Paper · 2026 · Plant Stress

Decoding the genomic landscape of class III peroxidase family in Saccharum officinarum and the immune role of ScPOD01

Yachun Su; Zhuqing Wang; Yurong Luo; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

• Sugarcane POD activity increased broadly during Sporisorium scitamineum infection. • A total of 174 POD genes were identified in the Saccharum officinarum genome. • Structural diversity and evolutionary mechanisms of PODs were elucidated. • The expression of POD genes is tissue-specific and stress-responsive. • ScPOD01 , a S. scitamineum -induced POD , activated plant immunity via HR/SA pathways. Class III peroxidases (PODs) are crucial for plant growth and stress responses, yet few have been characterized in sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.). In this study, elevated POD activity was detected across eight sugarcane genotypes during their interaction with Sporisorium scitamineum , suggesting a role in smut defense. To further explore this gene family, 174 SoPOD genes, classified into seven subgroups, were identified in S. officinarum LA-purple. Family expansion primarily was assumed to result from whole-genome/segmental duplications (83.90%), with Ka/Ks < 1 in 94.74% of gene pairs. SoPOD promoters were enriched in stress- and hormone-related cis -regulatory elements. Transcriptome data revealed that SoPOD expression was tissue-specific and responsive to cold, drought, and S. scitamineum infection. Notably, SoPOD30 was exclusively upregulated in the resistant cultivar after infection but undetectable in the susceptible one. Its homolog ScPOD01 was subsequently isolated from sugarcane hybrid cultivars and shown to possess a canonical four-exon/three-intron gene structure and plasma membrane localization. Real-time quantitative PCR demonstrated ScPOD01 induction by S. scitamineum infection across all eight cultivars and under various abiotic stresses (abscisic acid, methyl jasmonate, hydrogen peroxide, polyethylene glycol, and sodium chloride). Interestingly, the transient expression of ScPOD01 in Nicotiana benthamiana activated immune responses, as evidenced by intensified DAB staining and upregulation of hypersensitive reaction- and SA-related genes, however its prokaryotic expression did not enhance bacterial stress tolerance. These findings uncover the evolutionary diversification and expression specificity of the sugarcane POD family and elucidate the immune function of ScPOD01 , laying a foundation for understanding POD roles in sugarcane disease resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane POD activity was elevated across eight genotypes during infection with Sporisorium scitamineum.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
eight sugarcane genotypese1
Interactor
Sporisorium scitamineumSporisorium scitamineume1pathogen
Outcome
POD activitye1
Direction
elevatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporisorium scitamineum
Sporisorium scitamineum · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“elevated POD activity was detected across eight sugarcane genotypes during their interaction with Sporisorium scitamineum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–682 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A total of 174 POD genes were identified in the Saccharum officinarum genome.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarumSaccharum officinarume2
Outcome
POD genese2
Value
174e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“A total of 174 POD genes were identified in the Saccharum officinarum genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–163 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Family expansion was assumed to result mainly from whole-genome/segmental duplications, accounting for 83.90%.

Taxon
S. officinarumSaccharum officinarume4
Outcome
Family expansione3
Value
83.90%e3
Qualifier
whole-genome/segmental duplicationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Family expansion primarily was assumed to result from whole-genome/segmental duplications (83.90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–950 · show in text ↑
e4

“174 SoPOD genes, classified into seven subgroups, were identified in S. officinarum LA-purple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–850 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ka/Ks was below 1 in 94.74% of SoPOD gene pairs.

Taxon
S. officinarumSaccharum officinarume4
Outcome
gene pairse5
Value
94.74%e5
Qualifier
Ka/Ks < 1e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“174 SoPOD genes, classified into seven subgroups, were identified in S. officinarum LA-purple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–850 · show in text ↑
e5

“with Ka/Ks < 1 in 94.74% of gene pairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–990 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SoPOD promoters were enriched in stress- and hormone-related cis-regulatory elements.

Taxon
S. officinarumSaccharum officinarume4
Gene
SoPODe6
Outcome
cis -regulatory elementse6
Direction
enrichede6
Qualifier
stress- and hormone-relatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“SoPOD promoters were enriched in stress- and hormone-related cis -regulatory elements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1077 · show in text ↑
e4

“174 SoPOD genes, classified into seven subgroups, were identified in S. officinarum LA-purple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–850 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SoPOD expression is tissue-specific and responsive to cold, drought, and S. scitamineum infection.

