Abstract
ABSTRACT A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Chhatabar farm of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences , Siksha “O” Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, under East and South-Eastern Coastal Plain Agro-climatic zone of Odisha during summer season of 2021on sandy loam soil to evaluate the foliar spray (FS) once ( 30DAS) or twice ( 30 and 45 days after sowing) of water soluble nutrients NPK 19:19:19, micronutrient boron, growth regulators salicylic acid (SA), naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) and brassinolide (BR) on yield and yield attributing characters of Green gram. Application of RDF(20:40:20:20 Kg N:P2O5:K2O:S/ha) + 2 FS NPK(19:19:19) @ 2 % spray recorded the highest seed yield (1201 kg/ha) which was at par with RDF + 2FS of B, RDF + 2FS BR, RDF +1FS of B, and RDF + 1FS NPK. Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram, increased the N, P and K content as well as N, P and K uptake of both seed and stover, enriched protein content in seed, enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone. Among them RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DAS recorded maximum seed yield, high protein (23.13%) containing seed, high nutrient content, uptake, and available nutrient (N, P and K)of soil could be recommended to enhance seed yield, yield attributes, quality parameters, nutrient uptake and soil nutrient status of summer green gram.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus two NPK foliar sprays at 2% gave the highest green gram seed yield (1201 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- Green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- RDF(20:40:20:20 Kg N:P2O5:K2O:S/ha) + 2 FS NPK(19:19:19) @ 2 % spraye1
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 1201 kg/hae1
- Setting
- Chhatabar farme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Chhatabar farm of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences”
e1“Application of RDF(20:40:20:20 Kg N:P2O5:K2O:S/ha) + 2 FS NPK(19:19:19) @ 2 % spray recorded the highest seed yield (1201 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus foliar B, BR, or single NPK sprays gave green gram seed yield at par with the highest-yielding RDF plus two NPK sprays.
- Taxon
- Green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- RDF + 2FS of B, RDF + 2FS BR, RDF +1FS of B, and RDF + 1FS NPKe2
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- at pare2
- Comparator
- RDF(20:40:20:20 Kg N:P2O5:K2O:S/ha) + 2 FS NPK(19:19:19)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
e1“Application of RDF(20:40:20:20 Kg N:P2O5:K2O:S/ha) + 2 FS NPK(19:19:19) @ 2 % spray recorded the highest seed yield (1201 kg/ha)”
e2“which was at par with RDF + 2FS of B, RDF + 2FS BR, RDF +1FS of B, and RDF + 1FS NPK”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application of water soluble nutrients and growth regulators gave better seed yield and yield attributes than soil RDF alone.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatae3 - Treatment
- Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulatorse3
- Outcome
- seed yield and yield attributing characterse3
- Direction
- bettere3
- Comparator
- soil application (RDF) alonee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram”
e6“enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar nutrient and growth regulator application increased N, P and K content and uptake in green gram seed and stover compared with soil RDF alone.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatae3 - Treatment
- Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulatorse3
- Outcome
- N, P and K content as well as N, P and K uptakee4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Qualifier
- of both seed and stovere4
- Comparator
- soil application (RDF) alonee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram”
e4“increased the N, P and K content as well as N, P and K uptake of both seed and stover”
e6“enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar nutrient and growth regulator application enriched protein content in green gram seed compared with soil RDF alone.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatae3 - Treatment
- Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulatorse3
- Outcome
- protein content in seede5
- Direction
- enrichede5
- Comparator
- soil application (RDF) alonee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram”
e5“enriched protein content in seed”
e6“enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar nutrient and growth regulator application enhanced available nutrient status of soil compared with soil RDF alone.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatae3 - Treatment
- Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulatorse3
- Outcome
- available nutrient status of soile6
- Direction
- enhancede6
- Comparator
- soil application (RDF) alonee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram”
e6“enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar nutrient and growth regulator application enhanced nutrient use efficiency of green gram compared with soil RDF alone.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatae3 - Treatment
- Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulatorse3
- Outcome
- nutrient use efficiencye6
- Direction
- enhancede6
- Comparator
- soil application (RDF) alonee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“Foliar application of water soluble nutrients, and growth regulators produced better effects on seed yield and yield attributing characters in green gram”
e6“enhanced available nutrient status of soil and nutrient use efficiency of summer green gram in comparison to soil application (RDF) alone”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus two NPK foliar sprays at 30 and 45 DAS gave the maximum green gram seed yield.
- Taxon
- Green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DASe7
- Outcome
- seed yielde7
- Direction
- maximume7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
e7“Among them RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DAS recorded maximum seed yield, high protein (23.13%) containing seed, high nutrient content, uptake, and available nutrient (N, P and K)of soil could be recommended to enhance seed yield”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus two NPK foliar sprays at 30 and 45 DAS gave high green gram seed protein (23.13%).
- Taxon
- Green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DASe7
- Outcome
- proteine7
- Direction
- highe7
- Value
- 23.13%e7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
e7“Among them RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DAS recorded maximum seed yield, high protein (23.13%) containing seed, high nutrient content, uptake, and available nutrient (N, P and K)of soil could be recommended to enhance seed yield”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus two NPK foliar sprays at 30 and 45 DAS could be recommended to enhance green gram seed yield and nutrient status.
- Taxon
- Green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Outcome
- RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DASe7
- Qualifier
- to enhance seed yielde7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“summer Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”
e7“Among them RDF + 2 FS NPK foliar spray at 30 and 45 DAS recorded maximum seed yield, high protein (23.13%) containing seed, high nutrient content, uptake, and available nutrient (N, P and K)of soil could be recommended to enhance seed yield”
The same questions in other papers
brassinolide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
175 papers more in this group
See all 179 papers →class · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
212 papers more in this group
See all 216 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
371 papers more in this group
See all 375 papers →class · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.