Paper · 2026 · Plant Stress

Differential roles of EPF-like peptides in stomatal patterning and drought tolerance via GhERECTA1-mediated signaling in cotton

Shichang He; Xian Du; Qing Chen; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

• First functional analysis of antagonistic EPF-like peptides in cotton. • GhEPF2-2 and GhEPFL9-6 show opposite roles via the GhERECTA1 receptor. • Cross-species assays confirm conserved yet divergent stomatal regulation. • GhEPFL9-6 enhances drought tolerance despite increasing stomatal density. • EPF-ERECTA signaling module provides promising targets for cotton breeding. Precise regulation of stomatal development is essential for optimizing water use efficiency and drought adaptation in crops. EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR (EPF) and EPF-LIKE (EPFL) peptides are well-established regulators of stomatal patterning in model species, yet their functional roles in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum ) remain insufficiently characterized. Here, we investigate two cotton homologs, GhEPF2-2 and GhEPFL9-6 , and show that they exert contrasting effects on stomatal development and drought-associated physiological responses. Transcript profiling revealed leaf-preferential expression of both genes and opposite transcriptional responses to dehydration. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GhEPF2-2 increased stomatal density and aggravated oxidative stress, whereas silencing GhEPFL9-6 reduced stomatal density and improved antioxidant status under PEG-induced dehydration. Heterologous expression in Arabidopsis thaliana further supported their divergent roles: GhEPF2-2 overexpression decreased stomatal density and altered antioxidant profiles, whereas GhEPFL9-6 overexpression increased stomatal density but exhibited improved physiological performance in controlled drought assays, likely through secondary changes in shoot architecture and osmotic adjustment rather than stomatal traits alone. Protein–protein interaction assays indicated that both peptides can interact with the receptor-like kinase GhERECTA1, suggesting their involvement in a shared signaling framework. Together, these findings reveal functional divergence of EPF/EPFL peptides in cotton and provide a basis for further evaluation of their roles in drought adaptation using stable genetic systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhEPF2-2 and GhEPFL9-6 are expressed preferentially in leaves.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
expressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transcript profiling revealed leaf-preferential expression of both genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two genes show opposite transcriptional responses to dehydration.

Treatment
dehydratione0
Outcome
transcriptional responsese0
Direction
oppositee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“opposite transcriptional responses to dehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus-induced silencing of GhEPF2-2 increased stomatal density in cotton.

Treatment
Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GhEPF2-2e1
Gene
GhEPF2-2e1
Outcome
stomatal densitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GhEPF2-2 increased stomatal density and aggravated oxidative stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus-induced silencing of GhEPF2-2 aggravated oxidative stress in cotton.

Treatment
Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GhEPF2-2e1
Gene
GhEPF2-2e1
Outcome
oxidative stresse1
Direction
aggravatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GhEPF2-2 increased stomatal density and aggravated oxidative stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing GhEPFL9-6 reduced stomatal density in cotton under PEG-induced dehydration.

Treatment
silencing GhEPFL9-6e2
Gene
GhEPFL9-6e2
Outcome
stomatal densitye2
Direction
reducede2
Qualifier
under PEG-induced dehydratione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“silencing GhEPFL9-6 reduced stomatal density and improved antioxidant status under PEG-induced dehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing GhEPFL9-6 improved antioxidant status in cotton under PEG-induced dehydration.

Treatment
silencing GhEPFL9-6e2
Gene
GhEPFL9-6e2
Outcome
antioxidant statuse2
Direction
improvede2
Qualifier
under PEG-induced dehydratione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“silencing GhEPFL9-6 reduced stomatal density and improved antioxidant status under PEG-induced dehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhEPF2-2 overexpression decreased stomatal density in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae3
Treatment
GhEPF2-2 overexpressione4
Gene
GhEPF2-2e4
Outcome
stomatal densitye4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Heterologous expression in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1317 · show in text ↑
e4

“GhEPF2-2 overexpression decreased stomatal density and altered antioxidant profiles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhEPF2-2 overexpression altered antioxidant profiles in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae3
Treatment
GhEPF2-2 overexpressione4
Gene
GhEPF2-2e4
Outcome
antioxidant profilese4
Direction
alterede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Heterologous expression in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1317 · show in text ↑
e4

“GhEPF2-2 overexpression decreased stomatal density and altered antioxidant profiles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhEPFL9-6 overexpression increased stomatal density in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae3
Treatment
GhEPFL9-6 overexpressione5
Gene
GhEPFL9-6e5
Outcome
stomatal densitye5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Heterologous expression in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1317 · show in text ↑
e5

“GhEPFL9-6 overexpression increased stomatal density but exhibited improved physiological performance in controlled drought assays, likely through secondary changes in shoot architecture and osmotic adjustment rather than stomatal traits alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhEPFL9-6 overexpression improved physiological performance in controlled drought assays in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae3
Treatment
GhEPFL9-6 overexpressione5
Gene
GhEPFL9-6e5
Outcome
physiological performancee5
Direction
improvede5
Qualifier
controlled drought assayse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Heterologous expression in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1317 · show in text ↑
e5

“GhEPFL9-6 overexpression increased stomatal density but exhibited improved physiological performance in controlled drought assays, likely through secondary changes in shoot architecture and osmotic adjustment rather than stomatal traits alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1694 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The improved drought performance of GhEPFL9-6 overexpression plants may arise through secondary changes in shoot architecture and osmotic adjustment rather than stomatal traits alone.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae3
Gene
GhEPFL9-6e5
Outcome
physiological performancee5
Qualifier
secondary changes in shoot architecture and osmotic adjustmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Heterologous expression in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1317 · show in text ↑
e5

“GhEPFL9-6 overexpression increased stomatal density but exhibited improved physiological performance in controlled drought assays, likely through secondary changes in shoot architecture and osmotic adjustment rather than stomatal traits alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both peptides interact with the receptor-like kinase GhERECTA1 in protein-protein interaction assays.

Gene
GhERECTA1e6
Outcome
interacte6
Qualifier
both peptidese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Protein–protein interaction assays indicated that both peptides can interact with the receptor-like kinase GhERECTA1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhEPF2-2 and GhEPFL9-6 may act in a shared GhERECTA1 signaling framework.

Gene
GhERECTA1e6
Outcome
shared signaling frameworke7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Protein–protein interaction assays indicated that both peptides can interact with the receptor-like kinase GhERECTA1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1812 · show in text ↑
e7

“suggesting their involvement in a shared signaling framework”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1874 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑

loss of function · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 4 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

loss of function · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 8 positive, 32 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.