Paper · 2005

Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculation on Plant Growth and Phthalic Ester Degradation in Two Contaminated Soils

Chen Rui

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A 60-day pot experiment was carried out using di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) as a typical organic pollutant phthalic ester and cowpea (Vigna sinensis) as the host plant to determine the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on plant growth and degradation of DEHP in two contaminated soils, a yellow-brown soil and a red soil. The air-dried soils were uniformly sprayed with different concentrations of DEHP, inoculated or left uninoculated with an arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus, and planted with cowpea seeds. After 60 days the positive impact of AM inoculation on the growth of cowpea was more pronounced in the red soil than in the yellow-brown soil, with significantly higher (P 0.01) mycorrhizal colonization rate, shoot dry weight and total P content in shoot tissues for the red soil. Both in the yellow-brown and red soils, AM inoculation significantly (P 0.01) reduced shoot DEHP content, implying that AM inoculation could inhibit the uptake and translocation of DEHP from roots to the aboveground parts. However, with AM inoculation no positive contribution to the degradation of DEHP was found.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation improved cowpea growth more in red soil than yellow-brown soil.

Treatment
AM inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
yellow-brown soile0
Setting
red soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the positive impact of AM inoculation on the growth of cowpea was more pronounced in the red soil than in the yellow-brown soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–668 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization, shoot dry weight and shoot total P were significantly higher in red soil.

Outcome
mycorrhizal colonization rate, shoot dry weight and total P content in shoot tissuese0
Direction
highere0
Setting
red soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with significantly higher (P 0.01) mycorrhizal colonization rate, shoot dry weight and total P content in shoot tissues for the red soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation significantly reduced shoot DEHP content in both soils.

Treatment
AM inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot DEHP contente0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
yellow-brown and red soilse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both in the yellow-brown and red soils, AM inoculation significantly (P 0.01) reduced shoot DEHP content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation did not improve DEHP degradation.

Treatment
AM inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
degradation of DEHPe0
Direction
no positive contributione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with AM inoculation no positive contribution to the degradation of DEHP was found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–154 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.