Paper · 2025 · Plant Stress

Mitigating salt stress in Lens culinaris: The protective mechanism of Rhizobium in enhancing growth, photosynthesis, and antioxidant defense system

Rinkee Kumari; Ekta Pandey; Shahla Faizan; et al.

15
claims
41
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

• Salt stress severely hampers lentil growth and photosynthesis. • Rhizobium inoculation mitigates salt stress by antioxidant defense system. • Enhances photosynthetic pigments and leghemoglobin content, improving nitrogen fixation and plant metabolism under salinity. • Promotes ACC deaminase activity and IAA production, enhancing root architecture and nutrient uptake. Agricultural soil contamination, particularly salinization, poses a significant and growing threat to global crop productivity, thereby necessitating the development of sustainable strategies to mitigate its adverse effects. This study investigates the potential of Rhizobium inoculation to alleviate the detrimental impact of salinity stress on Lens culinaris . Rhizobium plays a crucial role in legume development through symbiotic nitrogen fixation and may also enhance plant growth under stress conditions by engaging in complex biochemical interactions. However, research on its ability to activate abiotic stress signaling pathways and induce physiological changes in plants remains limited. To address this, L. culinaris plants were subjected to varying concentrations of NaCl (50 mM and 150 mM) at 20 days post-germination, with and without Rhizobium inoculation. For inoculation, 100 g of jaggery or sugar was dissolved in 500 ml of water, boiled, cooled, and then used to mix the Rhizobium culture. This mixture was used to coat lentil seeds, which were air-dried in the shade before sowing. Salt stress significantly reduced plant growth, physiological parameters, and yield. In contrast, Rhizobium inoculation improved reactive oxygen species (ROS) balance and enhanced the activities of key antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 21.0%, catalase (CAT) by 11.34%, and peroxidase (POD) by 10.43%. Additionally, photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content were increased by 10.08%, stomatal conductance was improved, and leghemoglobin content rose by 15.90%. Protein and proline levels were elevated by 18.31% and 32.57%, respectively. Moreover, membrane stability was enhanced, sodium accumulation was reduced, and overall yield and stomatal behavior were optimized under saline conditions. Rhizobium inoculation also directly supported ACC deaminase (ACCD) activity and increased indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production in both plant tissues and bacterial isolates. These findings underscore the potential of Rhizobium in mitigating salt-induced damage in L. culinaris by modulating antioxidant enzyme systems, enhancing photosynthetic performance, and promoting redox homeostasis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced lentil growth, physiological parameters and yield.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
plant growth, physiological parameters, and yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress significantly reduced plant growth, physiological parameters, and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation improved ROS balance.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
reactive oxygen species (ROS) balancee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium inoculation improved reactive oxygen species (ROS) balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation enhanced superoxide dismutase activity by 21.0%.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
21.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the activities of key antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 21.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1742 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation enhanced catalase activity by 11.34%.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
11.34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the activities of key antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 21.0%, catalase (CAT) by 11.34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1768 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation enhanced peroxidase activity by 10.43%.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
peroxidase (POD)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
10.43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the activities of key antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 21.0%, catalase (CAT) by 11.34%, and peroxidase (POD) by 10.43%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1800 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content increased by 10.08% with Rhizobium inoculation.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.08%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content were increased by 10.08%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1884 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation improved stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal conductance was improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1919 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leghemoglobin content rose by 15.90% with Rhizobium inoculation.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
leghemoglobin contente0
Direction
rosee0
Value
15.90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leghemoglobin content rose by 15.90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–1961 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein levels rose by 18.31% with Rhizobium inoculation.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
Proteine0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
18.31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein and proline levels were elevated by 18.31% and 32.57%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2038 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline levels rose by 32.57% with Rhizobium inoculation.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
proline levelse0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
32.57%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein and proline levels were elevated by 18.31% and 32.57%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2038 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation enhanced membrane stability.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
membrane stabilitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“membrane stability was enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2081 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation reduced sodium accumulation.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
sodium accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium accumulation was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2083–2114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation optimized yield and stomatal behavior under salinity.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
overall yield and stomatal behaviore0
Direction
optimizede0
Qualifier
under saline conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“overall yield and stomatal behavior were optimized under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2194 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation supported ACC deaminase activity.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
ACC deaminase (ACCD) activitye0
Direction
supportede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium inoculation also directly supported ACC deaminase (ACCD) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2196–2271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation increased IAA production in plant tissues and bacterial isolates.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) productione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both plant tissues and bacterial isolatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium inoculation also directly supported ACC deaminase (ACCD) activity and increased indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production in both plant tissues and bacterial isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2196–2368 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · molecular: metabolites · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Rhizobium · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.