View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Stress decrease d relative water content .
Outcomerelative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “CUCUMBER ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–91 e0 “Generally a decrease in relative water content and an in crease in dry weight content were recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–499 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
PEG treatment reduced relative water content in rice leaves.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “PEG treatment resulted in a decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–178 t0 “Rice Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shirazi had a greater decrease in water potential and relative water content than Gharashani.
Outcomewater potential and relative water content e0 Directionhigher decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “It also had a higher decrease in water potential and relative water content and a lower in crease in leaf area as compared with Gharashani. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–530 t0 “GRAPE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 e1 “Shirazi showed a higher decrease in shoot and root lengths and fresh weights than Gharashani ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–390 e2 “2-week salinity (25, 50 and 100 mM NaCl) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–172 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem relative water content did not decrease significantly during the day.
Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “stem relative water content (RWC) and stem hydraulic conductivity (K(s)) of this bamboo species did not decrease significantly during the day ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–503 t0 “Sinarundinaria nitida (Mitford) Nakai ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–283 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d chlorophyll content and relative water content .
Treatmentdrought condition e0 Outcomechlorophyll content and relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “chlorophyll content and relative water content (RWC) decrease in the drought condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–464 t0 “Durum Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d banana leaf relative water content .
Treatmentdecreased in water content e0 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content and soluble protein content in plants with decrease d in water content . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1833 t0 “banana cultivars and hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–70 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Elevated CO2 mitigated drought-related decrease in sorghum leaf relative water content .
Treatmentelevated CO 2 concentration e0 Outcomerelative water content in leaves e0 Directionreducing the decrease e0 Qualifiernegative drought impact e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sorghum also showed a mitigating effect of elevated CO 2 concentration on the negative drought impact, particularly in reducing the decrease of relative water content in leaves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1599 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf rust decrease relative water content in wheat by -11.42.
Interactorleaf rust e0 pathogen Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 e0 “there was -42.92, -23.72, -23.01, and -11.42, % decrease in chlorophyll content , flag leaf area, specific flag leaf area and relative water content in leaf rust (diseased) plot respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–809 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d leaf area and relative water content in mulberry, with a marked decrease only in severe stress.
Outcomeleaf area and relative water content e2 Qualifiera marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 3-month-old mulberry plants at four levels of water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–148 e2 “Though leaf area and relative water content decrease d, significantly, a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–380 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 10 % decrease in relative water content accompanied a 60-min ozone exposure of 0.55 ppm.
Treatment60-min ozone exposure of 0.55 ppm e7 Outcomerelative water content e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “characteristics of primary bean leaves were studied in relation to ozone sensitivity and in jury ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–175 e7 “A 10 % decrease in relative water content accompanying a 60-min ozone exposure of 0.55 ppm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1025 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.