zinc atom · Yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)

Results differ9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ

19 claims from these papers.

Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1

1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19801990200020102020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 4

  1. Effects of Micronutrients Application to Tomato and Cucumber · 2009

  2. Effect of foliar application of boron, iron and zinc on growth, yield and economics of cucumber grown under naturally ventilated polyhouse condition · 2020

  3. Effect of Zinc Nanoparticles on Seed Priming, Growth and Production of Cucumber · 2022

  4. Effect of zinc on qualitative and quantitative traits of major vegetable crops · 2024

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5

  1. Effect of high rates of zinc on several crops grown on an irrigated plainfield sand · 1972

  2. Some responses of cucumber, grown in beds of peat, to micronutrients and pH · 1989

  3. Responses of cucumber grown in recirculating nutrient solution to gradual Mn and Zn accumulation in the root zone owing to excessive supply via the irrigation water · 2011

  4. FE, MN AND ZN ADDITION TO NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS FOR TOMATO AND CUCUMBER GROWN IN INERT SUBSTRATES · 2012

  5. Perspectives on morphology, physiology, genetic polymorphism and machine learning in cucumber grafting under zinc toxicity · 2025

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

zinc atom on Cucumis sativus (cucumber) against other targets

zinc atom · yield on other organisms