Paper · 2025 · Plant Growth Regulation

Co-application of salicylic acid and potassium induce salinity tolerance by modulating ion homeostasis, chlorophyll pigments and photosynthetic apparatus in wheat

Farzana Shaheen; Muhammad Yasin Ashraf; Muhammad Iftikhar Hussain; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Salinity is a major abiotic stress limiting global agricultural productivity, particularly affecting the physiological functions, nutrient uptake, and gas exchange processes of crops like wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). As salinization of arable land continues to expand, identifying effective and sustainable mitigation strategies is critical. This study evaluated the impact of foliar-applied salicylic acid (SA) (0, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.03%) and potassium (K) (0, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.15%) at two key growth stages (vegetative and grain filling) on two wheat varieties (WL-711 and Kohistan-97) grown under saline (120 mM NaCl; ≈12 dS/m) and non-saline conditions in a controlled pot experiment. Results showed that foliar application of SA (0.02%) and K (0.1%) significantly improved leaf nutrient concentrations (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) and enhanced photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids) under salt stress. These treatments also alleviated the adverse effects of salinity on gas exchange parameters, with WL-711 displaying higher tolerance than Kohistan-97. Overall, exogenous application of SA and K effectively improved physiological resilience and nutrient homeostasis in salt-stressed wheat. Notably, this study demonstrates, for the first time, the synergistic effect of optimal foliar doses of SA and K at two critical developmental stages, offering a practical and low-cost strategy to mitigate salinity stress in wheat. The findings provides a valuable basis for future field-scale interventions to enhance wheat productivity in salt-affected regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SA at 0.02% and K at 0.1% significantly improved wheat leaf nutrient concentrations under salt stress.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
foliar application of SA (0.02%) and K (0.1%)e0
Outcome
leaf nutrient concentrations (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of SA (0.02%) and K (0.1%) significantly improved leaf nutrient concentrations (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) and enhanced photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids) under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same foliar applications enhanced wheat photosynthetic pigments under salt stress.

Treatment
foliar application of SA (0.02%) and K (0.1%)e0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of SA (0.02%) and K (0.1%) significantly improved leaf nutrient concentrations (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) and enhanced photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids) under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments alleviated salinity effects on wheat gas exchange.

Treatment
These treatmentse0
Outcome
gas exchange parameterse0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments also alleviated the adverse effects of salinity on gas exchange parameters, with WL-711 displaying higher tolerance than Kohistan-97”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WL-711 displayed higher salt tolerance than Kohistan-97.

Material
WL-711e0
Outcome
tolerancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Kohistan-97e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with WL-711 displaying higher tolerance than Kohistan-97”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–162 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

salicylic acid · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 70 positive, 2 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.