Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Influence of sole and consortia application of micronutrients for biofortification of zinc, iron and boron for improving maize productivity

Khadim Dawar; Muhammad Wasif Shah; Modhi O. Alotaibi; et al.

10
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Maize crop is a vital source of nutrients, but its productivity and nutritional quality are threatened by climate change-induced stresses. Among different micronutrients, zinc (Zn) has prime importance due to its role in improving growth, enzyme activation, protein synthesis, and chlorophyll production. On the other hand, iron (Fe) is essential for electron transport, respiration, energy production, and metabolic functions. Furthermore, the role of boron (B) in cell wall formation, membrane integrity, pollen germination, seed and fruit development is also vital. Previous studies have largely focused on individual micronutrient management, overlooking their synergistic roles. However, synergistic contribution of zinc, iron, and boron toward maize biofortification and yield improvement still needs investigation. This study uniquely addresses this gap by evaluating sole and consortia applications of these micronutrients to enhance yield and micronutrients (Zn, Fe, and B) in maize. A total of eight treatments, i.e., control, Fe, Zn, B, Fe + Zn, Fe + B, Zn + B, and Fe + Zn + B, were applied in soil while bed preparation for sowing of maize (Azam variety) in three replications, following a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Results demonstrate that Fe + Zn + B caused an increase in maize plant height (33.12%), 1000-grain weight (37.05%), biological yield (21.23%), grain yield (47.35%) while decrease in POD (38.77%), SOD (48.37%), CAT (48.78%), and APx (50.00%) compared to the control. Furthermore, improvement in Fe, Zn, and B concentration in leaves and grains verified the efficacious functioning of Fe + Zn + B more than the control. In conclusion, Fe + Zn + B is suggested as an effective amendment for mitigating nutritional deficiency in maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe + Zn + B increased maize plant height by 33.12% compared to the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Fe + Zn + Be1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
increasee1
Value
33.12%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results demonstrate that Fe + Zn + B caused an increase in maize plant height (33.12%), 1000-grain weight (37.05%), biological yield (21.23%), grain yield (47.35%) while decrease in POD (38.77%), SOD (48.37%), CAT (48.78%), and APx (50.00%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe + Zn + B increased maize 1000-grain weight by 37.05% compared to the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Fe + Zn + Be1
Outcome
1000-grain weighte1
Direction
increasee1
Value
37.05%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results demonstrate that Fe + Zn + B caused an increase in maize plant height (33.12%), 1000-grain weight (37.05%), biological yield (21.23%), grain yield (47.35%) while decrease in POD (38.77%), SOD (48.37%), CAT (48.78%), and APx (50.00%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe + Zn + B increased maize biological yield by 21.23% compared to the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Fe + Zn + Be1
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
21.23%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results demonstrate that Fe + Zn + B caused an increase in maize plant height (33.12%), 1000-grain weight (37.05%), biological yield (21.23%), grain yield (47.35%) while decrease in POD (38.77%), SOD (48.37%), CAT (48.78%), and APx (50.00%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe + Zn + B increased maize grain yield by 47.35% compared to the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Fe + Zn + Be1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
47.35%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results demonstrate that Fe + Zn + B caused an increase in maize plant height (33.12%), 1000-grain weight (37.05%), biological yield (21.23%), grain yield (47.35%) while decrease in POD (38.77%), SOD (48.37%), CAT (48.78%), and APx (50.00%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe + Zn + B decreased POD activity by 38.77% compared to the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Fe + Zn + Be1
Outcome
PODe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
38.77%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results demonstrate that Fe + Zn + B caused an increase in maize plant height (33.12%), 1000-grain weight (37.05%), biological yield (21.23%), grain yield (47.35%) while decrease in POD (38.77%), SOD (48.37%), CAT (48.78%), and APx (50.00%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe + Zn + B decreased SOD activity by 48.37% compared to the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Fe + Zn + Be1
Outcome
SODe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
48.37%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results demonstrate that Fe + Zn + B caused an increase in maize plant height (33.12%), 1000-grain weight (37.05%), biological yield (21.23%), grain yield (47.35%) while decrease in POD (38.77%), SOD (48.37%), CAT (48.78%), and APx (50.00%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe + Zn + B decreased CAT activity by 48.78% compared to the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Fe + Zn + Be1
Outcome
CATe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
48.78%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results demonstrate that Fe + Zn + B caused an increase in maize plant height (33.12%), 1000-grain weight (37.05%), biological yield (21.23%), grain yield (47.35%) while decrease in POD (38.77%), SOD (48.37%), CAT (48.78%), and APx (50.00%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe + Zn + B decreased APx activity by 50.00% compared to the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Fe + Zn + Be1
Outcome
APxe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
50.00%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results demonstrate that Fe + Zn + B caused an increase in maize plant height (33.12%), 1000-grain weight (37.05%), biological yield (21.23%), grain yield (47.35%) while decrease in POD (38.77%), SOD (48.37%), CAT (48.78%), and APx (50.00%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe + Zn + B improved Fe, Zn and B concentration in leaves and grains more than the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
leaves and grainse2
Treatment
Fe + Zn + Be2
Outcome
Fe, Zn, and B concentratione2
Direction
improvemente2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Furthermore, improvement in Fe, Zn, and B concentration in leaves and grains verified the efficacious functioning of Fe + Zn + B more than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results demonstrate that Fe + Zn + B caused an increase in maize plant height (33.12%), 1000-grain weight (37.05%), biological yield (21.23%), grain yield (47.35%) while decrease in POD (38.77%), SOD (48.37%), CAT (48.78%), and APx (50.00%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1508 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fe + Zn + B is suggested as an effective amendment for mitigating nutritional deficiency in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Outcome
mitigating nutritional deficiencye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“In conclusion, Fe + Zn + B is suggested as an effective amendment for mitigating nutritional deficiency in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1774 · show in text ↑

iron atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

64 papers: 57 positive, 7 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

iron atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

73 papers: 62 positive, 11 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

224 papers: 183 positive, 41 negative or no effect

182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

220 papers more in this group

See all 224 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 49 positive, 5 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.