Paper · 2026 · Weed Research

Strategic Integration of Rice Residue Mulch, High Seeding Rates and Pre‐Emergence Herbicide Mixtures for Weed Management in Zero‐Till Wheat

Vinay Kumar Sindhu; Ankur Chaudhary; Samar Singh; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Weed management in wheat is becoming more difficult due to declining effectiveness of post‐emergence (POST) herbicides. Although pre‐emergence (PRE) herbicides remain effective, a single application is insufficient to control all weed cohorts. Field studies were conducted in India to combine PRE herbicides with non‐chemical measures for weed control. The experiment was conducted in a split‐split plot design with three levels of rice residue mulch (0, 4, 8 t ha −1 ) in main plots, two wheat seeding rates (100 and 125 kg ha −1 ) in sub‐plots and five weed control treatments‐ pendimethalin + metribuzin (PRE), pendimethalin + metribuzin followed by ( fb ) sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (POST), pyroxasulfone (PRE) fb sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (POST), weed‐free control and weedy check in sub‐sub plots. Results revealed that rice residue mulching at 8 t ha −1 reduced the dry matter of Phalaris minor and broad‐leaved weeds by 48%–50% and 56%–60%, respectively, at 60 days after sowing (DAS) compared to weedy check. Similarly, a higher seed rate of 125 kg ha −1 reduced total weed biomass by 11%–14% compared to the lower seed rate at 60 DAS. The strategic integration of higher seeding density, 8 t ha −1 rice residue, and a PRE herbicide mixture (pendimethalin 1.5 + metribuzin 0.210 kg ha −1 , applied beneath the mulch) reduced total weed biomass by 98% and improved wheat productivity compared to weedy check, without mulch and lower seeding rate treatment combination. This study suggests for an integrated strategy tailored to the rice‐wheat system to manage weeds, rice residues and enhance wheat productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice residue mulch reduced Phalaris minor dry matter by 48%–50%.

Treatment
rice residue mulching at 8 t ha −1e0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
dry matter of Phalaris minore0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48%–50%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice residue mulching at 8 t ha −1 reduced the dry matter of Phalaris minor and broad‐leaved weeds by 48%–50% and 56%–60%, respectively, at 60 days after sowing (DAS) compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice residue mulch reduced broad-leaved weed dry matter by 56%–60%.

Treatment
rice residue mulching at 8 t ha −1e0
Interactor
broad‐leaved weedse0weed
Outcome
dry matter of Phalaris minor and broad‐leaved weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
56%–60%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice residue mulching at 8 t ha −1 reduced the dry matter of Phalaris minor and broad‐leaved weeds by 48%–50% and 56%–60%, respectively, at 60 days after sowing (DAS) compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher seed rate reduced total weed biomass by 11%–14%.

Treatment
higher seed rate of 125 kg ha −1e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11%–14%e0
Comparator
lower seed ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher seed rate of 125 kg ha −1 reduced total weed biomass by 11%–14% compared to the lower seed rate at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated density, residue and herbicide reduced total weed biomass by 98%.

Treatment
higher seeding density, 8 t ha −1 rice residue, and a PRE herbicide mixture (pendimethalin 1.5 + metribuzin 0.210 kg ha −1 , applied beneath the mulch)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
98%e0
Comparator
weedy check, without mulch and lower seeding rate treatment combinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher seeding density, 8 t ha −1 rice residue, and a PRE herbicide mixture (pendimethalin 1.5 + metribuzin 0.210 kg ha −1 , applied beneath the mulch) reduced total weed biomass by 98% and improved wheat productivity compared to weedy check, without mulch and lower seeding rate treatment combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated treatment improved wheat productivity.

Treatment
higher seeding density, 8 t ha −1 rice residue, and a PRE herbicide mixture (pendimethalin 1.5 + metribuzin 0.210 kg ha −1 , applied beneath the mulch)e0
Outcome
wheat productivitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
weedy check, without mulch and lower seeding rate treatment combinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher seeding density, 8 t ha −1 rice residue, and a PRE herbicide mixture (pendimethalin 1.5 + metribuzin 0.210 kg ha −1 , applied beneath the mulch) reduced total weed biomass by 98% and improved wheat productivity compared to weedy check, without mulch and lower seeding rate treatment combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1487 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Oryza sativa · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Oryza sativa · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 46 positive, 2 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

mulching · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.