Paper · 2025 · FUDMA Journal of Sciences

EFFECT OF ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI ON PHOSPHORUS ABSORPTION AND YIELD OF COWPEA VARIETIES IN SOILS OF WUDIL AND WARAWA SUDAN SAVANNAH, NIGERIA

Muhammed Bello Adamu; N. A. Abdulkadir; G. N. Haris; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions in 2023 at Aliko Dangote University Wudil on sandy loam soils of Wudil and Warawa to evaluate the influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on yield of two cowpea varieties as well as on soil properties and Phosphorus uptake. The treatments consisted of two levels of AMF inoculation (Mo = control, without inoculation, M1 = inoculation with AMF), Two cowpea varieties (Sampea14 and Sampea15) and soils of two location (wudil and warawa). These were laid out in completely randomized design and replicated three times. Data were collected on seeds/pod, 100-seed weight, yield/ha and P uptake. Soil analysis was also carried out before and after the application of treatments. The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS and means were separated at 5% level of significance. Result showed significant effect of AMF on all the yield characters of cowpea (p<0.05). The inoculation of AMF produced higher yield/ha of sampea15 cowpea (874.56kg) than the control (550.42kg). However, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between yield of the two varieties of cowpea (644.13kg and 780.85kg) used in this study. The application of AMF enhanced the pH (0.22%), organic carbon (0.15%), organic matter content (0.62%) N (0.05%), P (0.16mg/kg) and K (0.18mg/kg) contents of the soil at Wudil and Warawa. Phosphorous uptake of the two cowpea varieties at both locations were also increased more than the control treatments. The study therefore recommends further experiments to study in detail the function of AMF on the...

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF significantly affected all cowpea yield characters.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
yield characterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Result showed significant effect of AMF on all the yield characters of cowpea (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation raised Sampea15 yield to 874.56kg versus 550.42kg control.

Material
sampea15e0
Treatment
inoculation of AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
yield/hae0
Direction
highere0
Value
874.56kge0
Qualifier
550.42kge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inoculation of AMF produced higher yield/ha of sampea15 cowpea (874.56kg) than the control (550.42kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1048 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two cowpea varieties did not significantly differ in yield.

Material
two varietiese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Qualifier
644.13kg and 780.85kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between yield of the two varieties of cowpea (644.13kg and 780.85kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF raised soil pH by 0.22%.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.22%e0
Setting
Wudil and Warawae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of AMF enhanced the pH (0.22%), organic carbon (0.15%), organic matter content (0.62%) N (0.05%), P (0.16mg/kg) and K (0.18mg/kg) contents of the soil at Wudil and Warawa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF raised soil organic carbon by 0.15%.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
organic carbone0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.15%e0
Setting
Wudil and Warawae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of AMF enhanced the pH (0.22%), organic carbon (0.15%), organic matter content (0.62%) N (0.05%), P (0.16mg/kg) and K (0.18mg/kg) contents of the soil at Wudil and Warawa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF raised soil organic matter by 0.62%.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
organic matter contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.62%e0
Setting
Wudil and Warawae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of AMF enhanced the pH (0.22%), organic carbon (0.15%), organic matter content (0.62%) N (0.05%), P (0.16mg/kg) and K (0.18mg/kg) contents of the soil at Wudil and Warawa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF raised soil N by 0.05%.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.05%e0
Setting
Wudil and Warawae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of AMF enhanced the pH (0.22%), organic carbon (0.15%), organic matter content (0.62%) N (0.05%), P (0.16mg/kg) and K (0.18mg/kg) contents of the soil at Wudil and Warawa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF raised soil P by 0.16mg/kg.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.16mg/kge0
Setting
Wudil and Warawae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of AMF enhanced the pH (0.22%), organic carbon (0.15%), organic matter content (0.62%) N (0.05%), P (0.16mg/kg) and K (0.18mg/kg) contents of the soil at Wudil and Warawa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF raised soil K by 0.18mg/kg.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.18mg/kge0
Setting
Wudil and Warawae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of AMF enhanced the pH (0.22%), organic carbon (0.15%), organic matter content (0.62%) N (0.05%), P (0.16mg/kg) and K (0.18mg/kg) contents of the soil at Wudil and Warawa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased cowpea phosphorus uptake at both locations relative to controls.

Treatment
ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGIt1
Interactor
ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGIt1symbiont
Outcome
Phosphorous uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
t1

“ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorous uptake of the two cowpea varieties at both locations were also increased more than the control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1498 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.