Paper · 2025 · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research

Cadmium allocation to grains depends on sulfur nutrition in durum wheat

Agathe Vidal; Valentin Dubois; Sophie Brunel-Muguet; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if the allocation of cadmium (Cd) to grains depends on sulfur (S) nutrition in durum wheat. Durum wheat was grown in semi-hydroponics with 100 nM Cd (Cd+) or at a background concentration of Cd (Cd-). Starting from stem elongation, the plants exposed to 100 nM Cd received a standard supply of S (S100), a reduced supply of S (S20) or were subjected to S deprivation (S0). Plants were sampled at the early milk development stage (Z71) and the early ripening stage (Z91) to assess differences in plant growth, Cd uptake and partitioning among organs, as well as net remobilization of Cd in the different treatments. Durum wheat growth was not affected by exposure to 100 nM Cd, and the root-to-shoot translocation of Cd was more restricted in the Cd + treatment than in the Cd-treatment. Reducing or stopping the supply of S did not affect durum wheat growth but enhanced S remobilization from almost all plant parts, including the roots. Stopping the supply of S resulted in a 35 % increase in the concentration of Cd in the grains. The proportional decrease in the concentrations of S and Cd in the roots of S-deficient plants between Z71 and Z91 suggests that Cd remobilization is associated with S remobilization in the roots of durum wheat. Sulfur deficiency promoted Cd accumulation in durum wheat grains likely due to enhanced remobilization of S and Cd in the roots of S-deficient plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure to 100 nM Cd did not affect durum wheat growth.

Treatment
exposure to 100 nM Cde0
Outcome
Durum wheat growthe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“Durum wheat growth was not affected by exposure to 100 nM Cd, and the root-to-shoot translocation of Cd was more restricted in the Cd + treatment than in the Cd-treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-to-shoot Cd translocation was more restricted under Cd + than Cd-.

Treatment
Cd + treatmente0
Outcome
root-to-shoot translocation of Cde0
Direction
more restrictede0
Comparator
Cd-treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“Durum wheat growth was not affected by exposure to 100 nM Cd, and the root-to-shoot translocation of Cd was more restricted in the Cd + treatment than in the Cd-treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing or stopping S supply did not affect durum wheat growth.

Treatment
Reducing or stopping the supply of Se0
Outcome
durum wheat growthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reducing or stopping the supply of S did not affect durum wheat growth but enhanced S remobilization from almost all plant parts, including the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing or stopping S supply enhanced S remobilization from almost all plant parts, including roots.

Treatment
Reducing or stopping the supply of Se0
Outcome
S remobilizatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
almost all plant parts, including the rootse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reducing or stopping the supply of S did not affect durum wheat growth but enhanced S remobilization from almost all plant parts, including the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stopping S supply increased grain Cd concentration by 35 %.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
Stopping the supply of Se0
Outcome
concentration of Cd in the grainse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
35 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stopping the supply of S resulted in a 35 % increase in the concentration of Cd in the grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1070 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root S and Cd concentrations decreased proportionally between Z71 and Z91 in S-deficient durum wheat.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
concentrations of S and Cd in the rootse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
between Z71 and Z91e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportional decrease in the concentrations of S and Cd in the roots of S-deficient plants between Z71 and Z91 suggests that Cd remobilization is associated with S remobilization in the roots of durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1282 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root Cd remobilization was associated with root S remobilization.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Compound
Se0
Outcome
Cd remobilizatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportional decrease in the concentrations of S and Cd in the roots of S-deficient plants between Z71 and Z91 suggests that Cd remobilization is associated with S remobilization in the roots of durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1282 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur deficiency likely promoted grain Cd accumulation through enhanced root S and Cd remobilization.

Treatment
Sulfur deficiencye0
Outcome
Cd accumulation in durum wheat grainse0
Qualifier
likely due to enhanced remobilization of S and Cd in the roots of S-deficient plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfur deficiency promoted Cd accumulation in durum wheat grains likely due to enhanced remobilization of S and Cd in the roots of S-deficient plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1433 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.