View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Among five tomato varieties, protein content, total acidity and plot yield did not differ significantly.
Material5 tomato varieties e6 Outcomeprotein content,total acidity and plot yield e3 Directionno significant differences e3 Verbatim
e0 “five tomato varieties were measured when 2 kinds of compound fertilizers were used as base-fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–148 e3 “there were no significant differences in protein content,total acidity and plot yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–488 e6 “Among the tested 5 tomato varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–402 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield at maximum N rate did not significantly differ from the check plot .
Treatmentmaximum N rate e3 Directiondid not significantly differ e3 Verbatim
e0 “Dataset (2001 to 2014) from long-term winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) experiments at Lahoma and Stillwater, Oklahoma was used ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–216 e3 “yield at maximum N rate did not significantly differ from check plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1050 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rice-season evapotranspiration and grain yield showed no significant plot difference in the winter wheat season.
Directionno significant difference e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was no significant difference in these parameters between the plot s during the winter wheat‐growing season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–763 e1 “The ET rate was 23 % higher in the warmed plot as compared to the control plot during the rice paddy growing season, and the rice grain yield was 16.3 % lower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–645 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Alexandria molokhia fresh leafy yield per plot was not significantly affected at salinity up to 2000 ppm in the first season.
MaterialAlexandria landrace e0 Treatmentsalinity levels up to 2000 ppm e0 OutcomeFresh leafy yield/plot e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Fresh leafy yield / plot of Alexandria landrace was not significantly affected by irrigation at salinity levels up to 2000 ppm of salinity level in the first seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1711 t0 “Okra and Molokhia Landraces ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield in the CTV treatment was slightly lower than in the WW plot but not significantly different.
Verbatim
e0 “scheduling irrigation in corn ( Zea mays L.) using canopy temperature data ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 e1 “Yield s of grain in the CTV treatment were slightly lower than in the WW plot , but not significantly so ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2363–2465 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield , specific leaf area, leaf area ratio, and leaf weight ratio did not differ significantly between open screen house and open plot plants.
InteractorPhytolyma lata e2 pest Outcomeyield, specific leaf area, leaf area ratio and leaf weight ratio e0 Directionno significant differences e0 Qualifier70% of that in the open plot without screening e0 Comparatoropen plot without screening e0 Settingopen screen house e0 Verbatim
e0 “There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in yield , specific leaf area, leaf area ratio and leaf weight ratio of plants growing in the open screen house and open plot without screening (infested plot s) even though irradiance incident in the open screen house was 70% of that in the open plot without screening. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1286 e1 “Milicia excelsa (Iroko) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–23 e2 “gall forming psyllid Phytolyma lata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–351 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Germination was not a major factor for cereal stands, except on a plot where salinity stress was combined with spring drought.
Qualifierexcept on a plot where salinity stress was combined with spring drought e4 Verbatim
e4 “adequate stands of all cereals were established and germination was not a major factor except on a plot where salinity stress was combined with spring drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–718 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Warming did not significantly alter aboveground biomass production compared with the non-warmed plot .
Outcomeaboveground biomass production e1 Directiondid not significantly alter e1 Comparatornon-warmed plot e1 Verbatim
t0 “Climatic Warming Increases Winter Wheat Yield but Reduces Grain Nitrogen Concentration in East China ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 e1 “Warming did not significantly alter the aboveground biomass production, but the grain yield was 16.3, 18.1 and 19.6% (P<0.05) higher in the AW, DW and NW plot s than the non-warmed plot , respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1048 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant differences in the amount and composition of soil inorganic nitrogen were found among the second-year, third-year and long-term plot s.
Treatmentsecond year plot, third year plot e5 Outcomeamount of inorganic nitrogen and its composition e5 Verbatim
t0 “Rice Yield Decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 e5 “However there were no significant differences among the second year plot , third year plot and the long term plot , in relation to the amount of inorganic nitrogen and its composition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1457 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Growth of Solanum nigrum in the intercrop did not affect Cd concentration or yield of Welsh onion.
Treatmentgrowth of S. nigrum e1 OutcomeCd concentration and yield e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The Cd concentration and yield of Welsh onion were not affected by the growth of S. nigrum either in intercrop plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–631 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.