View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
December NSC concentration remained high and did not decrease significantly under high forest density .
OutcomeNSC concentration e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the NSC concentration in December remained at a high level and did not significantly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1166 t0 “Vitex negundo Var. heterophylla ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–114 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing bulk density reduced root length and surface area in barley nonsignificantly.
Outcomeroot length and root surface area e0 Verbatim
e0 “as the bulk density in creased, root length and root surface area decrease (statistically significant in common vetch and nonsignificant in Italian ryegrass and barley) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–789 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing bulk density reduced root length and surface area in Italian ryegrass nonsignificantly.
Outcomeroot length and root surface area e0 Verbatim
e0 “as the bulk density in creased, root length and root surface area decrease (statistically significant in common vetch and nonsignificant in Italian ryegrass and barley) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–789 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Brix at 60 cm × 20 cm spacing did not decrease significantly relative to low density .
Treatment60 cm × 20 cm plant and row spacing e0 Directionnot decreased significantly e0 Comparatorlow plant density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Comparing with the low plant density ,the growth of in dividual plant under 60 cm × 20 cm plant and row spacing were not in fluenced significantly and the Brix in stems was not decrease d significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1481 t0 “sweet sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–82 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes did not differ in density -related decline of total plant mass or root mass.
Outcometotal plant mass or root mass e0 Verbatim
t0 “Potentilla reptans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–286 e0 “but not in their decrease in total plant mass or root mass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–955 e1 “Genotypes differed in their in crease in petiole in vestment in response to an in crease in density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–895 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant decrease in photosynthesis ability of the fourth leaf or chlorophyll content was seen under 12 plants m −2 compared with 7.5 plants m −2.
Organ / stagefourth leave e0 Treatment12 plants m −2 e1 Outcomephotosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content e0 Directionno significant decrease e1 Comparator7.5 plants m −2 e1 Verbatim
e0 “The photosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content both decrease d with in creasing plant density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1727 e1 “but no significant decrease was observed under 12 plants m −2 compared to 7.5 plants m −2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1818 t0 “high density cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–101 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Applied amendments non-significantly decrease d soil bulk density .
Treatmentapplied treatments e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “After the harvest of wheat 2008-09, non-significant decrease in bulk density was recorded with applied treatments while in filtration rate remained unchanged ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–692 e2 “The treatments employed were: Tube well water (TW) alone; TW + Gypsum @ 50% soil gypsum requirement (TW + G50); TW–Canal water (CW) + G50; TW–CW + farm manure (FM) @ 25 Mg ha-1 (TW-CW + FM) before sowing wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–534 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant decrease in overall leaf biomass was detected in the transgenic poplar.
Outcomeoverall leaf biomass e0 Directionno significant decreases e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease s in overall leaf biomass were detected in these plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1826 t0 “poplar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cacao sap flux density changed by −11% without statistical significance during roof closure.
Outcomesap flux densities e0 Directiondecrease inferred e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “small nonsignificant changes in cacao (−11%) and Gliricidia (−12%) sap flux densities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–596 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
HDOM-W did not significantly decrease wheat germination relative to chopped wheat straw.
Outcomewheat germination rate e0 Directionnot significantly decreased e0 Verbatim
e0 “compared to CWS, wheat germination rate was not significantly decrease d in the HDOM- W treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–848 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.