Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

A synergistic biochar‑mycorrhizal strategy enhances rapeseed phytoremediation and antioxidant defences under Cd and Cr stress

Sibel Boysan Canal

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) and chromium (Cr) pollution severely limit the productivity of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). A synergistic strategy combining biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), applied with or without humic acid, was evaluated in greenhouse soil spiked with 50 mg kg⁻¹ Cd and Cr. AMF inoculation increased shoot dry weight by 36% and the Cd bioconcentration factor by 11% relative to polluted controls. Adding biochar or humic acid further elevated shoot- and root-BCF for Cd and Cr by 25-80% and raised the transfer factor above 1.2, indicating efficient root-to-shoot metal translocation. Total accumulation concentration doubled compared with AMF alone. The humic-acid + AMF treatment reduced malondialdehyde by 36% and moderated superoxide dismutase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase activities, evidencing lower oxidative stress. Overall, integrating AMF with biochar or humic acid enhanced biomass, mitigated oxidative damage, and strengthened phytoremediation capacity, offering a practical solution for Cd/Cr-contaminated, low-organic-matter soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased shoot dry weight by 36% relative to polluted controls.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
polluted controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation increased shoot dry weight by 36% and the Cd bioconcentration factor by 11% relative to polluted controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased the Cd bioconcentration factor by 11% relative to polluted controls.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Cd bioconcentration factore0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
polluted controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation increased shoot dry weight by 36% and the Cd bioconcentration factor by 11% relative to polluted controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biochar or humic acid elevated shoot and root Cd and Cr bioconcentration factors by 25-80%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
biochar or humic acide0
Outcome
shoot- and root-BCF for Cd and Cre0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
25-80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Adding biochar or humic acid further elevated shoot- and root-BCF for Cd and Cr by 25-80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biochar or humic acid raised the transfer factor above 1.2.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
biochar or humic acide0
Outcome
transfer factore0
Direction
raisede0
Value
above 1.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Adding biochar or humic acid further elevated shoot- and root-BCF for Cd and Cr by 25-80% and raised the transfer factor above 1.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total accumulation concentration doubled compared with AMF alone.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Outcome
Total accumulation concentratione0
Direction
doublede0
Comparator
AMF alonee0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“Total accumulation concentration doubled compared with AMF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid plus AMF reduced malondialdehyde by 36%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
humic-acid + AMF treatmente0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
malondialdehydee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The humic-acid + AMF treatment reduced malondialdehyde by 36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid plus AMF moderated superoxide dismutase, catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
humic-acid + AMF treatmente0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
superoxide dismutase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase activitiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The humic-acid + AMF treatment reduced malondialdehyde by 36% and moderated superoxide dismutase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · physiology: oxidative · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.