Paper · 2005 · 中国农业科学:英文版

Fertilization Management for Improving Quality Properties of Spring Wheat in Northeast China

LIUXiao-bing; ZHANGQiu-ying; JINJian; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fertilization management to improve quality properties of spring wheat cultivars has received little research attention in Northeast China. In this study, the effects of different fertilization management regimes on the quality properties of spring wheat cultivar New Kehan 9 (Triticum aestivum L.) were investigated for two years. The results showed that fertilization consistently increased wheat yield, and the highest yield was obtained with addition of N, P and NPK fertilizers. The NPK treatment resulted in 50% more yield than the unfertilized plot. The average increases in protein content from NPK and NP at seeding + N at anthesis over no fertilization and NP fertilizers at seeding were 2.7% and 0.90% respectively. The highest protein yields were achieved in NPK and NPK + N treatments, and the lowest protein yield was observed in the no fertilizer treatment due to both low protein content and grain yield. Fertilization increased gliadins content, but decreased glutenins content, thus the gliadins/glutenins ratios were higher in the fertilization treatments. The most obvious effect of fertilization on kernel quality was the significant increase of hardness percentage. Although the dough rheological properties were not strongly changed by fertilization, dry gluten and wet gluten were significantly increased, and the highest bread volume and bread score were found in the NPK treatment in both years. The application of 3% urea at anthesis, or applying 45 kg ha-1 of potassium sulphate at seeding, with urea and diammonium phosphate as basal applications, significantly increased protein yield and improved quality properties of this wheat cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased wheat yield, with the highest yield under N, P and NPK fertilizers.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization consistently increased wheat yield, and the highest yield was obtained with addition of N, P and NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK produced 50% more yield than the unfertilized plot.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
unfertilized plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NPK treatment resulted in 50% more yield than the unfertilized plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK raised protein content by an average 2.7% over the stated fertilizer comparators.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasese0
Value
2.7%e0
Comparator
no fertilization and NP fertilizers at seedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increases in protein content from NPK and NP at seeding + N at anthesis over no fertilization and NP fertilizers at seeding were 2.7% and 0.90% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP at seeding plus N at anthesis raised protein content by an average 0.90%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NP at seeding + N at anthesise0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasese0
Value
0.90%e0
Comparator
no fertilization and NP fertilizers at seedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increases in protein content from NPK and NP at seeding + N at anthesis over no fertilization and NP fertilizers at seeding were 2.7% and 0.90% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK and NPK plus N achieved the highest protein yields.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NPK and NPK + N treatmentse0
Outcome
protein yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest protein yields were achieved in NPK and NPK + N treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The unfertilized treatment had the lowest protein yield because protein content and grain yield were low.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
no fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest protein yield was observed in the no fertilizer treatment due to both low protein content and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased gliadins content.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fertilizatione0
Outcome
gliadins contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization increased gliadins content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization decreased glutenins content.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fertilizatione0
Outcome
glutenins contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization increased gliadins content, but decreased glutenins content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization raised gliadins/glutenins ratios.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
gliadins/glutenins ratiose0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the gliadins/glutenins ratios were higher in the fertilization treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization significantly increased kernel hardness percentage.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilizatione1
Outcome
hardness percentagee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase of hardness percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The most obvious effect of fertilization on kernel quality was the significant increase of hardness percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization did not strongly change dough rheological properties.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
dough rheological propertiese0
Direction
not strongly changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dough rheological properties were not strongly changed by fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization significantly increased dry and wet gluten.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilizatione1
Outcome
dry gluten and wet glutene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry gluten and wet gluten were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although the dough rheological properties were not strongly changed by fertilization, dry gluten and wet gluten were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1328 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK had the highest bread volume and bread score in both years.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Outcome
bread volume and bread scoree0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest bread volume and bread score were found in the NPK treatment in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 3% urea application at anthesis significantly increased protein yield and improved quality.

Taxon
wheat cultivarTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
application of 3% urea at anthesise0
Outcome
protein yield and improved quality propertiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 3% urea at anthesis, or applying 45 kg ha-1 of potassium sulphate at seeding, with urea and diammonium phosphate as basal applications, significantly increased protein yield and improved quality properties of this wheat cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium sulphate at seeding with basal urea and diammonium phosphate significantly increased protein yield and improved quality.

Taxon
wheat cultivarTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
applying 45 kg ha-1 of potassium sulphate at seeding, with urea and diammonium phosphate as basal applicationse0
Outcome
protein yield and improved quality propertiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 3% urea at anthesis, or applying 45 kg ha-1 of potassium sulphate at seeding, with urea and diammonium phosphate as basal applications, significantly increased protein yield and improved quality properties of this wheat cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1669 · show in text ↑

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

potassium sulfate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.