Abstract
In the face of climate change, optimizing root systems to enhance subsoil water and nutrient extraction is increasingly vital for resilient and efficient crop production. Subsoil amelioration approaches such as deep tillage, compost application in the upper subsoil, crop rotations could play an important role to enhance deeper root growth, resource acquisition from subsoil and creation of biopores. Intercropping of cereals and legumes provides a suitable approach to study root growth dynamics in subsoil and utilization of biopores. These approaches advance understanding of how integrated biological and technical subsoil amelioration strategies can optimize root growth, improve subsoil function, and ultimately increase crop productivity. This thesis presents three complementary field studies in Germany focused on subsoil resource exploitation in cereals and legumes. (i) The first study evaluated the combined effects of deep-rooted lucerne as a pre-crop and strip-wise deep tillage with compost on subsequent spring barley and winter wheat. (ii) The second study investigated genotype-dependent responses of spring barley and winter wheat to deep tillage and compost. (iii) The third study quantified root length density and biopore usage in spring wheat and faba bean grown in pure stands and mixtures. Findings demonstrated that (1) the lucerne together with deep tillage and compost increased subsoil root length density, rooting depth, nutrient uptake, and yield in spring barley under dry conditions, with limited benefits observed for winter wheat when water was abundant. (2) Deep soil tillage in combination with compost generally promoted root growth and nutrient uptake across genotypes, but yield responses varied, highlighting the importance of root traits in exploiting improved subsoil conditions. Environmental fluctuations across years were one of the key factors in determining the genotype-specific root responses to tillage + compost treatments. (3) The results of the third study showed that intercropping slightly improved overall root performance in the top soil as well as yield performance, affirming the potential productivity advantages of mixtures. Further, faba bean had a higher share of roots in biopores than wheat, especially in deeper soil layers. Collectively, these studies show that both biological (intercropping, pre-crops) and technical (deep tillage, compost) strategies can improve root exploration of the subsoil, crop resilience, and productivity especially under drought while revealing limited effects of genotype but more pronounced crop species interactions on the outcomes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Lucerne pre-cropping with deep tillage and compost increased spring barley subsoil root density and rooting depth under dry conditions.
- Taxon
- spring barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- the lucerne together with deep tillage and composte0
- Outcome
- subsoil root length density, rooting depthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- under dry conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the lucerne together with deep tillage and compost increased subsoil root length density, rooting depth, nutrient uptake, and yield in spring barley under dry conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Lucerne pre-cropping with deep tillage and compost increased spring barley nutrient uptake under dry conditions.
- Taxon
- spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- the lucerne together with deep tillage and composte0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- under dry conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lucerne together with deep tillage and compost increased subsoil root length density, rooting depth, nutrient uptake, and yield in spring barley under dry conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Lucerne pre-cropping with deep tillage and compost increased spring barley yield under dry conditions.
- Taxon
- spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- the lucerne together with deep tillage and composte0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- under dry conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lucerne together with deep tillage and compost increased subsoil root length density, rooting depth, nutrient uptake, and yield in spring barley under dry conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping slightly improved root performance in topsoil.
- Taxon
- spring wheat and faba bean
Vicia faba
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- overall root performance in the top soile0
- Direction
- slightly improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intercropping slightly improved overall root performance in the top soil as well as yield performance”
t0“spring wheat and faba bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping slightly improved yield performance.
- Taxon
- spring wheat and faba beanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- yield performancee0
- Direction
- slightly improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intercropping slightly improved overall root performance in the top soil as well as yield performance”
t0“spring wheat and faba bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Faba bean had a higher share of roots in biopores than wheat, especially in deeper soil.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Outcome
- share of roots in bioporese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- especially in deeper soil layerse0
- Comparator
- wheate0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“faba bean had a higher share of roots in biopores than wheat, especially in deeper soil layers”
The same questions in other papers
Medicago sativa · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
Medicago sativa · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Medicago sativa · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
185 papers more in this group
See all 189 papers →tillage · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →tillage · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →intercropping · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.