Taxon
S. officinarumSaccharum officinarume4
Treatment
cold, drought, and S. scitamineum infectione7
Interactor
S. scitamineumSporisorium scitamineume7pathogen
Outcome
SoPOD expressione7
Qualifier
tissue-specifice7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sporisorium scitamineum
Sporisorium scitamineum · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Transcriptome data revealed that SoPOD expression was tissue-specific and responsive to cold, drought, and S. scitamineum infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1210 · show in text ↑
e4

“174 SoPOD genes, classified into seven subgroups, were identified in S. officinarum LA-purple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–850 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SoPOD30 was upregulated only in the resistant cultivar after infection and was undetectable in the susceptible one.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
resistant cultivare2
Gene
SoPOD30e2
Outcome
SoPOD30e2
Direction
exclusively upregulatede2
Comparator
susceptible onee2

Verbatim

e2

“Notably, SoPOD30 was exclusively upregulated in the resistant cultivar after infection but undetectable in the susceptible one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1338 · show in text ↑
e1

“elevated POD activity was detected across eight sugarcane genotypes during their interaction with Sporisorium scitamineum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–682 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ScPOD01 was induced by S. scitamineum infection across all eight cultivars.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
all eight cultivarse0
Interactor
S. scitamineumSporisorium scitamineume0pathogen
Gene
ScPOD01e0
Outcome
ScPOD01 inductione0
Direction
inductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporisorium scitamineum
Sporisorium scitamineum · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Real-time quantitative PCR demonstrated ScPOD01 induction by S. scitamineum infection across all eight cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1635 · show in text ↑
e1

“Its homolog ScPOD01 was subsequently isolated from sugarcane hybrid cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1417 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ScPOD01 was induced under abscisic acid, methyl jasmonate, hydrogen peroxide, polyethylene glycol, and sodium chloride treatments.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
abscisic acid, methyl jasmonate, hydrogen peroxide, polyethylene glycol, and sodium chloridee2
Gene
ScPOD01e0
Outcome
ScPOD01 inductione0
Direction
inductione0

Verbatim

e0

“Real-time quantitative PCR demonstrated ScPOD01 induction by S. scitamineum infection across all eight cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1635 · show in text ↑
e2

“under various abiotic stresses (abscisic acid, methyl jasmonate, hydrogen peroxide, polyethylene glycol, and sodium chloride)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1765 · show in text ↑
e1

“Its homolog ScPOD01 was subsequently isolated from sugarcane hybrid cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1417 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ScPOD01 has a canonical four-exon/three-intron gene structure and is localized to the plasma membrane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Gene
ScPOD01e0
Outcome
gene structure and plasma membrane localizatione2

Verbatim

e0

“Its homolog ScPOD01 was subsequently isolated from sugarcane hybrid cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1417 · show in text ↑
e2

“shown to possess a canonical four-exon/three-intron gene structure and plasma membrane localization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transient expression of ScPOD01 in Nicotiana benthamiana activated immune responses, with intensified DAB staining and upregulated hypersensitive reaction- and SA-related genes.

Taxon
Nicotiana benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae0
Treatment
transient expression of ScPOD01e0
Gene
ScPOD01e0
Outcome
immune responsese0
Direction
activatede0
Qualifier
intensified DAB staining and upregulation of hypersensitive reaction- and SA-related genese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the transient expression of ScPOD01 in Nicotiana benthamiana activated immune responses, as evidenced by intensified DAB staining and upregulation of hypersensitive reaction- and SA-related genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prokaryotic expression of ScPOD01 did not enhance bacterial stress tolerance.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
prokaryotic expressione0
Gene
ScPOD01e1
Outcome
bacterial stress tolerancee0
Direction
did not enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“however its prokaryotic expression did not enhance bacterial stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1979–2056 · show in text ↑
e1

“Its homolog ScPOD01 was subsequently isolated from sugarcane hybrid cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1417 · show in text ↑

transgenic · disease · Nicotiana benthamianaPositive and negative results

53 papers: 26 positive, 27 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.