Paper · 2026 · Industrial Crops and Products

Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar: Modulating soil biochemical properties, microbial communities, and their functions

Baoyin Zhou; Yatong Chu; Han Zeng; et al.

16
claims
45
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Short-term continuous cropping poses major challenges to peanut production, characterized by soil degradation, microbial dysbiosis, and substantial yield decline. This study evaluated straw biochar as a sustainable soil management strategy to alleviate these obstacles in short-term continuous cropping systems. A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC). Key indicators, including photosynthetic parameters, soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions (POC, DOC), pH, total nitrogen (TN), water content (SWC), enzyme activities (invertase, N-acetyl-β- D -glucosaminidase, β-glucosidase), microbial community composition, carbon utilization capacity, and peanut yield were assessed to unravel the regulatory mechanisms. Results showed that straw biochar significantly enhanced peanut leaf SPAD values, actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII), and net photosynthetic rate (P N ) by 26.56%, 11.17%, and 35.92%, respectively, compared to TP. Furthermore, BC treatment significantly increased SWC, SOC, POC, DOC, and TN, and effectively increased soil pH over the three years. These biochemical improvements were coupled with consistently higher activities of key enzymes. Crucially, biochar restructured the soil microbiome by enriching beneficial bacterial genera (e.g., Chthoniobacter , Pseudomonas ) and, more importantly, significantly suppressing the relative abundance of potential fungal pathogens, particularly Fusarium and Aspergillus . Predicted functional profiling showed an enhancement in chemoheterotrophy, and Biolog EcoPlates analysis revealed a time-dependent, cumulative enhancement of soil microbial carbon utilization, which largely recovered to pre-cultivation levels after three years. Collectively, these results demonstrate that straw biochar alleviates short-term continuous cropping stress by modulating soil biochemical properties—specifically through pH elevation, nutrient enrichment, and increased enzyme activity. This improvement fosters the restoration of microbial equilibrium and functional diversity, which in turn enhances peanut photosynthesis and yield. Consequently, straw biochar emerges as a promising sustainable solution for overcoming continuous cropping challenges. • Straw biochar improved yield of short-term continuously cropped peanut. • Biochar enhanced soil biochemical properties including SOC, pH and enzymes. • Biochar enriched beneficial Pseudomonas and suppressed pathogenic Fusarium . • Biochar mitigates obstacles of short-term continuous peanut cropping.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw biochar significantly enhanced peanut leaf SPAD values by 26.56% compared with traditional planting.

Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
straw biochare1
Outcome
leaf SPAD valuese1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
26.56%e1
Comparator
TPe1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“straw biochar significantly enhanced peanut leaf SPAD values, actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII), and net photosynthetic rate (P N ) by 26.56%, 11.17%, and 35.92%, respectively, compared to TP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1013 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw biochar significantly enhanced peanut actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII) by 11.17% compared with traditional planting.

Treatment
straw biochare1
Outcome
actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII)e1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
11.17%e1
Comparator
TPe1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“straw biochar significantly enhanced peanut leaf SPAD values, actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII), and net photosynthetic rate (P N ) by 26.56%, 11.17%, and 35.92%, respectively, compared to TP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1013 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw biochar significantly enhanced peanut net photosynthetic rate by 35.92% compared with traditional planting.

Treatment
straw biochare1
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (P N )e1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
35.92%e1
Comparator
TPe1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“straw biochar significantly enhanced peanut leaf SPAD values, actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII), and net photosynthetic rate (P N ) by 26.56%, 11.17%, and 35.92%, respectively, compared to TP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1013 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BC treatment significantly increased soil water content, SOC and POC in the peanut field.

Treatment
BC treatmente2
Outcome
SWC, SOC, POCe2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“BC treatment significantly increased SWC, SOC, POC, DOC, and TN, and effectively increased soil pH over the three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1147 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BC treatment significantly increased soil DOC and TN in the peanut field.

Treatment
BC treatmente2
Outcome
DOC, and TNe2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“BC treatment significantly increased SWC, SOC, POC, DOC, and TN, and effectively increased soil pH over the three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1147 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BC treatment effectively increased soil pH in the peanut field over three years.

Treatment
BC treatmente2
Outcome
soil pHe2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“BC treatment significantly increased SWC, SOC, POC, DOC, and TN, and effectively increased soil pH over the three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1147 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw biochar consistently increased activities of key soil enzymes in peanut cropping.

