zinc atom · Yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)
19 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- FE, MN AND ZN ADDITION TO NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS FOR TOMATO AND CUCUMBER GROWN IN INERT SUBSTRATES (2012)
decreaseHigh Zn application significantly reduced cucumber yield by 8% on average in both successive crops.
Effect of high rates of zinc on several crops grown on an irrigated plainfield sand (1972)no changeHigh applied zinc generally did not reduce cucumber yield.
What separates themTest system: controlled environment · fieldCompare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 4
Effects of Micronutrients Application to Tomato and Cucumber · 2009
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Zinc Nanoparticles on Seed Priming, Growth and Production of Cucumber · 2022
- positive
- positive
Effect of zinc on qualitative and quantitative traits of major vegetable crops · 2024
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5
Effect of high rates of zinc on several crops grown on an irrigated plainfield sand · 1972
- no effect
Some responses of cucumber, grown in beds of peat, to micronutrients and pH · 1989
- no effect
- negative
- negative
FE, MN AND ZN ADDITION TO NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS FOR TOMATO AND CUCUMBER GROWN IN INERT SUBSTRATES · 2012
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.
zinc atom on Cucumis sativus (cucumber) against other targets
zinc atom · yield on other organisms
- Triticum aestivum (wheat)
- Zea mays (maize)
- Oryza sativa (rice)
- Glycine max (soybean)
- Vigna radiata (mung bean)
- Cicer arietinum (chickpea)
- Arachis hypogaea (peanut)
- Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)
- Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
- Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)
- Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
- Brassica napus (oilseed rape)