Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity: A modeling approach for irrigation and cultivar selection across different agro-climatic zones of Egypt

Maha L. Elsayed; Ahmed F. Elkot; Tahany Noreldin; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Egypt, a major wheat importer, grapples with significant food security concerns exacerbated by limited water resources and climate variability. This study investigates strategies to optimize wheat yield and water productivity across Egypt’s diverse agro-climatic zones through precise irrigation management and cultivar selection. Using the DSSAT CERES-Wheat model, calibrated with field data from experiments on three wheat cultivars (Sakha94, Shandweel1 and Sids1) under five irrigation treatments across four locations, we evaluated the impact of irrigation frequency and elevated CO₂ levels (390 ppm) on grain yield and water-use efficiency. Results show that frequent irrigation (50 % depletion) increases yield by up to 22 % compared to less frequent irrigation (90 % depletion), particularly for Sakha94, while reduced irrigation enhances water productivity based irrigation (WP_Irrigation), with Shandweel1 and Sids1 achieving 15–20 % higher WP under water-limited conditions. Elevated CO₂ contributes a modest yield increase of approximately 5 % and enhances WP, indicating potential adaptive benefits in future high-CO₂ scenarios. Sensitivity analysis revealed that moderate CO₂ enrichment (+420–440 ppm) combined with + 1°C to + 2°C increases yield and WP by 10–25 %, but higher temperatures (+3°C) shortened growth cycles and reduced benefits, particularly for heat-sensitive cultivars like Sakha94. Linear mixed model analysis further reveals distinct fixed and random effects, underscoring that strategic irrigation management can effectively balance yield maximization and water conservation. These findings highlight the necessity of location-specific irrigation and cultivar strategies to alleviate water scarcity. Future research should prioritize a multi-model ensemble approach to quantify uncertainties, integrate CMIP6 climate projections and explore multi-factor environmental impacts, supporting sustainable wheat production in water-limited regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In the DSSAT simulations, frequent irrigation (50 % depletion) increased wheat yield by up to 22 % relative to less frequent irrigation (90 % depletion), particularly for Sakha94.

Material
Sakha94e1
Treatment
frequent irrigation (50 % depletion)e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
22 %e1
Comparator
less frequent irrigation (90 % depletion)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“frequent irrigation (50 % depletion) increases yield by up to 22 % compared to less frequent irrigation (90 % depletion), particularly for Sakha94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–810 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Shandweel1 achieved 15–20 % higher water productivity under water-limited conditions with reduced irrigation.

Material
Shandweel1e2
Treatment
reduced irrigatione2
Outcome
WPe2
Direction
highere2
Value
15–20 %e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“reduced irrigation enhances water productivity based irrigation (WP_Irrigation), with Shandweel1 and Sids1 achieving 15–20 % higher WP under water-limited conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–983 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Sids1 achieved 15–20 % higher water productivity under water-limited conditions with reduced irrigation.

Material
Sids1e2
Treatment
reduced irrigatione2
Outcome
WPe2
Direction
highere2
Value
15–20 %e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“reduced irrigation enhances water productivity based irrigation (WP_Irrigation), with Shandweel1 and Sids1 achieving 15–20 % higher WP under water-limited conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased wheat yield by approximately 5 % in the simulations.

Treatment
Elevated CO₂e3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Value
approximately 5 %e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e3

“Elevated CO₂ contributes a modest yield increase of approximately 5 % and enhances WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 enhanced wheat water productivity in the simulations.

Treatment
Elevated CO₂e3
Outcome
WPe3
Direction
enhancese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e3

“Elevated CO₂ contributes a modest yield increase of approximately 5 % and enhances WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate CO2 enrichment combined with a 1 to 2 °C warming increased wheat yield and water productivity by 10–25 % in the sensitivity analysis.

Treatment
moderate CO₂ enrichment (+420–440 ppm) combined with + 1°C to + 2°Ce4
Outcome
yield and WPe4
Direction
increasese4
Value
10–25 %e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“moderate CO₂ enrichment (+420–440 ppm) combined with + 1°C to + 2°C increases yield and WP by 10–25 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A +3 °C temperature increase shortened wheat growth cycles, particularly in the heat-sensitive cultivar Sakha94.

Material
Sakha94e5
Treatment
higher temperatures (+3°C)e5
Outcome
growth cyclese5
Direction
shortenede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e5

“higher temperatures (+3°C) shortened growth cycles and reduced benefits, particularly for heat-sensitive cultivars like Sakha94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A +3 °C temperature increase reduced the benefits of elevated CO2 and warming for wheat.

Treatment
higher temperatures (+3°C)e5
Outcome
benefitse5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e5

“higher temperatures (+3°C) shortened growth cycles and reduced benefits, particularly for heat-sensitive cultivars like Sakha94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1410 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that strategic irrigation management can effectively balance wheat yield maximization and water conservation.

Outcome
yield maximization and water conservatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“underscoring that strategic irrigation management can effectively balance yield maximization and water conservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1606 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend location-specific irrigation and cultivar strategies to alleviate wheat water scarcity.

Outcome
water scarcitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimizing wheat yield and water productivity under water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e7

“These findings highlight the necessity of location-specific irrigation and cultivar strategies to alleviate water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1730 · show in text ↑

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.