Treatment
straw biochar amendment (BC)e0
Outcome
activities of key enzymese3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“These biochemical improvements were coupled with consistently higher activities of key enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1243 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar enriched the beneficial soil bacterium Pseudomonas in the peanut field.

Treatment
biochare4
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase4other
Outcome
beneficial bacterial generae4
Direction
enrichinge4
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e4

“biochar restructured the soil microbiome by enriching beneficial bacterial genera (e.g., Chthoniobacter , Pseudomonas )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1375 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar enriched the beneficial soil bacterium Chthoniobacter in the peanut field.

Treatment
biochare4
Interactor
ChthoniobacterChthoniobactere4other
Outcome
beneficial bacterial generae4
Direction
enrichinge4
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e4

“biochar restructured the soil microbiome by enriching beneficial bacterial genera (e.g., Chthoniobacter , Pseudomonas )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1375 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar suppressed the relative abundance of the potential pathogen Fusarium in the peanut field.

Treatment
biochare4
Interactor
FusariumFusariume5pathogen
Outcome
relative abundance of potential fungal pathogense5
Direction
suppressinge5
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e5

“significantly suppressing the relative abundance of potential fungal pathogens, particularly Fusarium and Aspergillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1516 · show in text ↑
e4

“biochar restructured the soil microbiome by enriching beneficial bacterial genera (e.g., Chthoniobacter , Pseudomonas )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1375 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar suppressed the relative abundance of the potential pathogen Aspergillus in the peanut field.

Treatment
biochare4
Interactor
AspergillusAspergilluse5pathogen
Outcome
relative abundance of potential fungal pathogense5
Direction
suppressinge5
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Aspergillus
Aspergillus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e5

“significantly suppressing the relative abundance of potential fungal pathogens, particularly Fusarium and Aspergillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1516 · show in text ↑
e4

“biochar restructured the soil microbiome by enriching beneficial bacterial genera (e.g., Chthoniobacter , Pseudomonas )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1375 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted functional profiling indicated an enhancement in chemoheterotrophy of the soil microbiome under straw biochar amendment.

Treatment
straw biochar amendment (BC)e0
Outcome
chemoheterotrophye6
Direction
enhancemente6
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e6

“Predicted functional profiling showed an enhancement in chemoheterotrophy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1592 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biolog EcoPlates analysis showed a time-dependent, cumulative enhancement of soil microbial carbon utilization under straw biochar amendment.

Treatment
straw biochar amendment (BC)e0
Outcome
soil microbial carbon utilizatione7
Direction
enhancemente7
Qualifier
time-dependent, cumulativee7
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e7

“Biolog EcoPlates analysis revealed a time-dependent, cumulative enhancement of soil microbial carbon utilization, which largely recovered to pre-cultivation levels after three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1779 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial carbon utilization under straw biochar amendment largely recovered to pre-cultivation levels after three years.

Treatment
straw biochar amendment (BC)e0
Outcome
soil microbial carbon utilizatione7
Direction
largely recoverede7
Comparator
pre-cultivation levelse7
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e7

“Biolog EcoPlates analysis revealed a time-dependent, cumulative enhancement of soil microbial carbon utilization, which largely recovered to pre-cultivation levels after three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1779 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Straw biochar may alleviate short-term continuous cropping stress in peanut by modulating soil biochemical properties.

Treatment
straw biochare7
Outcome
short-term continuous cropping stresse7
Qualifier
modulating soil biochemical propertiese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing peanut production under short-term continuous cropping with straw biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e7

“straw biochar alleviates short-term continuous cropping stress by modulating soil biochemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–1930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw biochar improved the yield of short-term continuously cropped peanut compared with traditional planting.

Treatment
Straw biochare6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
improvede6
Qualifier
short-term continuously croppede6
Comparator
traditional planting (TP)e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Straw biochar improved yield of short-term continuously cropped peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2287–2357 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-year field experiment (2021–2023) was conducted to compare traditional planting (TP) with straw biochar amendment (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–438 · show in text ↑

other · soil: chemistry · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

biochar · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

biochar · physiology: photosynthesis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · physiology: enzyme activity · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · physiology: enzyme activity · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biochar · soil: biology · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · soil: biology · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.