Paper · 2013 · Advances in Horticultural Science

Pre and post-harvest management affects functional quality of peach (Prunus persica L.) cv. Flavorcrest

G.B. Corbino; G. Sánchez; J. González; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of rootstock, fertilization and post-harvest heat treatments on the antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content in fruits of peach cultivar Flavorcrest was studied. 'Flavorcrest' grafted on 'MrS. 2/5' and 'Flordaguard' rootstocks produced fruits with the highest antioxidant capacity while the activity in the fruit skin was around ten times higher than in the flesh. Treatment without fertilization produced the highest antioxidant capacity in fruit flesh while the fruit skin showed no significant differences between treatments. A moderate heat shock (34 and 42°C), evaluated at 24 h post-harvest, improved the antioxidant capacity of fruits but after keep them for 72 h at 20°C, the values were similar to those observed in untreated fruit. Pre-harvest (rootstocks and fertilization) and post-harvest (heat shock) treatments influenced the functional quality of ‘Flavorcrest’ peach cultivar fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavorcrest on MrS. 2/5 produced fruit with the highest antioxidant capacity.

Material
Flavorcreste0
Treatment
'MrS. 2/5'e0
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Flavorcrest' grafted on 'MrS. 2/5' and 'Flordaguard' rootstocks produced fruits with the highest antioxidant capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–298 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavorcrest on Flordaguard produced fruit with the highest antioxidant capacity.

Material
Flavorcreste0
Treatment
'Flordaguard'e0
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Flavorcrest' grafted on 'MrS. 2/5' and 'Flordaguard' rootstocks produced fruits with the highest antioxidant capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–298 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit skin antioxidant activity was about ten times higher than flesh.

Organ / stage
fruit skine0
Outcome
activity in the fruit skine0
Direction
highere0
Value
around ten timese0
Comparator
fleshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activity in the fruit skin was around ten times higher than in the flesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No fertilizer gave the highest flesh antioxidant capacity.

Treatment
without fertilizatione0
Outcome
antioxidant capacity in fruit fleshe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment without fertilization produced the highest antioxidant capacity in fruit flesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Skin antioxidant capacity showed no significant differences between fertilizer treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit skine0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fruit skin showed no significant differences between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 34°C heat shock improved fruit antioxidant capacity at 24 hours.

Treatment
34e0
Outcome
antioxidant capacity of fruitse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
24 h post-harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A moderate heat shock (34 and 42°C), evaluated at 24 h post-harvest, improved the antioxidant capacity of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 42°C heat shock improved fruit antioxidant capacity at 24 hours.

Treatment
42°Ce0
Outcome
antioxidant capacity of fruitse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
24 h post-harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A moderate heat shock (34 and 42°C), evaluated at 24 h post-harvest, improved the antioxidant capacity of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 72 hours at 20°C, heated fruit antioxidant values were similar to untreated fruit.

Treatment
heat shocke2
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye2
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
72 h at 20°Ce0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after keep them for 72 h at 20°C, the values were similar to those observed in untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–758 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved the antioxidant capacity of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–659 · show in text ↑
e2

“A moderate heat shock (34 and 42°C), evaluated at 24 h post-harvest, improved the antioxidant capacity of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.