Paper · 2008 · DSpace@Giresun

PSII Photochemistry and Antioxidant Responses of a Chickpea Variety Exposed to Drought

Ekmekçi, Yasemin; Macar, Tu çe Kalefeto lu

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The effect of drought on the chickpea variety ILC 3279 was investigated at the vegetative stage. After 20 days from sowing, the plants subjected to drought stress for 3, 5 and 7 days imposed by withholding water were permitted to recover by rewatering for 2 days after 3, 5 and 7 days of drought. Shoot elongation, leaf production, fresh and dry biomass reduced while MDA and proline accumulation increased with extended duration of stress. The plants stressed for 3 days exhibited a rapid drop in their relative and absolute water contents. The quantum efficiency of PSII open centres in the dark-adapted and light-saturated state, excitation energy trapping of PSII and electron transport rate decreased significantly from the 5th day to the end of the drought treatments. Plants drought-stressed for 7 days brought about a marked increase in non-photochemical energy dissipation and a marked decline in photochemical quenching. After rewatering all chlorophyll a fluorescence characteristics except for FM completely recovered and reached the control values. Under 5 and 7 days of drought, the anthocyanin content increased gradually while the total chlorophyll content of leaves declined compared to the controls. The total carotenoid content remained unchanged during the experiments. The antioxidant enzyme response to drought treatments was quite variable. The total SOD activity upregulated with increasing duration of stress. On the other hand, the total APX activity was significantly higher only on the 7th day while the total POD activity increased from the 5th day. Differences in the total GR activity of treated groups were not statistically significant compared to their controls throughout the treatments. The present results indicate that the chickpea variety ILC 3279 withstands severe drought with its upregulated protective mechanisms at the vegetative stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer drought reduced chickpea shoot elongation, leaf production, and fresh and dry biomass.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
extended duration of stresse0
Outcome
Shoot elongation, leaf production, fresh and dry biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot elongation, leaf production, fresh and dry biomass reduced while MDA and proline accumulation increased with extended duration of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer drought increased MDA and proline accumulation in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
extended duration of stresse0
Outcome
MDA and proline accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA and proline accumulation increased with extended duration of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three days of drought rapidly reduced chickpea relative and absolute water content.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
stressed for 3 dayse0
Outcome
relative and absolute water contentse0
Direction
rapid drope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants stressed for 3 days exhibited a rapid drop in their relative and absolute water contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

From day five of drought, chickpea PSII quantum efficiency, energy trapping, and electron transport rate decreased significantly.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
drought treatmentse0
Outcome
quantum efficiency of PSII open centres in the dark-adapted and light-saturated state, excitation energy trapping of PSII and electron transport ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
from the 5th day to the ende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quantum efficiency of PSII open centres in the dark-adapted and light-saturated state, excitation energy trapping of PSII and electron transport rate decreased significantly from the 5th day to the end of the drought treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven days of drought markedly increased chickpea non-photochemical energy dissipation.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
drought-stressed for 7 dayse0
Outcome
non-photochemical energy dissipatione0
Direction
marked increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants drought-stressed for 7 days brought about a marked increase in non-photochemical energy dissipation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven days of drought markedly reduced chickpea photochemical quenching.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
drought-stressed for 7 dayse0
Outcome
photochemical quenchinge0
Direction
marked declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants drought-stressed for 7 days brought about a marked increase in non-photochemical energy dissipation and a marked decline in photochemical quenching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After rewatering, all chickpea chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics except FM recovered to control values.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
rewateringe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a fluorescence characteristics except for FMe0
Direction
completely recoverede0
Comparator
control valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After rewatering all chlorophyll a fluorescence characteristics except for FM completely recovered and reached the control values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five and seven days of drought gradually increased chickpea anthocyanin content relative to controls.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
5 and 7 days of droughte0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
increased graduallye0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under 5 and 7 days of drought, the anthocyanin content increased gradually while the total chlorophyll content of leaves declined compared to the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five and seven days of drought reduced total leaf chlorophyll in chickpea relative to controls.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
5 and 7 days of droughte0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content of leavese0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under 5 and 7 days of drought, the anthocyanin content increased gradually while the total chlorophyll content of leaves declined compared to the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total carotenoid content in chickpea remained unchanged.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
total carotenoid contente0
Direction
remained unchangede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total carotenoid content remained unchanged during the experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea antioxidant enzyme responses to drought varied.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme responsee0
Direction
quite variablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The antioxidant enzyme response to drought treatments was quite variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea total SOD activity increased with stress duration.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
increasing duration of stresse0
Outcome
total SOD activitye0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total SOD activity upregulated with increasing duration of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea total APX activity was significantly higher only on day seven of drought.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
7th daye0
Outcome
total APX activitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total APX activity was significantly higher only on the 7th day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea total POD activity increased from day five of drought.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
5th daye0
Outcome
total POD activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total POD activity increased from the 5th day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea total GR activity did not differ significantly between treated and control groups.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
treated groupse0
Outcome
total GR activitye0
Comparator
their controlse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in the total GR activity of treated groups were not statistically significant compared to their controls throughout the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret the results as showing severe drought tolerance in chickpea variety ILC 3279 through protective mechanisms.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
ILC 3279e0
Organ / stage
vegetative stagee0
Outcome
withstands severe droughte0
Qualifier
upregulated protective mechanismse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chickpea variety ILC 3279 withstands severe drought with its upregulated protective mechanisms at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1879 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

17 papers: 2 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

rewatering · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.