %, on average, were recorded in 2023 and 2024, respectively. In addition, it negatively affected agro-morphological characteristics such as fruit number, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, and rind thickness. On the other hand, pH and soluble solid content in melon exposed to water stress significantly increased. Sürmeli F1 (G3) and Westeros F1 (G4) hybrid varieties showed a good performance in terms of yield components under both well-watered and water deficit conditions. Moreover, in the I 100 treatment, the water crop productivity (WPc) of G3 and G4 was found to be higher than that of the standard cultivars and inbred line genotypes. Under I 50 conditions, however, genotype G4 achieved the highest WPc, followed by G57, G62, G70, and G58. Results of the principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that genotypes G15, G40, G37, G62, and G79 and hybrid varieties G3 and G4, which occupied the same region on the PCA plot, were identified as water-stress tolerant genotypes based on yield components.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal evapotranspiration ranged 373.3 to 594.3 mm.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
Seasonal ET valuese0
Value
373.3 to 594.3 mme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seasonal ET values calculated according to the soil-water budget method ranged from 373.3 to 594.3 mm in the 1st year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal evapotranspiration ranged 363.6 to 603.0.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
Seasonal ET valuese0
Value
363.6 to 603.0e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seasonal ET values calculated according to the soil-water budget method ranged from 373.3 to 594.3 mm in the 1st year and from 363.6 to 603.0 in the 2nd year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty percent water stress significantly decreased seasonal evapotranspiration.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
50 % water stresse0
Outcome
Seasonal ETe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seasonal ET underwent a significant decrease in the subjects receiving 50 % water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased yield by 39 % in 2023.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
39 %e0
Qualifier
2023e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress, decreases in yield by 39 % and 42 %, on average, were recorded in 2023 and 2024, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased yield by 42 % in 2024.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
42 %e0
Qualifier
2024e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress, decreases in yield by 39 % and 42 %, on average, were recorded in 2023 and 2024, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress negatively affected fruit number, fruit weight, fruit length.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
fruit number, fruit weight, fruit lengthe0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress, decreases in yield by 39 % and 42 %, on average, were recorded in 2023 and 2024, respectively. In addition, it negatively affected agro-morphological characteristics such as fruit number, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, and rind thickness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress negatively affected fruit width, and rind thickness.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
fruit width, and rind thicknesse0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress, decreases in yield by 39 % and 42 %, on average, were recorded in 2023 and 2024, respectively. In addition, it negatively affected agro-morphological characteristics such as fruit number, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, and rind thickness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly increased melon pH and soluble solid content.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
pH and soluble solid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pH and soluble solid content in melon exposed to water stress significantly increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sürmeli F1 (G3) performed well for yield components under both water regimes.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
Sürmeli F1 (G3)e0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Qualifier
under both well-watered and water deficit conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sürmeli F1 (G3) and Westeros F1 (G4) hybrid varieties showed a good performance in terms of yield components under both well-watered and water deficit conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Westeros F1 (G4) performed well for yield components under both water regimes.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
Westeros F1 (G4)e0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Qualifier
under both well-watered and water deficit conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sürmeli F1 (G3) and Westeros F1 (G4) hybrid varieties showed a good performance in terms of yield components under both well-watered and water deficit conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G3 had higher water crop productivity under full irrigation than standard cultivars and inbred lines.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
G3e0
Treatment
I 100e0
Outcome
water crop productivity (WPc)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
standard cultivars and inbred line genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the I 100 treatment, the water crop productivity (WPc) of G3 and G4 was found to be higher than that of the standard cultivars and inbred line genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G4 had higher water crop productivity under full irrigation than standard cultivars and inbred lines.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
G4e0
Treatment
I 100e0
Outcome
water crop productivity (WPc)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
standard cultivars and inbred line genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the I 100 treatment, the water crop productivity (WPc) of G3 and G4 was found to be higher than that of the standard cultivars and inbred line genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under I 50, G4 had the highest water crop productivity.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
G4e0
Treatment
I 50e0
Outcome
WPce0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under I 50 conditions, however, genotype G4 achieved the highest WPc, followed by G57, G62, G70, and G58.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1643 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G15 was identified as water-stress tolerant based on yield components.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
G15e0
Outcome
water-stress tolerant genotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes G15, G40, G37, G62, and G79 and hybrid varieties G3 and G4, which occupied the same region on the PCA plot, were identified as water-stress tolerant genotypes based on yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G40 was identified as water-stress tolerant based on yield components.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
G40e0
Outcome
water-stress tolerant genotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes G15, G40, G37, G62, and G79 and hybrid varieties G3 and G4, which occupied the same region on the PCA plot, were identified as water-stress tolerant genotypes based on yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G37 was identified as water-stress tolerant based on yield components.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
G37e0
Outcome
water-stress tolerant genotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes G15, G40, G37, G62, and G79 and hybrid varieties G3 and G4, which occupied the same region on the PCA plot, were identified as water-stress tolerant genotypes based on yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G62 was identified as water-stress tolerant based on yield components.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
G62e0
Outcome
water-stress tolerant genotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes G15, G40, G37, G62, and G79 and hybrid varieties G3 and G4, which occupied the same region on the PCA plot, were identified as water-stress tolerant genotypes based on yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G79 was identified as water-stress tolerant based on yield components.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
G79e0
Outcome
water-stress tolerant genotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes G15, G40, G37, G62, and G79 and hybrid varieties G3 and G4, which occupied the same region on the PCA plot, were identified as water-stress tolerant genotypes based on yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G3 was identified as water-stress tolerant based on yield components.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
G3e0
Outcome
water-stress tolerant genotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes G15, G40, G37, G62, and G79 and hybrid varieties G3 and G4, which occupied the same region on the PCA plot, were identified as water-stress tolerant genotypes based on yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G4 was identified as water-stress tolerant based on yield components.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
G4e0
Outcome
water-stress tolerant genotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes G15, G40, G37, G62, and G79 and hybrid varieties G3 and G4, which occupied the same region on the PCA plot, were identified as water-stress tolerant genotypes based on yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon (Cucumis melo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

16 papers: 3 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.