Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) can beneficially modulate rhizosphere microbial communities, potentially improving plant health and reducing disease incidence. Limited research exists on the influence of PGPB inoculation on the rhizosphere microbial communities of apple plants, particularly in soils affected by apple replant disease (ARD). Here, we evaluated the capacity of GFP-labelled Priestia megaterium B1 (designated as P. megaterium B1L5) to colonize the roots of apple plantlets grown in two soils: ARD-affected soil and ARD-unaffected grass soil. We investigated its influence on plant growth in ARD-affected soil and its potential to mitigate ARD-related symptoms. We also assessed how its inoculation modulates the rhizosphere microbial communities, with emphasis on changes that may support plant health, particularly in ARD-affected soils. RESULTS: P. megaterium B1L5 successfully colonized apple roots in both soils 6 days post-inoculation (dpi), but was not detectable at 33 dpi. In ARD-affected soil, plants inoculated with vegetative cells or spores displayed a lower proportion of blackened root tips compared to uninoculated controls. Beta diversity and PERMANOVA analyses demonstrated a significant influence of inoculation on the bacterial communities in both soils at 6 and 33 dpi (p = 0.001). Furthermore, inoculation enriched the rhizosphere of apple plantlets with potential plant-beneficial bacteria, such as Luteimonas, Lysobacter, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Sphingobacterium, Rhodanobacter, Pedobacter and Flavobacterium. In contrast, fungal communities remained largely unaffected by inoculation. Most bacterial and fungal shifts observed in the rhizosphere of inoculated plantlets at 33 dpi did not exhibit similar patterns in uninoculated controls over time, indicating that these shifts were largely driven by the inoculum rather than by plant development or natural microbial succession. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the capacity of P. megaterium B1L5’s to transiently colonize apple plant roots across different soil environments. The observed tendency toward reduced root tip blackening in inoculated plants grown in ARD-affected plants reflects its potential for alleviating stress associated with ARD. Additionally, inoculation with P. megaterium B1L5 promoted beneficial shifts in the rhizosphere microbiome by enriching bacterial taxa commonly linked to plant health. These findings indicate that P. megaterium B1L5 presents a candidate for ARD mitigation, however its long-term efficacy and practical application should be further evaluated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. megaterium B1L5 colonized apple roots in both soils at 6 days after inoculation.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Interactor
P. megaterium B1L5Priestia megateriume0symbiont
Outcome
successfully colonized apple rootse0
Qualifier
both soils 6 days post-inoculation (dpi)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. megaterium B1L5 successfully colonized apple roots in both soils 6 days post-inoculation (dpi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–980 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. megaterium B1L5 was undetectable on apple roots at 33 dpi.

Interactor
P. megaterium B1L5Priestia megateriume0symbiont
Outcome
not detectable at 33 dpie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. megaterium B1L5 successfully colonized apple roots in both soils 6 days post-inoculation (dpi), but was not detectable at 33 dpi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative cell inoculation lowered blackened root tip proportion in ARD soil relative to controls.

Treatment
vegetative cellse0
Interactor
vegetative cellse0symbiont
Outcome
proportion of blackened root tipse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0
Setting
ARD-affected soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In ARD-affected soil, plants inoculated with vegetative cells or spores displayed a lower proportion of blackened root tips compared to uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spore inoculation lowered blackened root tip proportion in ARD soil relative to controls.

Treatment
sporese0
Interactor
Priestia megaterium B1L5Priestia megateriumt0symbiont
Outcome
proportion of blackened root tipse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0
Setting
ARD-affected soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In ARD-affected soil, plants inoculated with vegetative cells or spores displayed a lower proportion of blackened root tips compared to uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Transient colonization by Priestia megaterium B1L5 alters the structure of the rhizosphere microbiome towards potential plant beneficial bacterial groups in apple plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly altered apple rhizosphere bacterial communities in both soils at 6 and 33 dpi.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
bacterial communitiese0
Value
p = 0.001e0
Qualifier
both soils at 6 and 33 dpie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beta diversity and PERMANOVA analyses demonstrated a significant influence of inoculation on the bacterial communities in both soils at 6 and 33 dpi (p = 0.001).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation enriched potential beneficial bacteria in apple rhizospheres.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
potential plant-beneficial bacteriae0
Direction
enrichede0
Qualifier
Luteimonas, Lysobacter, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Sphingobacterium, Rhodanobacter, Pedobacter and Flavobacteriume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, inoculation enriched the rhizosphere of apple plantlets with potential plant-beneficial bacteria, such as Luteimonas, Lysobacter, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Sphingobacterium, Rhodanobacter, Pedobacter and Flavobacterium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple rhizosphere fungal communities were largely unaffected by inoculation.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
fungal communitiese0
Direction
largely unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, fungal communities remained largely unaffected by inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1646 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–172 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most 33 dpi microbial shifts in inoculated apple rhizospheres lacked similar patterns in uninoculated controls.

Outcome
bacterial and fungal shiftse0
Direction
did not exhibit similar patternse0
Qualifier
33 dpie0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most bacterial and fungal shifts observed in the rhizosphere of inoculated plantlets at 33 dpi did not exhibit similar patterns in uninoculated controls over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–172 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer the 33 dpi microbial shifts were driven primarily by the inoculum.

Outcome
these shiftse0
Qualifier
largely driven by the inoculume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicating that these shifts were largely driven by the inoculum rather than by plant development or natural microbial succession.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–1941 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–172 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identify P. megaterium B1L5 as a candidate for ARD mitigation requiring long term evaluation.

Interactor
P. megaterium B1L5Priestia megateriume0symbiont
Outcome
candidate for ARD mitigatione0
Qualifier
long-term efficacy and practical application should be further evaluatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These findings indicate that P. megaterium B1L5 presents a candidate for ARD mitigation, however its long-term efficacy and practical application should be further evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2434–2608 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–172 · show in text ↑

inoculation · soil: biology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.