Paper · 2025 · Biology

Comparative Enzymatic and Gene Expression Responses in Wheat to DON- and NIV-Producing Fusarium Species

Gabriela da Rocha Lemos Mendes; Paulo Cesar Pazdiora; Vivian Ebeling Viana; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major threat to wheat production that is caused by toxigenic species of the Fusarium graminearum complex. This study aimed to investigate the biochemical and molecular defense responses of Brazilian wheat genotypes (BRS 194, BRS Parrudo, and Frontana) with contrasting FHB susceptibilities following inoculation with F. graminearum (deoxynivalenol producer) and F. meridionale (nivalenol producer). Temporal patterns of antioxidant enzymes, defense-related enzymes, and gene expression (ABC-Transporter and Ca2+-ATPase) were analyzed from 12 to 96 h after inoculation. The ANOVA results revealed significant effects of genotypes, inoculation, and time after inoculation on most of the evaluated enzymatic activities. Frontana exhibited high basal activity for most enzymes, and after inoculation, the enzyme activity was higher than in other genotypes. BRS 194 presented delayed and fragmented activation patterns, particularly under DON-producing pathogen infection. According to the transcriptome results, inoculation with the NIV-producing pathogen upregulated both genes, reaching up to an 18-fold increase. BRS 194 showed an upregulated transcript pattern from the early hours after inoculation. Frontana showed increased transcript levels, reaching 12-fold, under DON-producing pathogen infection. These findings show that biochemical and molecular responses varied depending on genotype and the chemotype of the Fusarium isolate, highlighting the importance of early, coordinated defense activation in FHB resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frontana had high basal activity for most enzymes.

Material
Frontanae5
Outcome
basal activity for most enzymese5
Qualifier
highe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major threat to wheat production that is caused by toxigenic species of the Fusarium graminearum complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e5

“Frontana exhibited high basal activity for most enzymes, and after inoculation, the enzyme activity was higher than in other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After inoculation, enzyme activity in Frontana was higher than in other genotypes.

Material
Frontanae5
Treatment
inoculatione5
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume2pathogen
Second interactor
F. meridionaleFusarium meridionalee2pathogen
Outcome
enzyme activitye5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
other genotypese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major threat to wheat production that is caused by toxigenic species of the Fusarium graminearum complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“following inoculation with F. graminearum (deoxynivalenol producer) and F. meridionale (nivalenol producer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–429 · show in text ↑
e5

“Frontana exhibited high basal activity for most enzymes, and after inoculation, the enzyme activity was higher than in other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS 194 showed delayed and fragmented activation patterns, particularly under DON-producing pathogen infection.

Material
BRS 194e6
Treatment
DON-producing pathogen infectione6
Interactor
DON-producing pathogene6pathogen
Outcome
activation patternse6
Qualifier
delayed and fragmentede6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major threat to wheat production that is caused by toxigenic species of the Fusarium graminearum complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e6

“BRS 194 presented delayed and fragmented activation patterns, particularly under DON-producing pathogen infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with the NIV-producing pathogen upregulated both genes, reaching up to an 18-fold increase.

Treatment
inoculation with the NIV-producing pathogene7
Interactor
NIV-producing pathogene7pathogen
Gene
ABC-Transporter and Ca2+-ATPasee3
Outcome
gene expressione3
Direction
upregulatede7
Value
18-folde7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major threat to wheat production that is caused by toxigenic species of the Fusarium graminearum complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e3

“Temporal patterns of antioxidant enzymes, defense-related enzymes, and gene expression (ABC-Transporter and Ca2+-ATPase) were analyzed from 12 to 96 h after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–599 · show in text ↑
e7

“According to the transcriptome results, inoculation with the NIV-producing pathogen upregulated both genes, reaching up to an 18-fold increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS 194 showed an upregulated transcript pattern from the early hours after inoculation.

Material
BRS 194e2
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
transcript patterne2
Direction
upregulatede2
Qualifier
from the early hourse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major threat to wheat production that is caused by toxigenic species of the Fusarium graminearum complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“BRS 194 showed an upregulated transcript pattern from the early hours after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frontana showed increased transcript levels, reaching 12-fold, under DON-producing pathogen infection.

Material
Frontanae2
Treatment
DON-producing pathogen infectione2
Interactor
DON-producing pathogene2pathogen
Outcome
transcript levelse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
12-folde2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major threat to wheat production that is caused by toxigenic species of the Fusarium graminearum complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“Frontana showed increased transcript levels, reaching 12-fold, under DON-producing pathogen infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1334 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype, inoculation and time after inoculation had significant effects on most of the evaluated enzymatic activities.

Outcome
enzymatic activitiese4
Qualifier
significant effects of genotypes, inoculation, and time after inoculatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major threat to wheat production that is caused by toxigenic species of the Fusarium graminearum complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e4

“The ANOVA results revealed significant effects of genotypes, inoculation, and time after inoculation on most of the evaluated enzymatic activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–747 · show in text ↑

infection · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.