Paper · 2026 · Biological Control

Sustainable control of Phytophthora capsici in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) using garden waste compost tea enriched with Streptomyces AC-3

M.Belén Suárez-Fernández; Mario González-García; Ana I. González-Hernández; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

• A 1:3.5 compost tea formulation increased nutrients, humic compounds, and microbial abundance. • Compost tea showed a stable core microbiome dominated by plant-beneficial taxa. • A native Streptomyces (AC-3) isolated from compost tea showed strong inhibition of Phytophthora spp. • Compost tea enhanced root growth and its combination with Streptomyces AC-3 achieved the highest disease suppression. The search for sustainable alternatives to chemical pesticides remains a key priority in crop protection. This study evaluates the suppressive potential of a compost tea (CT) derived from pruning and garden residues, together with a native Streptomyces isolate (AC-3) with strong in vitro antagonism against Phytophthora spp. Two CT formulations with compost-to-water ratios of 1:5 and 1:3.5 (v/v) were evaluated to assess whether a more concentrated formulation could maintain chemical and microbiological quality while facilitating product handling and commercialization, and whether its application, alone or in combination with Streptomyces AC-3, could suppress pathogen growth and reduce disease development in plants. The concentrated CT (1:3.5) exhibited higher electrical conductivity, nutrient content, and microbial abundance without major changes in the overall microbial structure, as confirmed by metagenomic analysis. Dominant bacterial genera included Mesorhizobium, Micromonospora, and Streptomyces , taxa associated with nutrient cycling and biocontrol. Streptomyces AC-3 showed strong inhibition of oomycetes, including P. capsici , while not affecting beneficial fungi such as T. harzianum . Greenhouse assays demonstrated that CT enhanced root biomass and significantly reduced disease incidence in tomato plants, with the combined treatment (CT plus AC-3) achieving the highest protection. These results highlight the potential of CT as both a biostimulant source and a reservoir of beneficial microorganisms. The combination of CT with selected Streptomyces strains represents a promising, eco-friendly strategy for the management of oomycete pathogens within sustainable agricultural systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3.5 compost tea formulation increased nutrients, humic compounds and microbial abundance relative to the 1:5 formulation.

Treatment
A 1:3.5 compost tea formulatione0
Outcome
nutrients, humic compounds, and microbial abundancee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
1:5e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“A 1:3.5 compost tea formulation increased nutrients, humic compounds, and microbial abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two CT formulations with compost-to-water ratios of 1:5 and 1:3.5 (v/v) were evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The concentrated 1:3.5 compost tea had higher electrical conductivity than the 1:5 formulation.

Treatment
The concentrated CT (1:3.5)e0
Outcome
electrical conductivitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
1:5e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The concentrated CT (1:3.5) exhibited higher electrical conductivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1194 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two CT formulations with compost-to-water ratios of 1:5 and 1:3.5 (v/v) were evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–814 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dominant bacterial genera in the compost tea were Mesorhizobium, Micromonospora and Streptomyces.

Outcome
Dominant bacterial generae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dominant bacterial genera included Mesorhizobium, Micromonospora, and Streptomyces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1416 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The overall microbial structure of the concentrated compost tea showed no major change, as confirmed by metagenomics.

Outcome
overall microbial structuree0
Qualifier
without major changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“without major changes in the overall microbial structure, as confirmed by metagenomic analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces AC-3 strongly inhibited oomycetes, including P. capsici.

Treatment
Streptomyces AC-3e0
Interactor
P. capsiciPhytophthora capsicie0pathogen
Second interactor
Streptomyces AC-3e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibition of oomycetese0
Direction
strong inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Streptomyces AC-3 showed strong inhibition of oomycetes, including P. capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces AC-3 did not affect the beneficial fungus T. harzianum.

Treatment
Streptomyces AC-3e0
Interactor
T. harzianume1other
Outcome
beneficial fungie1
Direction
not affectinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Streptomyces AC-3 showed strong inhibition of oomycetes, including P. capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“while not affecting beneficial fungi such as T. harzianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost tea enhanced tomato root biomass in greenhouse assays.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0
Setting
Greenhouse assayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Greenhouse assays demonstrated that CT enhanced root biomass and significantly reduced disease incidence in tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost tea significantly reduced disease incidence in tomato plants in greenhouse assays.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
Greenhouse assayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Greenhouse assays demonstrated that CT enhanced root biomass and significantly reduced disease incidence in tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment of compost tea with Streptomyces AC-3 gave the highest protection.

Treatment
combined treatment (CT plus AC-3)e0
Outcome
protectione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combined treatment (CT plus AC-3) achieving the highest protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1811 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost tea showed a stable core microbiome dominated by plant-beneficial taxa.

Outcome
core microbiomee0
Qualifier
dominated by plant-beneficial taxae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compost tea showed a stable core microbiome dominated by plant-beneficial taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–177 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combining compost tea with selected Streptomyces strains as a strategy for managing oomycete pathogens.

Outcome
management of oomycete pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phytophthora capsici in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“a promising, eco-friendly strategy for the management of oomycete pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2076 · show in text ↑

fertilization · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 94 positive, 17 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.