Paper · 2025 · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology

Antioxidative potential of plum oil cake‐based coatings for fresh‐cut apple preservation

Jovana Pantić; Sunčica Kocić‐Tanackov; Anita Milić; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND To add value to a food waste, plum oil cake (POC) was used to develop biopolymer coatings enriched with Satureja montana essential oil for preserving fresh‐cut apples. The effectiveness of the active POC coating (C) was compared with an ascorbic acid treatment (ASC) and a combined treatment of POC coating and ASC (C‐ASC). RESULTS The efficacy of the treatments was evaluated on uncoated and coated fresh‐cut apples stored at 4 °C for 14 days. Compared to ASC, POC coating – both alone and combined with ASC – showed consistently better results, especially in the inhibition of lactic acid bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae , aerobic mesophilic bacteria and molds. While ASC was most effective in preserving total flavonoids (197.60–73.97 mg 100 g −1 dry matter, from the first to the last storage day), the C‐ASC treatment maintained the highest and most stable antioxidant activity throughout the storage (0.90–0.95 mg Trolox g −1 dry matter), showing a synergistic effect of POC coating and ASC in the preservation of antioxidant compounds. Additionally, the C‐ASC treatment showed the lowest browning index (39.42) at the end of storage. The texture, sugar content, titratable acidity and total phenolic content were also better preserved with C‐ASC than with POC coating. CONCLUSION These results show a double benefit: food waste valorization through synthesis of POC coatings and the enhanced preservation of fresh‐cut apples with natural preservatives that outperform conventional ASC treatment. Even as stand‐alone treatment, POC coating extends the shelf life of fresh‐cut apples, while the combination with ASC enhances this effect through its synergistic action. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POC coating alone inhibited spoilage microbes more than ASC.

Treatment
POC coatinge0
Outcome
inhibition of lactic acid bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae , aerobic mesophilic bacteriae0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
ASCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to ASC, POC coating – both alone and combined with ASC – showed consistently better results, especially in the inhibition of lactic acid bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae , aerobic mesophilic bacteria and molds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POC coating with ASC inhibited spoilage microbes more than ASC.

Treatment
combined with ASCe0
Outcome
moldse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
ASCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to ASC, POC coating – both alone and combined with ASC – showed consistently better results, especially in the inhibition of lactic acid bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae , aerobic mesophilic bacteria and molds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASC best preserved total flavonoids across storage.

Treatment
ASCe0
Outcome
total flavonoidse0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
197.60–73.97 mg 100 g −1 dry mattere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ASC was most effective in preserving total flavonoids (197.60–73.97 mg 100 g −1 dry matter, from the first to the last storage day)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C‐ASC maintained the highest stable antioxidant activity during storage.

Treatment
C‐ASC treatmente0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.90–0.95 mg Trolox g −1 dry mattere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C‐ASC treatment maintained the highest and most stable antioxidant activity throughout the storage (0.90–0.95 mg Trolox g −1 dry matter)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C‐ASC had the lowest browning index, 39.42, at storage end.

Treatment
C‐ASC treatmente0
Outcome
browning indexe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
39.42e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C‐ASC treatment showed the lowest browning index (39.42) at the end of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C‐ASC better preserved texture, sugar content and titratable acidity than POC coating.

Treatment
C‐ASCe0
Outcome
texture, sugar content, titratable aciditye0
Direction
better preservede0
Comparator
POC coatinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The texture, sugar content, titratable acidity and total phenolic content were also better preserved with C‐ASC than with POC coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C‐ASC better preserved total phenolic content than POC coating.

Treatment
C‐ASCe0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
better preservede0
Comparator
POC coatinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The texture, sugar content, titratable acidity and total phenolic content were also better preserved with C‐ASC than with POC coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POC coating alone extended fresh-cut apple shelf life.

Treatment
POC coatinge0
Outcome
shelf life of fresh‐cut applese0
Direction
extendse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even as stand‐alone treatment, POC coating extends the shelf life of fresh‐cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining POC coating with ASC further enhanced shelf-life extension.

Treatment
combination with ASCe0
Outcome
this effecte0
Direction
enhancese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the combination with ASC enhances this effect through its synergistic action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1689 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑

ascorbic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

botanical · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

storage · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 47 positive, 17 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

118 papers: 93 positive, 25 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.