Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Salt stress inhibited chickpea height by 37.83% versus control.

A claim from Priority impacts of plant growth promoting fungi and proline under NaCl stress: boosting chickpea plants tolerance and performance · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress inhibited chickpea height by 37.83% versus control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NaCl stresse1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
inhibitionse0
Value
37.83%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height and total fresh weight (TFW) showed inhibitions of 37.83% and 72.19% as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–766
e1

“under NaCl stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–1951
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–104

Title

Priority impacts of plant growth promoting fungi and proline under NaCl stress: boosting chickpea plants tolerance and performance

Rabab A. Metwally; Maha A. Azb; Marwa M. El-Demerdash; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2026. doi:10.1186/s12870-026-08096-7

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-fe772c12e2e26d25ed25fe375df4b54e5a242954c561be773e2b2a6e132e589f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

sodium chloride · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

29 papers: 7 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

salinity · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

66 papers: 6 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.