Paper · 2024 · Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture

Effect of foliar application of nutrients and growth regulators on productivity, nutrient uptake of summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)

Arjun Prusti; A K Behura; A M Prusti; et al.

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Chhatabar farm of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences , Siksha “O” Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, under East and South-Eastern Coastal Plain Agro-climatic zone of Odisha during summer season of 2021on sandy loam soil to evaluate the foliar spray (FS) once ( 30DAS) or twice ( 30 and 45 days after sowing) of water soluble nutrients NPK 19:19:19, micronutrient boron, growth regulators salicylic acid (SA), naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) and brassinolide (BR) on yield and yield attributing characters of Green gram. Application of RDF(20:40:20:20 Kg N:P2O5:K2O:S/ha) + 2 FS NPK(19:19:19) @ 2 % spray recorded the highest seed yield (1201 kg/ha) which was at par with RDF + 2FS of B, RDF + 2FS BR, RDF +1FS of B, and RDF + 1FS NPK. Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram, increased the N, P and K content as well as N, P and K uptake of both seed and stover, enriched protein content in seed, enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone. Among them RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DAS recorded maximum seed yield, high protein (23.13%) containing seed, high nutrient content, uptake, and available nutrient (N, P and K)of soil could be recommended to enhance seed yield, yield attributes, quality parameters, nutrient uptake and soil nutrient status of summer green gram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus two NPK foliar sprays at 2% gave the highest green gram seed yield (1201 kg/ha).

Treatment
RDF(20:40:20:20 Kg N:P2O5:K2O:S/ha) + 2 FS NPK(19:19:19) @ 2 % spraye1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1201 kg/hae1
Setting
Chhatabar farme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Chhatabar farm of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of RDF(20:40:20:20 Kg N:P2O5:K2O:S/ha) + 2 FS NPK(19:19:19) @ 2 % spray recorded the highest seed yield (1201 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus foliar B, BR, or single NPK sprays gave green gram seed yield at par with the highest-yielding RDF plus two NPK sprays.

Treatment
RDF + 2FS of B, RDF + 2FS BR, RDF +1FS of B, and RDF + 1FS NPKe2
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
RDF(20:40:20:20 Kg N:P2O5:K2O:S/ha) + 2 FS NPK(19:19:19)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–136 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of RDF(20:40:20:20 Kg N:P2O5:K2O:S/ha) + 2 FS NPK(19:19:19) @ 2 % spray recorded the highest seed yield (1201 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–742 · show in text ↑
e2

“which was at par with RDF + 2FS of B, RDF + 2FS BR, RDF +1FS of B, and RDF + 1FS NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of water soluble nutrients and growth regulators gave better seed yield and yield attributes than soil RDF alone.

Treatment
Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulatorse3
Outcome
seed yield and yield attributing characterse3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
soil application (RDF) alonee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–982 · show in text ↑
e6

“enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrient and growth regulator application increased N, P and K content and uptake in green gram seed and stover compared with soil RDF alone.

Treatment
Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulatorse3
Outcome
N, P and K content as well as N, P and K uptakee4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
of both seed and stovere4
Comparator
soil application (RDF) alonee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–982 · show in text ↑
e4

“increased the N, P and K content as well as N, P and K uptake of both seed and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1069 · show in text ↑
e6

“enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrient and growth regulator application enriched protein content in green gram seed compared with soil RDF alone.

Treatment
Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulatorse3
Outcome
protein content in seede5
Direction
enrichede5
Comparator
soil application (RDF) alonee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–982 · show in text ↑
e5

“enriched protein content in seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1103 · show in text ↑
e6

“enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrient and growth regulator application enhanced available nutrient status of soil compared with soil RDF alone.

Treatment
Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulatorse3
Outcome
available nutrient status of soile6
Direction
enhancede6
Comparator
soil application (RDF) alonee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–982 · show in text ↑
e6

“enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrient and growth regulator application enhanced nutrient use efficiency of green gram compared with soil RDF alone.

Treatment
Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulatorse3
Outcome
nutrient use efficiencye6
Direction
enhancede6
Comparator
soil application (RDF) alonee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–982 · show in text ↑
e6

“enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus two NPK foliar sprays at 30 and 45 DAS gave the maximum green gram seed yield.

Treatment
RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DASe7
Outcome
seed yielde7
Direction
maximume7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–136 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among them RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DAS recorded maximum seed yield, high protein (23.13%) containing seed, high nutrient content, uptake, and available nutrient (N, P and K)of soil could be recommended to enhance seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus two NPK foliar sprays at 30 and 45 DAS gave high green gram seed protein (23.13%).

Treatment
RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DASe7
Outcome
proteine7
Direction
highe7
Value
23.13%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–136 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among them RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DAS recorded maximum seed yield, high protein (23.13%) containing seed, high nutrient content, uptake, and available nutrient (N, P and K)of soil could be recommended to enhance seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1484 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus two NPK foliar sprays at 30 and 45 DAS could be recommended to enhance green gram seed yield and nutrient status.

Outcome
RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DASe7
Qualifier
to enhance seed yielde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–136 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among them RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DAS recorded maximum seed yield, high protein (23.13%) containing seed, high nutrient content, uptake, and available nutrient (N, P and K)of soil could be recommended to enhance seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1484 · show in text ↑

brassinolide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

class · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 50 positive, 4 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

class · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.