Paper · 2025 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Silicon Drench Application as a Plant Nutrient Tool to Mitigate Heat Stress in Rice Seedlings

Alvaro Daniel Pantoja-Benavides; German Arturo Moreno-Poveda; Cristhian Camilo Chávez-Arias; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Silicon (Si) is a beneficial element that facilitates plant adaptation to abiotic stress conditions, including heat stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of Si through the application of two silicon compounds, namely, potassium silicate (SiK) and calcium silicate (SiCa), at different commercial application rates (1 L ha−1 and 2 L ha−1 for SiK; and 1.5 L ha−1 and 3 L ha−1 for SiCa) to alleviate the effects of elevated day/night temperatures (HT = 40°C/30°C) in two rice genotypes [Fedearroz 67 (tolerant) and Fedearroz 2000 (susceptible)]. Two experiments were conducted. In the first (E1), four treatment groups were established in Fedearroz 67 plants: control (CK = 30°/25°C), HT without silicon, HT with SiK at 2 L ha−1 (drench), and HT with SiCa at 3 L ha−1 (drench). In the second (E2), treatments (CK, HT, HT + SiK at 1 or 2 L ha−1, and HT + SiCa at 1.5 or 3 L ha−1) were applied to Fedearroz 67 and Fedearroz 2000 genotypes. In E1, Si drench increased stomatal conductance (gs: 363.8 mmol m−2 s−1), Fv/Fm ratio (0.69), and chlorophyll content (28.5 SPAD units) compared to HT Fedearroz 67 plants (145.7 mmol m−2 s−1 for gs, 0.46 for Fv/Fm, and 16.8 SPAD units). In E2, SiK had a higher relative tolerance index (RTI) in HT Fedearroz 67, with no differences in HT Fedearroz 2000. In conclusion, SiK or SiCa can mitigate heat stress effects on rice in tropical environments during high temperature periods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon drench increased stomatal conductance in heat-stressed Fedearroz 67 to 363.8 mmol m−2 s−1 versus 145.7.

Material
Fedearroz 67e0
Treatment
Si drenche0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
363.8 mmol m−2 s−1e0
Comparator
HT Fedearroz 67 plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si drench increased stomatal conductance (gs: 363.8 mmol m−2 s−1), Fv/Fm ratio (0.69), and chlorophyll content (28.5 SPAD units) compared to HT Fedearroz 67 plants (145.7 mmol m−2 s−1 for gs, 0.46 for Fv/Fm, and 16.8 SPAD units)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon drench increased Fv/Fm ratio to 0.69 versus 0.46 in heat-stressed Fedearroz 67.

Material
Fedearroz 67e0
Treatment
Si drenche0
Outcome
Fv/Fm ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.69e0
Comparator
HT Fedearroz 67 plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si drench increased stomatal conductance (gs: 363.8 mmol m−2 s−1), Fv/Fm ratio (0.69), and chlorophyll content (28.5 SPAD units) compared to HT Fedearroz 67 plants (145.7 mmol m−2 s−1 for gs, 0.46 for Fv/Fm, and 16.8 SPAD units)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon drench increased chlorophyll content to 28.5 SPAD units versus 16.8 in heat-stressed Fedearroz 67.

Material
Fedearroz 67e0
Treatment
Si drenche0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.5 SPAD unitse0
Comparator
HT Fedearroz 67 plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si drench increased stomatal conductance (gs: 363.8 mmol m−2 s−1), Fv/Fm ratio (0.69), and chlorophyll content (28.5 SPAD units) compared to HT Fedearroz 67 plants (145.7 mmol m−2 s−1 for gs, 0.46 for Fv/Fm, and 16.8 SPAD units)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiK had higher relative tolerance index in heat-stressed Fedearroz 67.

Material
Fedearroz 67e0
Treatment
SiKe0
Outcome
relative tolerance indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiK had a higher relative tolerance index (RTI) in HT Fedearroz 67”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No RTI difference was observed for heat-stressed Fedearroz 2000.

Material
Fedearroz 2000e0
Treatment
SiKe1
Outcome
relative tolerance indexe1
Direction
no differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no differences in HT Fedearroz 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1304 · show in text ↑
e1

“SiK had a higher relative tolerance index (RTI) in HT Fedearroz 67”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–93 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: gas exchange · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

42 papers: 38 positive, 4 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 46 positive, 1 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 49 positive, 3 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

application · physiology: gas exchange · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.