Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Live bacterial inoculants affected the plant and soil microbiome more strongly than their volatiles, especially roots.

A claim from Plant microbiome responses to bioinoculants and volatiles · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Live bacterial inoculants affected the plant and soil microbiome more strongly than their volatiles, especially roots.

Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
live bacterial inoculantse1
Interactor
bacterial inoculantse1symbiont
Outcome
plant and soil microbiomee1
Direction
strongere1
Comparator
their volatilese1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple plant and soil microbiome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–495
e1

“The live bacterial inoculants as compared to their volatiles had a stronger effect on the plant and soil microbiome, particularly the root microbial community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–877

Title

Plant microbiome responses to bioinoculants and volatiles

Expedito Olimi; Martina Duller; Martina Stangl; et al. Environmental Microbiome 2025. doi:10.1186/s40793-025-00715-4

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-596fffa166c277d7eb1c5ad38ccc4d03f2d2799e0c509a58789dd712e9b45f2f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · soil: biology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.