Paper · 2026 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Synergistic regulation mechanism of N in sugarcane-soil systems through 15N tracer and ecological stoichiometry

Ning Zhong; Jinsheng Huang; Qiuliang Cai

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sugarcane is a vital sugar crop in China. Low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is a key constraint to the sustainable development of the industry. To comprehensively evaluate the regulatory effects of N management on the sugarcane-soil system and its nutrient coordination, a controlled pot experiment was carried out using the Guitang 46 sugarcane variety in Baise, Guangxi. Six N treatment strategies were implemented: no N input (control), split applications at low, medium, and high levels, and one-time applications at medium and high levels. A combination of conventional agronomic measurements, 15 N isotope tracing, and ecological stoichiometry analysis was employed to investigate the influence of these treatments on (i) sugarcane growth (biomass accumulation, N uptake and allocation), (ii) soil properties (physicochemical characteristics), and (iii) system-level nutrient balance (C:N:P stoichiometric relationships within the plant–soil system).The findings revealed that the medium one-time N application delivered the most favorable outcomes. Specifically, it enhanced stem dry matter production (327.75 g) and total plant N uptake (4.79 g/plant) by 42.87% and 62.37%, respectively, compared to the control. Furthermore, it achieved a 15 N recovery rate of 40.78% and minimized N losses to just 20.66%. This treatment also contributed to an optimal stoichiometric balance—reflected in a stem C:N ratio of 28.5, a new leaf N:P ratio of 14.2, and a soil C:N ratio of 18.7, closely aligning with the ideal microbial decomposition threshold. Additionally, this approach significantly improved soil organic matter (OM, 63.97 g/kg), increased available N, and sustained stable invertase and urease enzyme activity. Taken together, these results demonstrate that a medium one-time N application simultaneously promotes high sugarcane yield, efficient N utilization, enhanced soil quality, and nutrient balance within the crop-soil system. These findings provide robust scientific support for reducing fertilizer input while maintaining productivity in sugarcane cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium one-time nitrogen increased stem dry matter production by 42.87% versus control.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium one-time N applicationt1
Outcome
stem dry matter productione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
42.87%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“it enhanced stem dry matter production (327.75 g) and total plant N uptake (4.79 g/plant) by 42.87% and 62.37%, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“the medium one-time N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium one-time nitrogen increased plant nitrogen uptake by 62.37% versus control.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium one-time N applicationt1
Outcome
total plant N uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
62.37%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“it enhanced stem dry matter production (327.75 g) and total plant N uptake (4.79 g/plant) by 42.87% and 62.37%, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“the medium one-time N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium one-time nitrogen achieved a 40.78% 15N recovery rate.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium one-time N applicationt1
Outcome
15 N recovery ratee0
Value
40.78%e0

Verbatim

e0

“it achieved a 15 N recovery rate of 40.78% and minimized N losses to just 20.66%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“the medium one-time N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium one-time nitrogen limited nitrogen losses to 20.66%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium one-time N applicationt1
Outcome
N lossese0
Direction
minimizede0
Value
20.66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it achieved a 15 N recovery rate of 40.78% and minimized N losses to just 20.66%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“the medium one-time N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium one-time nitrogen produced a stem C:N ratio of 28.5.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium one-time N applicationt1
Outcome
stem C:N ratioe0
Value
28.5e0

Verbatim

e0

“reflected in a stem C:N ratio of 28.5, a new leaf N:P ratio of 14.2, and a soil C:N ratio of 18.7, closely aligning with the ideal microbial decomposition threshold.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“the medium one-time N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium one-time nitrogen produced a new leaf N:P ratio of 14.2.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium one-time N applicationt1
Outcome
new leaf N:P ratioe0
Value
14.2e0

Verbatim

e0

“reflected in a stem C:N ratio of 28.5, a new leaf N:P ratio of 14.2, and a soil C:N ratio of 18.7, closely aligning with the ideal microbial decomposition threshold.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“the medium one-time N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium one-time nitrogen produced a soil C:N ratio of 18.7.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium one-time N applicationt1
Outcome
soil C:N ratioe0
Value
18.7e0

Verbatim

e0

“reflected in a stem C:N ratio of 28.5, a new leaf N:P ratio of 14.2, and a soil C:N ratio of 18.7, closely aligning with the ideal microbial decomposition threshold.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“the medium one-time N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium one-time nitrogen significantly improved soil organic matter to 63.97 g/kg.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium one-time N applicationt1
Outcome
soil organic mattere0
Direction
improvede0
Value
63.97 g/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“this approach significantly improved soil organic matter (OM, 63.97 g/kg), increased available N, and sustained stable invertase and urease enzyme activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“the medium one-time N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium one-time nitrogen increased soil available nitrogen.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium one-time N applicationt1
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“this approach significantly improved soil organic matter (OM, 63.97 g/kg), increased available N, and sustained stable invertase and urease enzyme activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“the medium one-time N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium one-time nitrogen maintained stable invertase and urease activity.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium one-time N applicationt1
Outcome
invertase and urease enzyme activitye0
Direction
stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“this approach significantly improved soil organic matter (OM, 63.97 g/kg), increased available N, and sustained stable invertase and urease enzyme activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
t1

“the medium one-time N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1016 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

in vitro · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · soil: biology · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

in vitro · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.