Paper · 2026 · BMC Plant Biology

Priority impacts of plant growth promoting fungi and proline under NaCl stress: boosting chickpea plants tolerance and performance

Rabab A. Metwally; Maha A. Azb; Marwa M. El-Demerdash; et al.

20
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Soil salinity threatens global agriculture by impairing plant growth, crop productivity, and soil health. This study was conducted to assess the impact of salinity on chickpea performance at the vegetative stage and the possible ameliorating role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and proline applications. A greenhouse experiment with 30 pots (5 replicates × 6 treatments) subjected half the treatments to 200 mM NaCl, AMF was applied at sowing, and proline was sprayed two weeks post-planting. Total pigments dramatically decreased [49.18%] in salt-stressed chickpea. Biomass, protein and carbohydrate metabolism were also affected. For instance, plant height and total fresh weight (TFW) showed inhibitions of 37.83% and 72.19% as compared to control. Conversely, chickpea under salt stress had an increased accumulation of H 2 O 2 (13.12 mg/g DW) and higher electrolyte leakage (54.72%), however, proline or AMF supplementation decreased their levels. Also, the total protein content and antioxidant enzymes were higher in salt-stressed treatments. Under stress, the total carbohydrate contents in chickpea leaves were significantly enhanced by AMF inoculation (23.44%) and proline application (19.43%), when compared to the control. Moreover, salinity led to distortion of chickpea leaf anatomy including a decrease in upper and lower epidermis thickness, vessel numbers, as well as degradation of palisade and spongy parenchyma. Salinity also disrupted ion balance, increasing Na + and decreasing K + (lower K + /Na + ratio), which elevated H 2 O 2 levels and membrane leakage. These results revealed that AMF as a symbiotic microorganism and proline as a well-known osmoprotectant perform several tasks to alleviate NaCl stress by decreasing Na + uptake, H 2 O 2 content and membrane leakage. Subsequently, an enhancement in growth criteria, pigment fraction and carbohydrates was achieved with their applications under NaCl stress. Most obviously their applications maintained the chickpea leaf anatomy. As an innovative approach, we propose that AMF inoculation or proline application can reverse salinity-induced damage, offering a pathway to enhance crop tolerance in salt-affected regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl stress reduced chickpea total pigments by 49.18%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
salt-stressede0
Outcome
Total pigmentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
49.18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total pigments dramatically decreased [49.18%] in salt-stressed chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress inhibited chickpea height by 37.83% versus control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NaCl stresse1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
inhibitionse0
Value
37.83%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height and total fresh weight (TFW) showed inhibitions of 37.83% and 72.19% as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–766 · show in text ↑
e1

“under NaCl stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–1951 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress inhibited chickpea total fresh weight by 72.19% versus control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NaCl stresse1
Outcome
total fresh weight (TFW)e0
Direction
inhibitionse0
Value
72.19%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height and total fresh weight (TFW) showed inhibitions of 37.83% and 72.19% as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–766 · show in text ↑
e1

“under NaCl stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–1951 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-stressed chickpea accumulated more H 2 O 2, reaching 13.12 mg/g DW.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
accumulation of H 2 O 2e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.12 mg/g DWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea under salt stress had an increased accumulation of H 2 O 2 (13.12 mg/g DW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-stressed chickpea had higher electrolyte leakage of 54.72%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
highere0
Value
54.72%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea under salt stress had an increased accumulation of H 2 O 2 (13.12 mg/g DW) and higher electrolyte leakage (54.72%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline supplementation decreased salt-stress H 2 O 2 and electrolyte leakage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
prolinee0
Outcome
H 2 O 2e1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however, proline or AMF supplementation decreased their levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–967 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased accumulation of H 2 O 2 (13.12 mg/g DW) and higher electrolyte leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF supplementation decreased salt-stress H 2 O 2 and electrolyte leakage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMF supplementatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
H 2 O 2e1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however, proline or AMF supplementation decreased their levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–967 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased accumulation of H 2 O 2 (13.12 mg/g DW) and higher electrolyte leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total protein content was higher in salt-stressed treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salt-stressed treatmentse0
Outcome
total protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total protein content and antioxidant enzymes were higher in salt-stressed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzymes were higher in salt-stressed treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salt-stressed treatmentse0
Outcome
antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total protein content and antioxidant enzymes were higher in salt-stressed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased leaf carbohydrates under stress by 23.44% compared with control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
total carbohydrate contentse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
23.44%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stress, the total carbohydrate contents in chickpea leaves were significantly enhanced by AMF inoculation (23.44%) and proline application (19.43%), when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased leaf carbohydrates under stress by 19.43% compared with control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
proline applicatione0
Outcome
total carbohydrate contentse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
19.43%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stress, the total carbohydrate contents in chickpea leaves were significantly enhanced by AMF inoculation (23.44%) and proline application (19.43%), when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased upper and lower epidermal thickness.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
upper and lower epidermis thicknesse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity led to distortion of chickpea leaf anatomy including a decrease in upper and lower epidermis thickness, vessel numbers, as well as degradation of palisade and spongy parenchyma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced leaf vessel numbers.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
vessel numberse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity led to distortion of chickpea leaf anatomy including a decrease in upper and lower epidermis thickness, vessel numbers, as well as degradation of palisade and spongy parenchyma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity degraded palisade and spongy parenchyma.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
palisade and spongy parenchymae0
Direction
degradatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity led to distortion of chickpea leaf anatomy including a decrease in upper and lower epidermis thickness, vessel numbers, as well as degradation of palisade and spongy parenchyma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased chickpea Na +.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
Na +e0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity also disrupted ion balance, increasing Na + and decreasing K + (lower K + /Na + ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased chickpea K +.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
K +e0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity also disrupted ion balance, increasing Na + and decreasing K + (lower K + /Na + ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity lowered the K + /Na + ratio.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
K + /Na + ratioe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity also disrupted ion balance, increasing Na + and decreasing K + (lower K + /Na + ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF reduced Na + uptake, H 2 O 2 content and membrane leakage under salt stress.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Na + uptake, H 2 O 2 content and membrane leakagee0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF as a symbiotic microorganism and proline as a well-known osmoprotectant perform several tasks to alleviate NaCl stress by decreasing Na + uptake, H 2 O 2 content and membrane leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline reduced Na + uptake, H 2 O 2 content and membrane leakage under salt stress.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
prolinee0
Outcome
Na + uptake, H 2 O 2 content and membrane leakagee0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF as a symbiotic microorganism and proline as a well-known osmoprotectant perform several tasks to alleviate NaCl stress by decreasing Na + uptake, H 2 O 2 content and membrane leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose AMF inoculation or proline to reverse salt damage and improve crop tolerance.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculation or proline applicatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
reverse salinity-induced damagee0
Setting
salt-affected regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we propose that AMF inoculation or proline application can reverse salinity-induced damage, offering a pathway to enhance crop tolerance in salt-affected regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2052–2213 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

29 papers: 7 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

16 papers: 0 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

salinity · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

66 papers: 6 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: oxidative · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.