View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: maize ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear removal reduced dry weight in all hybrids.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–40 e0 “For all hybrids, ear removal led to a decrease in dry weight , reduced N, total N, and phosphorus contents of the total plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–828 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Top dry weight growth rate (CGR) of maize showed a rapid decrease during the ear-filling period.
OutcomeTop dry weight growth rate (CGR) e1 Directionrapid decrease e1 Qualifierduring the ear-filling period e1 Verbatim
e1 “Top dry weight growth rate (CGR) changed like a shape of unimodal curve with a peak value occurring at about silking in each year, and showed a rapid decrease during the ear-filling period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1510 t0 “Productivity of Maize for Whole-Plant Silage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–70 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem dry weight of maize increased slowly in the first half of the ear-filling period and then increased or decrease d in the latter half.
Outcomedry weight of stem e1 Directionincreased slowly e1 Qualifierincrease or decrease during the latter half of the ear-filling period e1 Verbatim
e1 “The dry weight of stem (culm+leaf sheath+tassel) increased slowly during the first half of the ear-filling period and then showed increase or decrease during the latter half of the ear-filling period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1043 t0 “Productivity of Maize for Whole-Plant Silage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–70 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Top dry weight growth rate (CGR) of maize peaked at about silking with a unimodal curve.
OutcomeTop dry weight growth rate (CGR) e1 Qualifierpeak value occurring at about silking in each year e1 Verbatim
e1 “Top dry weight growth rate (CGR) changed like a shape of unimodal curve with a peak value occurring at about silking in each year, and showed a rapid decrease during the ear-filling period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1510 t0 “Productivity of Maize for Whole-Plant Silage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–70 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear removal reduced phosphorus in all hybrids.
Outcomephosphorus contents e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–40 e0 “For all hybrids, ear removal led to a decrease in dry weight , reduced N, total N, and phosphorus contents of the total plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–828 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear removal reduced reduced N in all hybrids.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–40 e0 “For all hybrids, ear removal led to a decrease in dry weight , reduced N, total N, and phosphorus contents of the total plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–828 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear removal reduced total N in all hybrids.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–40 e0 “For all hybrids, ear removal led to a decrease in dry weight , reduced N, total N, and phosphorus contents of the total plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–828 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
High color selection increased dry matter accumulation rate relative to low color selection.
TreatmentSelection for HC e0 Verbatim
e0 “Selection for HC increased RDMA but tended to decrease EFPD compared to LC strains in both NDSF and NDSD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1256 e1 “maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–49 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear removal increased leaf and stalk carbohydrate content.
Outcomecarbohydrate content e0 Comparatorrespective controls e0 Verbatim
t0 “Maize Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–40 e0 “an increase in carbohydrate content of the leaves and stalks, relative to respective controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–927 e1 “For all hybrids, ear removal led to a decrease in dry weight , reduced N, total N, and phosphorus contents of the total plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–828 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The ear itself did not dictate senescence rate or completion.
Outcomerate or completion of the senescence process e0 Verbatim
t0 “Maize Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–40 e0 “the ear per se does not dictate the rate or completion of the senescence process ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1773 e1 “For all hybrids, ear removal led to a decrease in dry weight , reduced N, total N, and phosphorus contents of the total plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–828 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.