Paper · 2026 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

PGPB Bacillus Megaterium AFI1 and Paenibacillus Nicotianae AFI2 Improve Nutrient Uptake and Stimulate Adaptation of Wheat Under Nickel Exposure

Veronika N. Pishchik; Galina V. Mirskaya; Polina S. Filippova; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Due to the increased anthropogenic load, crops are polluted with heavy metals, including nickel (Ni). This is a serious environmental problem, as Ni penetrates barrier-free into cereal crops and accumulates in the grains used by humans and animals for food. Wheat is one of the main staple crops, cultivated in many countries. This study suggested that plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) with varying enzymatic activities could help wheat plants to cope with Ni stress by reducing Ni toxicity and regulating the metal’s homeostasis. PGPB Bacillus megaterium AFI1 has a strong phosphate-solubilizing activity and produces siderophores, while Paenibacillus nicotianae AFI2 has nitrogen-fixing and silicate-solubilizing activities. Both strains produce indole and polysaccharides and have 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity. PGPB under Ni exposure (100 mg/kg of soil) significantly increased grain yield (by 34–42%) and decreased (by 20–33%) Ni content in wheat grains. PGPB also decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) and H2O2 levels in wheat plants under Ni stress. The contents of iron (Fe), boron (B), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) decreased significantly and potassium (K) and zinc (Zn) oppositely increased significantly in all plant organs under Ni exposure. The inoculation with AFI1 mainly increased P and Fe, and the inoculation with AFI2 increased N and silica (Si) in wheat grains under Ni stress. In our experiments, under nickel exposure PGPB Bacillus megaterium AFI1 and Paenibacillus nicotianae AFI2 increased antioxidant protection of plants by decreasing the level of stress ethylene and regulating the homeostasis of nutrients in wheat plants. These PGPB can be considered as promising candidates for the development of biologicals to be used for growing plants in soils with low levels of nickel contamination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB increased wheat grain yield by 34–42% under nickel exposure.

Treatment
PGPBe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34–42%e0
Qualifier
Ni exposure (100 mg/kg of soil)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPB under Ni exposure (100 mg/kg of soil) significantly increased grain yield (by 34–42%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB reduced nickel content in wheat grains by 20–33%.

Treatment
PGPBe1
Outcome
Ni content in wheat grainse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
20–33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased (by 20–33%) Ni content in wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGPB under Ni exposure (100 mg/kg of soil) significantly increased grain yield (by 34–42%) and decreased (by 20–33%) Ni content in wheat grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB decreased malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide levels in wheat under nickel stress.

Treatment
PGPBe0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) and H2O2 levelse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPB also decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) and H2O2 levels in wheat plants under Ni stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel exposure significantly decreased iron, boron, nitrogen and phosphorus in plant organs.

Organ / stage
all plant organse0
Treatment
Ni exposuree0
Outcome
contents of iron (Fe), boron (B), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of iron (Fe), boron (B), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) decreased significantly and potassium (K) and zinc (Zn) oppositely increased significantly in all plant organs under Ni exposure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel exposure significantly increased potassium and zinc in all plant organs.

Organ / stage
all plant organse0
Treatment
Ni exposuree0
Outcome
potassium (K) and zinc (Zn)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium (K) and zinc (Zn) oppositely increased significantly in all plant organs under Ni exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AFI1 inoculation mainly increased phosphorus and iron in wheat grains under nickel stress.

Organ / stage
wheat grainse1
Treatment
inoculation with AFI1e0
Interactor
AFI1e0symbiont
Outcome
P and Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Ni stresse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation with AFI1 mainly increased P and Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1337 · show in text ↑
e1

“The inoculation with AFI1 mainly increased P and Fe, and the inoculation with AFI2 increased N and silica (Si) in wheat grains under Ni stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AFI2 inoculation increased nitrogen and silica in wheat grains under nickel stress.

Organ / stage
wheat grainse0
Treatment
inoculation with AFI2e0
Interactor
AFI2e0symbiont
Outcome
N and silica (Si)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation with AFI2 increased N and silica (Si) in wheat grains under Ni stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1428 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two PGPB strains increased antioxidant protection through lower stress ethylene and nutrient homeostasis.

Interactor
Bacillus megaterium AFI1Priestia megateriume0symbiont
Second interactor
Paenibacillus nicotianae AFI2Paenibacillus nicotianaee0symbiont
Outcome
increased antioxidant protection of plantse0
Qualifier
decreasing the level of stress ethylene and regulating the homeostasis of nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPB Bacillus megaterium AFI1 and Paenibacillus nicotianae AFI2 increased antioxidant protection of plants by decreasing the level of stress ethylene and regulating the homeostasis of nutrients in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1681 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider the PGPB promising for cultivation in lightly nickel-contaminated soils.

Outcome
promising candidates for the development of biologicals to be used for growing plants in soils with low levels of nickel contaminatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These PGPB can be considered as promising candidates for the development of biologicals to be used for growing plants in soils with low levels of nickel contamination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

heavy metal · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 3 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.