Paper · 2026 · Irrigation Science

Rootstock-specific responses of ‘Rojo Brillante’ persimmon grafted onto Diospyros lotus and Diospyros virginiana to irrigation dose and planting layout, with implications for water status, fruit abscission and irrigation water productivity

Armand Román; Pau Martí; Pablo González-Altozano; et al.

11
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The ‘Rojo Brillante’ persimmon ( Diospyros kaki ) is gaining relevance as an alternative to citrus in Mediterranean semiarid regions. This study evaluated the effects of irrigation dose (100% and 115% of a baseline irrigation dose, BID), planting layout (2.5 × 5 m and 3.5 × 5 m), and rootstock ( Diospyros lotus and Diospyros virginiana ) on midday stem water potential (Ψ S, a plant-based indicator of tree water status), yield, vegetative growth, irrigation water productivity (IWP), and fruit abscission during the juvenile to mature transition (4 to 7-year-old trees) in southeast Spain. Across 2012–2014, Ψ S in 100% and 115% treatments generally remained above − 1.30 MPa, whereas dense spacing under 100% BID caused transient severe summer stress (Ψ S < -1.30 MPa) in trees, coinciding with reduced productivity in D. lotus . Yield was largely unaffected by increasing irrigation dose, and D. virginiana induced greater vigour than D. lotus without a consistent yield advantage, partly associated with lower crop load and greater physiological fruit drop. At the hectare scale, the denser layout tended to improve productivity. To optimise irrigation for D. virginiana , a 2015 study compared two irrigation strategies, 110% BID and sustained deficit irrigation at 70% BID, against a D. lotus control receiving 100% BID, all under the standard 3.5 × 5 m planting layout. SDI reduced abscission relative to flowering by about 14%, maintained yield, and maximised IWP. Fruit quality was not assessed. Overall, the results support rootstock-specific irrigation scheduling and identify deficit-based strategies as promising for improving water productivity without compromising yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Midday stem water potential in the 100% and 115% irrigation treatments generally stayed above the stress threshold.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Outcome
midday stem water potentiale1
Qualifier
treatments generally remained abovee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatments generally remained above”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“midday stem water potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dense planting under 100% of the baseline irrigation dose caused transient severe summer water stress in trees, coinciding with reduced productivity in D. lotus.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Treatment
dense spacing under 100% BIDe0
Outcome
severe summer stresse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“dense spacing under 100% BID caused transient severe summer stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was largely unaffected by increasing the irrigation dose.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Treatment
increasing irrigation dosee0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
largely unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield was largely unaffected by increasing irrigation dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. virginiana rootstock induced greater vigour than D. lotus.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Treatment
D. virginianae0
Outcome
vigoure0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
D. lotuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“D. virginiana induced greater vigour than D. lotus without a consistent yield advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. virginiana gave no consistent yield advantage over D. lotus.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Treatment
D. virginianae0
Outcome
yield advantagee0
Direction
without a consistente0
Comparator
D. lotuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“D. virginiana induced greater vigour than D. lotus without a consistent yield advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–994 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lack of a yield advantage for D. virginiana was partly associated with lower crop load and greater physiological fruit drop.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Treatment
D. virginianae0
Outcome
physiological fruit drope0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“D. virginiana induced greater vigour than D. lotus without a consistent yield advantage, partly associated with lower crop load and greater physiological fruit drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the hectare scale the denser planting layout tended to improve productivity.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Treatment
denser layoute0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“the denser layout tended to improve productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sustained deficit irrigation reduced fruit abscission relative to flowering by about 14% against a D. lotus control at 100% BID.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Treatment
SDIe0
Outcome
abscission relative to floweringe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 14%e0
Comparator
D. lotus control receiving 100% BIDe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“SDI reduced abscission relative to flowering by about 14%, maintained yield, and maximised IWP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1482 · show in text ↑
e1

“a D. lotus control receiving 100% BID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1336 · show in text ↑
e2

“sustained deficit irrigation at 70% BID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sustained deficit irrigation maintained yield relative to the control.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Treatment
SDIe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
D. lotus control receiving 100% BIDe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“SDI reduced abscission relative to flowering by about 14%, maintained yield, and maximised IWP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1482 · show in text ↑
e1

“a D. lotus control receiving 100% BID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sustained deficit irrigation maximised irrigation water productivity.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Treatment
SDIe0
Outcome
IWPe0
Direction
maximisede0
Comparator
D. lotus control receiving 100% BIDe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“SDI reduced abscission relative to flowering by about 14%, maintained yield, and maximised IWP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1482 · show in text ↑
e1

“a D. lotus control receiving 100% BID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1336 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend rootstock-specific irrigation scheduling and deficit-based strategies to improve water productivity without compromising yield.

Taxon
persimmonDiospyrost0
Outcome
rootstock-specific irrigation schedulinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“the results support rootstock-specific irrigation scheduling and identify deficit-based strategies as promising for improving water productivity without compromising yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1696 · show in text ↑

Diospyros virginiana · yield · DiospyrosPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · yield · DiospyrosPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · DiospyrosResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.