Paper · 2026 · Food Science & Nutrition

Physico‐Nutritional Profiling and Assessment of Proteins as Well as Soluble and Insoluble Phenolic Acids in Gamma Irradiated Wheat Grains Through SWATH ‐ MS and HPLC Analysis and Their Functionality

S. Saxena; S. Kumar; D. K. Maurya; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Wheat is an important staple agri‐commodity that incurs extensive qualitative and quantitative losses during extended storage due to insect pest infestations if not subjected to fumigation. Owing to the limited information pertaining to the impact of gamma irradiation on the storage proteins, phenolic acids and associated functionality during extended storage, the current investigation was directed towards elucidating the impact of gamma irradiation (from Cobalt‐60) on these attributes while addressing insect pest disinfestation in wheat grains. SWATH‐MS‐based proteomics affirmed the retention of prolamines including gliadins, glutenin, and globulins, the major storage proteins in wheat upon radiation treatment. A differential effect was observed on the total phenolics level (both soluble free and conjugated, and insoluble phenolics) upon irradiation. The wholesomeness in terms of functional attributes was assessed through three key assays, namely antioxidant capacity (for redox homeostasis potential), antimutagenicity (for genome stability), and anti‐proliferative activity (for evaluating potential of suppressing growth of unregulated cells). These activities were not found to be perturbed in radiation processed grains. The wheat extract exhibited anti‐proliferative activity in a cell line (A549) plausibly attributed to the redox and ROS homeostasis which further enhanced in radiation treated grains. The current findings while advocating the efficacy of gamma radiation processing to achieve pest disinfestations in wheat grains indicated the retention/enhancement of functional wholesomeness of radiation treated wheat grains during extended storage under ambient condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat storage proteins were retained after irradiation.

Treatment
radiation treatmente1
Outcome
retention of prolamines including gliadins, glutenin, and globulinse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat upon radiation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–729 · show in text ↑
e1

“SWATH‐MS‐based proteomics affirmed the retention of prolamines including gliadins, glutenin, and globulins, the major storage proteins in wheat upon radiation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–729 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation had a differential effect on soluble and insoluble total phenolics.

Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
total phenolics levele0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A differential effect was observed on the total phenolics level (both soluble free and conjugated, and insoluble phenolics) upon irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant capacity of irradiated wheat grain was not perturbed.

Treatment
radiation processed grainse1
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye1
Direction
not found to be perturbede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an important staple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“antioxidant capacity (for redox homeostasis potential), antimutagenicity (for genome stability), and anti‐proliferative activity (for evaluating potential of suppressing growth of unregulated cells). These activities were not found to be perturbed in radiation processed grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antimutagenicity of irradiated wheat grain was not perturbed.

Treatment
radiation processed grainse1
Outcome
antimutagenicitye1
Direction
not found to be perturbede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an important staple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“antioxidant capacity (for redox homeostasis potential), antimutagenicity (for genome stability), and anti‐proliferative activity (for evaluating potential of suppressing growth of unregulated cells). These activities were not found to be perturbed in radiation processed grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anti-proliferative activity of irradiated wheat grain was not perturbed.

Treatment
radiation processed grainse1
Outcome
anti‐proliferative activitye1
Direction
not found to be perturbede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an important staple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“antioxidant capacity (for redox homeostasis potential), antimutagenicity (for genome stability), and anti‐proliferative activity (for evaluating potential of suppressing growth of unregulated cells). These activities were not found to be perturbed in radiation processed grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1248 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat extract showed anti-proliferative activity in an A549 cell line.

Outcome
anti‐proliferative activity in a cell line (A549)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat extract exhibited anti‐proliferative activity in a cell line (A549)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anti-proliferative activity was enhanced in radiation-treated wheat grain.

Treatment
radiation treated grainse0
Outcome
anti‐proliferative activitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat extract exhibited anti‐proliferative activity in a cell line (A549) plausibly attributed to the redox and ROS homeostasis which further enhanced in radiation treated grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1432 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute wheat extract anti-proliferative activity plausibly to redox and ROS homeostasis.

Outcome
anti‐proliferative activitye0
Qualifier
redox and ROS homeostasise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat extract exhibited anti‐proliferative activity in a cell line (A549) plausibly attributed to the redox and ROS homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1381 · show in text ↑

radiation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.