Paper · 2026 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Silicon-mediated enhancement of wheat tolerance to drought stress: a comparative study of antioxidant activity, photosynthesis, secondary metabolites, and yield

ABIDA KAUSAR; RIDA YASMEEN; SHAHID IQBAL; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress (DS) is a major constraint on optimal plant growth and yield. Agricultural researchers have been actively exploring fertilizers that can enhance crop production under DS conditions. Silicon (Si) application has emerged as a promising strategy for managing DS in various crops. This study investigated the potential of Si soil drenching to mitigate the adverse effects of varying levels of DS (at 100%, 70%, and 40% field capacity) in wheat. Two varieties (Ujala-2016 and FSD-2008) were used to evaluate the influence of Si (2.5 mM) on antioxidant activity, oxidative burst, secondary metabolites, growth, and yield. The results indicated that Si drenching positively affected all growth parameters, yield attributes, antioxidant enzymes, and secondary metabolite production. However, malondialdehyde (MDA) production increased significantly under DS, with the severity of DS and varietal differences influencing its accumulation. The Ujala-2016 variety had superior growth, biological yield, 1000-grain weight, spike length, number of tillers, photosynthetic efficiency, antioxidant levels, osmotic adjustment, and secondary metabolite production when treated with Si. These findings suggest that Ujala-2016 is a more drought-tolerant variety. While increasing DS severity negatively impacted yield, Si treatment can be considered a valuable soil amendment for mitigating the effects of drought and ensuring food security in arid and semiarid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon drenching positively affected wheat growth parameters and yield attributes.

Treatment
Si drenchinge0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributese0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si drenching positively affected all growth parameters, yield attributes, antioxidant enzymes, and secondary metabolite production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon drenching positively affected wheat antioxidant enzymes and secondary metabolite production.

Treatment
Si drenchinge0
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes, and secondary metabolite productione0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si drenching positively affected all growth parameters, yield attributes, antioxidant enzymes, and secondary metabolite production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Malondialdehyde production increased significantly under drought stress.

Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“malondialdehyde (MDA) production increased significantly under DS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ujala-2016 had superior growth, yield traits and physiology when treated with silicon.

Material
Ujala-2016e0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
superior growth, biological yield, 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ujala-2016 variety had superior growth, biological yield, 1000-grain weight, spike length, number of tillers, photosynthetic efficiency, antioxidant levels, osmotic adjustment, and secondary metabolite production when treated with Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ujala-2016 had superior photosynthetic efficiency, antioxidant levels and osmotic adjustment with silicon.

Material
Ujala-2016e0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiency, antioxidant levels, osmotic adjustmente0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ujala-2016 variety had superior growth, biological yield, 1000-grain weight, spike length, number of tillers, photosynthetic efficiency, antioxidant levels, osmotic adjustment, and secondary metabolite production when treated with Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ujala-2016 was interpreted as more drought tolerant.

Material
Ujala-2016e0
Outcome
more drought-tolerant varietye0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ujala-2016 is a more drought-tolerant variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing drought severity negatively impacted yield.

Treatment
increasing DS severitye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
negatively impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing DS severity negatively impacted yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

application · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

128 papers: 18 positive, 110 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.