View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
After parasitism, hosts with decreased root CEC (category B) possibly increased the host use efficiency of sandalwood seedlings compared with hosts with increased CEC (category A).
Taxonsandalwood seedlings e0 Treatmentdecreased CEC of host root (category B) e0 Comparatorhosts belonged to category A (increased CEC) e0 Verbatim
e0 “after being parasitized, decreased CEC of host root (category B) possibly increased the HUE of sandalwood seedlings consequently, increased its biomass in comparison to hosts belonged to category A (increased CEC ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–856 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
AM increased soil CEC and SOC.
Outcomesoil cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil organic carbon (SOC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the +AM treatment increased soil cation exchange capacity ( CEC ), soil organic carbon (SOC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1432 t0 “Poplar Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tobacco–maize intercropping increased CEC by 26.7%.
TreatmentTobacco–maize intercropping (TM) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Tobacco–maize intercropping (TM) enhanced CEC (26.7%) and AK (9.7%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1258 t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Clitoria ternatea favored OM and TC accumulation, CEC , pH and AMF population.
Outcomeaccumulation of OM and TC, promoting CEC, pH and the AMF population e0 Verbatim
e0 “Clitoria ternatea favored the accumulation of OM and TC, promoting CEC , pH and the AMF population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1300 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
After parasitism, hosts with decreased root CEC (category B) possibly increased sandalwood seedling biomass compared with category A hosts.
Taxonsandalwood seedlings e0 Treatmentdecreased CEC of host root (category B) e0 Comparatorhosts belonged to category A (increased CEC) e0 Verbatim
e0 “after being parasitized, decreased CEC of host root (category B) possibly increased the HUE of sandalwood seedlings consequently, increased its biomass in comparison to hosts belonged to category A (increased CEC ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–856 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Only soil K, CEC , and soybean cyst nematode influenced K uptake.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “only soil K, CEC , and Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) were found to influence K uptake. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1369 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
CEC was significantly lower in disease affected banana areas.
Settingareas affected by the disease e0 Verbatim
e0 “pH, CEC , and Na values were significantly smaller in areas affected by the disease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–656 t0 “Fusarium wilts in banana crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil pH, CEC , and phosphorus content were reported to influence AMF distribution.
OutcomeAMF distribution e0 QualifierSoil pH, CEC, and phosphorus content e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Soil pH, CEC , and phosphorus content influence AMF distribution. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1125 t0 “Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–63 t1 “Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–63 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
CEC , C/N and bacterial diversity mainly influenced rice grain carbohydrate fraction.
Interactorbacterial e0 other Outcomecarbohydrate fraction of the rice grain e0 SettingCEC, C/N and bacterial diversity e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “CEC , C/N and bacterial diversity mainly influenced the carbohydrate fraction of the rice grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1866 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ziziphus did not significantly influence soil pH, EC, CEC or texture.
Outcomesoil pH, EC, CEC and soil texture e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “soil pH, EC, CEC and soil texture were not significantly (p>0.05) influenced by Ziziphus spina-christi tree ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–966 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.