Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional soil application produced peak potassium accumulation of 2.18%.

A claim from Enhancing growth and nutrient uptake of (Zea mays L.) through nano-potassium fertilization: a comparative assessment with conventional K sources · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional soil application produced peak potassium accumulation of 2.18%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
conventional soil applicatione0
Outcome
Potassium accumulatione0
Direction
peakede0
Value
2.18%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium accumulation peaked under conventional soil application (T2, 2.18%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–986
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–155

Title

Enhancing growth and nutrient uptake of (Zea mays L.) through nano-potassium fertilization: a comparative assessment with conventional K sources

Haidar Alhassan; Mahmoud Oudeh; Loay Dehia; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2026. doi:10.1186/s12870-026-08615-6

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-cb12f37fbb70b80a4816eb46d200669f032c0e1651ea736fd44f1aa1104246a0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.