Paper · 2025 · Crop and Environment

Root plasticity and nutrient uptake in rainfed lowland rice under nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer management

Ryosuke Tajima; Yoichiro Kato; Naoki Moritsuka; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rainfed lowlands account for one-third of the total rice land in tropical Asia. Rice production is often constrained by low nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability under rainfed lowland conditions. Genotypes with root phenotypic plasticity to fertilizer management may be advantageous for nutrient uptake and crop growth in rainfed lowlands. To test our hypothesis, we conducted a two-year field experiment in northeastern Thailand. Three genotypes (two advanced backcross lines and the recipient) with contrasting root morphologies were grown under sufficient and limited N and P fertilizers (four treatments). Without any drought symptoms throughout the experimental period, the average grain yield across years, treatments, and genotypes was 3.58 t ha -1 . sufficient N application significantly increased grain yield, shoot biomass, and N uptake in both years; however, it reduced root length density. In contrast, the effect of sufficient P application was unclear, with a significant increase in P uptake observed only in the second year. At the panicle initiation stage, one advanced backcross line demonstrated a higher root length density in subsoil (10–30 cm) and higher P uptake. The positive correlation between root length density (0–30 cm) and P uptake suggests that greater root proliferation enhances P acquisition in rainfed lowlands. Furthermore, genotypic differences in rhizosphere effects may have contributed to improved P solubilization in the topsoil, and N management may have altered root plasticity. These findings emphasize the importance of root traits in improving N and P use efficiency in rainfed lowlands and offer insights for rice breeding in drought-prone environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean rice grain yield was 3.58 t ha -1 across years, treatments and genotypes.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
3.58 t ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the average grain yield across years, treatments, and genotypes was 3.58 t ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sufficient N increased grain yield, shoot biomass and N uptake.

Treatment
sufficient N applicatione0
Outcome
grain yield, shoot biomass, and N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sufficient N application significantly increased grain yield, shoot biomass, and N uptake in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sufficient N reduced root length density.

Treatment
nitrogent0
Outcome
root length densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however, it reduced root length density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root plasticity and nutrient uptake in rainfed lowland rice under nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sufficient P increased P uptake only in year two.

Treatment
phosphorus fertilizert0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
only in the second yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase in P uptake observed only in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root plasticity and nutrient uptake in rainfed lowland rice under nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One advanced backcross line had higher subsoil root length density.

Material
one advanced backcross linee0
Organ / stage
subsoile0
Outcome
root length densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
10–30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one advanced backcross line demonstrated a higher root length density in subsoil (10–30 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One advanced backcross line had higher P uptake.

Material
one advanced backcross linee0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one advanced backcross line demonstrated a higher root length density in subsoil (10–30 cm) and higher P uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length density correlated positively with P uptake.

Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
0–30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive correlation between root length density (0–30 cm) and P uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic rhizosphere differences may have improved topsoil P solubilization.

Outcome
P solubilizatione0
Qualifier
rhizosphere effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypic differences in rhizosphere effects may have contributed to improved P solubilization in the topsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N management may have altered root plasticity.

Treatment
N managemente0
Outcome
root plasticitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N management may have altered root plasticity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–59 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.