Paper · 2026 · BMC Plant Biology

Enhancing growth and nutrient uptake of (Zea mays L.) through nano-potassium fertilization: a comparative assessment with conventional K sources

Haidar Alhassan; Mahmoud Oudeh; Loay Dehia; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of soil-applied, foliar-applied, and nano-potassium fertilization on nutrient uptake and content in maize (Zea mays L.). A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate conventional and nano-K fertilizers at recommended, half, and double rates, as well as integrated combinations. The results demonstrated significant improvements in plant nutrient content under all potassium treatments compared with the unfertilized control. Nitrogen content increased markedly, with the highest level observed in the double-rate nano-potassium treatment (T9, 1.77%), representing a 131% increase over the control. Integrated and combined fertilization treatments (T6–T8) also enhanced nitrogen content (1.667–1.71%, 117–123% increase). Phosphorus content was highest under nano-potassium at the recommended rate (T4, 0.611%), and combined or integrated treatments further improved P uptake. Potassium accumulation peaked under conventional soil application (T2, 2.18%), while nano-potassium treatments provided a more balanced nutrient uptake and improved efficiency. The observed enhancements in nutrient content are attributed to the synergistic roles of potassium in activating enzymatic processes, improving root development, and facilitating nutrient translocation, which collectively optimize nitrogen and phosphorus assimilation. These findings highlight the potential of nano-potassium fertilizers, especially when applied in integrated strategies, to increase nutrient-use efficiency and reduce total fertilizer inputs. The study supports the application of nano-K as a sustainable alternative to conventional potassium sources, offering opportunities for improved maize productivity and sustainable nutrient management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All potassium treatments significantly improved plant nutrient content against the unfertilized control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
all potassium treatmentse0
Outcome
plant nutrient contente0
Direction
improvementse0
Comparator
unfertilized controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant improvements in plant nutrient content under all potassium treatments compared with the unfertilized control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–457 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-rate nano-potassium produced the highest nitrogen content, 1.77%, a 131% increase over control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
double-rate nano-potassium treatmente0
Outcome
Nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
131%e0
Qualifier
1.77%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen content increased markedly, with the highest level observed in the double-rate nano-potassium treatment (T9, 1.77%), representing a 131% increase over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–630 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated and combined treatments enhanced nitrogen content to 1.667–1.71%, a 117–123% increase.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Integrated and combined fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
nitrogen contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
1.667–1.71%e0
Qualifier
117–123% increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated and combined fertilization treatments (T6–T8) also enhanced nitrogen content (1.667–1.71%, 117–123% increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–752 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended-rate nano-potassium gave the highest phosphorus content, 0.611%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
nano-potassium at the recommended ratee0
Outcome
Phosphorus contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.611%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus content was highest under nano-potassium at the recommended rate (T4, 0.611%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined or integrated treatments improved phosphorus uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
combined or integrated treatmentse0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined or integrated treatments further improved P uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–907 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional soil application produced peak potassium accumulation of 2.18%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
conventional soil applicatione0
Outcome
Potassium accumulatione0
Direction
peakede0
Value
2.18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium accumulation peaked under conventional soil application (T2, 2.18%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-potassium treatments provided more balanced nutrient uptake and improved efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
nano-potassium treatmentse0
Outcome
more balanced nutrient uptake and improved efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nano-potassium treatments provided a more balanced nutrient uptake and improved efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1084 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–155 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute nutrient gains to potassium activating enzymes, improving roots and aiding nutrient transport.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Compound
potassiume0
Outcome
enhancements in nutrient contente0
Qualifier
activating enzymatic processes, improving root development, and facilitating nutrient translocatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhancements in nutrient content are attributed to the synergistic roles of potassium in activating enzymatic processes, improving root development, and facilitating nutrient translocation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1287 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–155 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors support nano-K as a sustainable alternative to conventional potassium sources.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
application of nano-K as a sustainable alternative to conventional potassium sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study supports the application of nano-K as a sustainable alternative to conventional potassium sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1654 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–155 · show in text ↑

potassium · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

96 papers: 74 positive, 22 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 67 positive, 10 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.