View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Male foliage biomass exceeded female foliage biomass without a significant difference.
Outcomebiomass value of the male foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The mean biomass value of the male foliage is greater than that of the females,though this difference is not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1551 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass at exponent 0·78.
Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass with an exponent of 0·78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1050 t0 “trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Female shrub foliage biomass was 1.1 times male biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “their average foliage biomass is 1.1 times greater than that of the males ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2272 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage represented 12.58% of dry biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “Cryptomeria japonica trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–126 e1 “12.58% by foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–922 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shrub foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.
Verbatim
e0 “there was no significant difference between sexes regarding the foliage biomass (P0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1813 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
About 50% of biomass was lost over winter, mainly foliage .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “About 50% of the biomass was lost during the winter, mainly in foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–850 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Branch foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.
Verbatim
e0 “there is no significant difference in foliage biomass between the sexes(P0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1031 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DBH size correlated positively with flower and reproductive and foliage biomass and diameter in crement.
Outcomeflower biomass,reproductive biomass,foliage biomass and diameter increment e0 Directionpositively correlated e0 Verbatim
e0 “DBH size is positively correlated with flower biomass ,reproductive biomass , foliage biomass and diameter in crement(P0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1849–1969 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Approximate three-quarter foliage biomass scaling suggests metabolic scaling exponents may be loosely tied to foliage fractal dimension.
Outcomemetabolic scaling exponents e0 Qualifier¾ scaling of foliage biomass e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Because ¾ scaling of foliage biomass is still approximately valid, this implies that metabolic scaling exponents may not be as tightly linked to the fractal dimension of foliage as previously assumed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1608 t0 “trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Flower, foliage and reproduction biomass differed significantly among in dividuals.
Outcomeflower,foliage and reproduction biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “The flower, foliage and reproduction biomass (the sum of flower and fruit biomass ) also showed significant differences among in dividuals(P0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1174 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.