Paper · 2025 · Horticulture Advances

Physiological insights into the responses of tea plants to aluminum through an integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis

Xinwan Zhang; Shijie Luo; Xiali Ye; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Tea plants ( Camellia sinensis ) demonstrate significant tolerance to aluminum (Al) and even require it for optimal growth. However, the mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. This study explored the responses of tea plants to varying Al concentrations at both metabolomic and transcriptomic levels. Compared to 0 mM Al treatment, low Al concentrations (0.4 mM) enhanced root vitality by 8.91%, while higher Al concentrations (10 and 100 mM) reduced root vigor by 19.31% and 76.81%, respectively. In a similar pattern, the electron transfer rate in leaves remained stable under low Al levels but significantly decreased under high Al conditions. Transcriptomic analysis showed a downregulation of genes associated with DNA replication in both Al-deficient and Al-toxic conditions, suggesting that Al may play an essential role in maintaining genomic stability during tea plant growth. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified 84 hub genes potentially involved in Al tolerance, including aluminum sensitive 3 ( CsALS3 ), xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase protein 23 ( CsXTH23 ), and arginine decarboxylase 2 ( CsADC2 ). Metabolomic analysis revealed that high Al concentrations suppressed pathways related to amino acid, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolism, yet several metabolites, such as putrescine, histidine, and epigallocatechin, were upregulated under high Al conditions. Combined pathway analysis indicated an upregulation of the putrescine biosynthetic pathway under high Al, highlighting its critical role in Al detoxification in tea plants. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of effects from Al on tea plant physiology, offering molecular and physiological insights into Al tolerance mechanisms and theoretical bases for optimizing tea cultivation in acidic soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low 0.4 mM aluminum enhanced tea root vitality by 8.91% versus 0 mM.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
low Al concentrations (0.4 mM)e0
Outcome
root vitalitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
8.91%e0
Comparator
0 mM Al treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 0 mM Al treatment, low Al concentrations (0.4 mM) enhanced root vitality by 8.91%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum at 10 mM reduced tea root vigor by 19.31%.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Treatment
10e0
Outcome
root vigore0
Direction
reducede0
Value
19.31%e0
Comparator
0 mM Al treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“higher Al concentrations (10 and 100 mM) reduced root vigor by 19.31% and 76.81%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to 0 mM Al treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum at 100 mM reduced tea root vigor by 76.81%.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Treatment
100 mMe0
Outcome
root vigore0
Direction
reducede0
Value
76.81%e0
Comparator
0 mM Al treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“higher Al concentrations (10 and 100 mM) reduced root vigor by 19.31% and 76.81%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to 0 mM Al treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea leaf electron transfer rate remained stable at low aluminum.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
low Al levelse0
Outcome
electron transfer ratee0
Direction
remained stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the electron transfer rate in leaves remained stable under low Al levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea leaf electron transfer rate significantly decreased at high aluminum.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
high Al conditionse0
Outcome
electron transfer ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the electron transfer rate in leaves remained stable under low Al levels but significantly decreased under high Al conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DNA replication associated genes were downregulated in aluminum-deficient tea conditions.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Treatment
Al-deficiente0
Outcome
genes associated with DNA replicatione0
Direction
downregulatione0

Verbatim

e0

“downregulation of genes associated with DNA replication in both Al-deficient and Al-toxic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DNA replication associated genes were downregulated in aluminum-toxic tea conditions.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Treatment
Al-toxic conditionse0
Outcome
genes associated with DNA replicatione0
Direction
downregulatione0

Verbatim

e0

“downregulation of genes associated with DNA replication in both Al-deficient and Al-toxic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WGCNA identified 84 candidate aluminum tolerance hub genes in tea.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Gene
CsALS3e0
Outcome
hub genes potentially involved in Al tolerancee0
Value
84 hub genese0

Verbatim

e0

“identified 84 hub genes potentially involved in Al tolerance, including aluminum sensitive 3 ( CsALS3 ), xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase protein 23 ( CsXTH23 ), and arginine decarboxylase 2 ( CsADC2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High aluminum suppressed tea amino acid, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolism pathways.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Treatment
high Al concentrationse0
Outcome
pathways related to amino acid, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolisme0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“high Al concentrations suppressed pathways related to amino acid, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High aluminum upregulated tea putrescine, histidine, and epigallocatechin.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Treatment
high Al conditionse0
Outcome
putrescine, histidine, and epigallocatechine0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“putrescine, histidine, and epigallocatechin, were upregulated under high Al conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The putrescine biosynthetic pathway was upregulated under high aluminum in tea.

Taxon
Tea plantst0
Treatment
high Ale0
Outcome
putrescine biosynthetic pathwaye0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“upregulation of the putrescine biosynthetic pathway under high Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results differ

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

aluminium atom · molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.