Paper · 2004 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Round Ready Flex Cotton: Glyphosate Tolerance and Weed Management 2002-2003

William B. McCloskey; K. O. Adu‐Tutu; T. Vint Hicks

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The tolerance of Roundup Ready (RR) Flex cotton to topical Roundup Weathermax (glyphosate) applications and weed management programs in RR Flex cotton were studied in 2002 and 2003 at the University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center. RR Flex cotton demonstrated excellent tolerance to glyphosate as measured by flower pollen shed and lint yield when sprayed topically with glyphosate at 2.25 lb ae/A four times (at the 3 leaf, 6 node, 10 node and 14 node growth stages). Line 1445 containing the current commercial RR genetic construct had a flower sterility/pollen shed rating of 4.6 (1 equals full pollen shed and 5 equals no pollen shed) on 28 June 2003 compared to ratings of 1.1 to 1.9 in lines containing the RR Flex genetic construct. Cotton yields followed a similar pattern with 1145 yielding 386 lb seed cotton/A compared to 1477 to 1894 lb seed cotton/A for the best lines containing the RR Flex genetic construct (yields were generally low because all lines had a Cocker genetic background that is not adapted to hot desert production conditions.) The presence of the RR gene did not affect the yield of genotype pairs that were identical except for the presence or absence of the RR Flex genetic construct. In the weed management study, delaying the first topical glyphosate application resulted in larger, more difficult to control weeds and reduced cotton yield by allowing greater early season competition between weeds and cotton. The best weed control programs included early (1 to 2 leaf growth stage) topical applications at rates greater than 0.75 lb ae/A and a second Roundup application after the first post-planting irrigation (10 node growth stage). The data also suggested that there may be significant value in making a layby, directed-broadcast application that includes a residual herbicide such as prometryn at layby.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RR Flex cotton tolerated four topical glyphosate sprays as measured by pollen shed and lint yield.

Material
RR Flexe0
Treatment
glyphosate at 2.25 lb ae/A four timese0
Outcome
flower pollen shed and lint yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“RR Flex cotton demonstrated excellent tolerance to glyphosate as measured by flower pollen shed and lint yield when sprayed topically with glyphosate at 2.25 lb ae/A four times (at the 3 leaf, 6 node, 10 node and 14 node growth stages).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line 1445 had more flower sterility than RR Flex lines.

Material
Line 1445e0
Outcome
flower sterility/pollen shed ratinge0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
4.6e0
Qualifier
ratings of 1.1 to 1.9e0
Comparator
lines containing the RR Flex genetic constructe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“Line 1445 containing the current commercial RR genetic construct had a flower sterility/pollen shed rating of 4.6 (1 equals full pollen shed and 5 equals no pollen shed) on 28 June 2003 compared to ratings of 1.1 to 1.9 in lines containing the RR Flex genetic construct.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line 1145 yielded less seed cotton than the best RR Flex lines.

Material
1145e0
Outcome
seed cottone0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
386 lb seed cotton/Ae0
Qualifier
1477 to 1894 lb seed cotton/Ae0
Comparator
best lines containing the RR Flex genetic constructe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cotton yields followed a similar pattern with 1145 yielding 386 lb seed cotton/A compared to 1477 to 1894 lb seed cotton/A for the best lines containing the RR Flex genetic construct”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–930 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presence of the RR gene did not affect yield in otherwise identical genotype pairs.

Gene
RR genee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“The presence of the RR gene did not affect the yield of genotype pairs that were identical except for the presence or absence of the RR Flex genetic construct.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying the first glyphosate application led to larger weeds that were harder to control.

Treatment
delaying the first topical glyphosate applicatione0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
larger, more difficult to control weedse0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“delaying the first topical glyphosate application resulted in larger, more difficult to control weeds and reduced cotton yield by allowing greater early season competition between weeds and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying the first glyphosate application reduced cotton yield.

Treatment
delaying the first topical glyphosate applicatione0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delaying the first topical glyphosate application resulted in larger, more difficult to control weeds and reduced cotton yield by allowing greater early season competition between weeds and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1452 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The best weed control programs used early topical glyphosate above 0.75 lb ae/A and a second Roundup application after first irrigation.

Treatment
early (1 to 2 leaf growth stage) topical applications at rates greater than 0.75 lb ae/A and a second Roundup applicatione0
Outcome
best weed control programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best weed control programs included early (1 to 2 leaf growth stage) topical applications at rates greater than 0.75 lb ae/A and a second Roundup application after the first post-planting irrigation (10 node growth stage).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1680 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A layby application with a residual herbicide such as prometryn may have significant value.

Treatment
layby, directed-broadcast application that includes a residual herbicide such as prometryne0
Outcome
significant valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data also suggested that there may be significant value in making a layby, directed-broadcast application that includes a residual herbicide such as prometryn at layby.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1853 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

61 papers: 35 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.